The Trinity is not the Son, but either way it is moot because Yahweh is a name for the Godhead not a Person in it.
Prove A1-4 from Scripture and show me where I assert B1 because I assert the opposite.
As for C1 I read them simply although you manifestly exclude me from "anyone." As for C1, the answer is no, and that has nothing at all to do with the point.
Moreover, I took issue with your eisegesis not with the idea that God's Word can't be added to by man, as I said before, it is something that should not and can not be done because the Word stands forever but all else fades. Although I would take issue with saying God's Word is only Scripture because first of all He is a Person, secondly nowhere is the totality of this Person said to only be in Scripture, and thirdly God's authoritative speaking and instruction can be found outside of Scripture.
B1:Ok, I misunderstood. Especially since them that use Yaweh are usually very strict about Scripture, unlike the subject of this thread being them that insist other 'words' and traditions must be added to Scripture in order to get the 'full' doctrine of Christ.
I did not know Yaweh meant the Godhead. Thanks.
A1: I say it does, and you don't. We disagree. I have no problem teaching anyone based on those two Scriptures, that we are not to add nor take away anything from the Scripture: i.e. not to disregard any of it, nor add new 'Scripture' to it.
It's called
wresting the Scriptures.
A3: simple fact of the Bible as written. You tried to limit not adding to the words of Revelation only, and the fact is that nothing can be added to the entire Bible, without adding it therefore to the last book of the Bible: Revelation.
Adding to the Scriptures at any time in history, would have necessarily occurred after the latest Scriptures were given by God to a prophet or apostle and was written as such.
A2: an interpretation of my own, that Revelation is not just a book of future prophecy, that supposedly has nothing to do with Christians from Ch 5-19, based upon 'pre-trib' doctrine. It is rather a book of Spiritual warfare through false ministry against first the saints of God and lastly with the Lamb Himself at His return in the air.
And so, wresting any of the Scriptures of the Bible, by taking away or adding to, will result in those plagues in spiritual manner in our own souls and lives. I don't say those plagues will not physically occur at one time prior to the end of the last days, but to not see their spiritual effect by ministerial error, is to fall short of the whole teaching of Scripture.
Afterall, we are promised a blessing if we read and understand and
keep those things written therein. What things written in Scripture do we keep? Doctrine, rule, and commandments by ministry of the Spirit.
How can we do that, if more than half those things written in Revelation are 'not for us', because they don't pertain to us as Christians today:
Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book.
A4: The law is one law, so that if we offend in any one point, we offend in all. (Lev 7:7)(James 2)
All the Scripture is written in one book. The word book in Scripture does not always apply to a certain book of the Bible:
Such as: the book of the Law, the book of Moses, the book of the kings of Israel and Judah: each of which included many 'books'.
Ezra opened
the book of all that was written before and read from it and gave the sense of it, and all the Scriptures of the old covenant were written one book:
Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me.
And then there is the book of the Lord, the book of the words of the Lord, the book of the prophets, the book in the right hand of Him that sat on the throne...
The point is: to limit a rule of God about not adding to the words of His book, to only the single 'little' book it is written in, is not a serious argument. Such a rule plainly would apply to all books of the Bible, which is the one book in the hand of the Lord: anything added to one book is added to all the book, and adding to any Scripture is adding to all Scripture.
And since you do agree with the conclusion anyway, then the 'eisegesis' argument isn't relevant, since the 'eisegesis' arrives at the correct conclusion. Which also is why I excluded you from anyone's simple reading of the simple Scripture, since you are the only one I have known to try and raise an 'eisegesis' argument about it, while agreeing with the conclusion from it. Which is also why I misunderstood your purpose.
the idea that God's Word can't be added to by man
Now that is an interesting statement. God's words cannot be added to by man, that God will accept as true. But His written words of Scripture certainly can and have been added to by man, which are the false teachings added to Scripture that destroy believers, and seduce them from the faith of Jesus only, Who's gospel and doctrine can only be preached
according to the Scriptures.
Although I would take issue with saying God's Word is only Scripture because first of all He is a Person, secondly nowhere is the totality of this Person said to only be in Scripture
That's not what I am saying. If anything is taught for doctrine of God by writing or word of mouth, it must be confirmed by written Scripture as true. But in the Scriptures of His book is found written His one law, doctrine, and gospel: all the truth of the true and living God is summed up in the Scriptures, not all of God, because He is not His words, nor His written words. As you say, He is a Person.
and thirdly God's authoritative speaking and instruction can be found outside of Scripture.
And so clarify: do you mean giving the sense of what is distinctly written in Scripture, as Ezra did. Or do you mean things taught for doctrine of God with equal authority of Scripture, though not found written in nor proven as so by Scripture?
If you mean the former, then stating it as 'authoritative things outside of Scripture' is not a good way of putting it, because that is how they put it that believe in traditions outside of Scripture taught as equal to Scripture, which is heretical rubbish.
