tomwebster
New Member
- Dec 11, 2006
- 2,041
- 107
- 0
- 77
Neon,
He also has "a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. (Rev 19:12b)" Do you know what it is?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The Scripture examples I gave is solid proof that God created us also flesh, meaning, we have a spirit part too. Our spirit is mortal unless it puts on immortality like Paul taught in 1 Cor.15. So there is such a thing as immortality in God's Word, and it especially applies to the Nature of The Father and The Son as everlasting. The Father made all things through The Son, which should be enough proof for a believer that Christ is God, and everlasting too. It proves that Christ existed prior to being born flesh, and could exist as Spirit without the need of a flesh body.
In Matthew 22:30, Christ compared those of the resurrection being "as the angels of God in heaven." The angels don't have the "image of the earthly" flesh body like those of us born in the flesh. The angelic state is the "image of the heavenly" state Paul spoke of in the resurrection, per 1 Cor.15.
But the blind Sadduccees refused to believe the resurrection of the dead in Paul's days, just as they still do today. That's the basis of the doctrine that man is flesh only.
So here's something that I'd like to hear a scriptural answer on....
Everyone seems to love these Isaiah verses: 9:6 For to us a Child is born, to us a Son is given; and the government shall be on His shoulder; and His name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Isa 9:7 There is no end of the increase of His government and peace on the throne of David, and on His kingdom, to order it and to establish it with judgment and with justice from now on, even forever. The zeal of Jehovah of Hosts will do this.
Why does the tense change? "IS" born; "IS" given, changes to "SHALL BE", SHALL BE", changes back to "IS no", changes back to "TO order", "TO establish", then states ""FROM now on, EVEN FOREVER", then states "WILL do".
Why on earth does the tense keep changing? What does it teach?
Thanks.
God did indeed create us as flesh, for Genesis 2:7 says: "And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul." However, what is it that empowers us to live and when taken away, causes us to die ? What is the "breath of life" that God blew into Adam's nostrils ? Psalms 104:29 says: "If you take away their spirit, they expire, and back to their dust they go." What is the spirit here at Psalms 104, that Jesus himself had, but left him, thereby causing his death ?(Matt 27:50) Please explain.
The gaining of immortality does not indicate that something lives on after death, but rather that a person who has been chosen by God for the "heavenly calling"(Heb 3:1) and has remained loyal to death, is "changed" from a mortal flesh and blood person upon death to an immortal spirit person, and is not something they possess, but a transformation occurs, "in the twinkling of an eye".(1 Cor 15:51-53) Even the angels do not have immortality, but will eventually die if separated from the Creator, Jehovah God.
Your grasp of the Bible and it's associated meanings of words and expressions is no different than the Pharisees who firmly believed in the immortality of the soul. These also believed in predestination, holding that Adam and Eve were predestined to sin and that even a minor cut on the finger was preordained. Hence, these believed in Fate, though the Bible does not teach this false doctrine, but shows that everyone is a free-moral agent.(Deut 30:19, 20)
Hello there! Well its the main reason why I logged on todday, Its something thats been hammering at the back of my mind, that I dont really understand, that I dont really associate him with my troubles or joys , that I dont view him the same way as I view God or the holy spirit. There's something not right with that, since I call myself a Christian and I feel I am a Christian.
There are so many names, the Lord, the Messiah, the Son. He is all those and more? He is God's only begotten son? What does begotten really mean in that context? After all arent I his child?
Notice how Paul says 'all others were created by means of Jesus'.... this means that Jesus is Gods first and only 'direct' creation. All other things have come into existence through Jesus. That is why Jesus is the 'only begotten' of God. Jesus is the only one who God directly created in the same way that a son or daughter may be the only child of their parents.
Hello there! Well its the main reason why I logged on todday, Its something thats been hammering at the back of my mind, that I dont really understand, that I dont really associate him with my troubles or joys , that I dont view him the same way as I view God or the holy spirit. There's something not right with that, since I call myself a Christian and I feel I am a Christian.
There are so many names, the Lord, the Messiah, the Son. He is all those and more? He is God's only begotten son? What does begotten really mean in that context? After all arent I his child?
I view God, as God and most definitely to myself ,a Father. Maybe thats where im getting baffled, because im human , and so fixated with the whole Father concept. So who is? Jesus is God?Saying that confuses me. Jesus is my Saviour? Yes i believe he died on the cross for us. I accept that, but im sure that not all there is to it,is it? I pray to God and only to God so very openly, i've never done anything else. What am I supposed to do with my belief in Jesus?Im not processing something, please help to simply this.
Who is Jesus to you? How do you apply this to your spirituality?
One can find many Bible verses that do not cover the detail like Paul did in 2 Cor.5 of what happens at flesh death. There are even some OT verses that speak specifically about the Rephaim (giants) in the abosolute 'dead' sense that they do not resurrect at all (Bullinger has an Appendix just on those cases in The Companion Bible). When all the various Bible examples are put together as a whole, it reveals that we are made up of flesh, spirit, and soul, and death of the flesh in no way ends our continued existence. Even when Christ Jesus upon the cross promised the malefactor crucified with Him, that he would be with Him that day in Paradise, that is a direct statement of revelation that part of our being continues even after flesh death.
That doesn't change what Paul also said in 2 Cor.5, that if our earthly tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. Nor does it change how Christ gave the story of the Lazarus and the rich man in Luke 16. He would not have given those events in Luke 16 showing what happens after the flesh body dies if it were not so. Likewise with the one caught up in 2 Cor.12, that event reveals a difference between our spirit and our flesh. In 1 Cor.15, Paul revealed how the soul is connected with our spirit when He preached about the resurrection of the dead.
Luke 12:4-5
4 And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.
5 But I will forewarn you Whom ye shall fear: Fear Him, Which after He hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear Him.
(KJV)
Even most of the blind Pharisees accepted the doctrine of the resurrection. The Sadduccees did not period. But the majority of both refused Jesus of Nazareth as The Christ, Messiah, to their own destruction, even as it is still with many of them today.
This is why the Jews wanted to kill Jesus, because Jesus Christ proclaimed Himself as God, even using the sacred name "I AM" at the end of John 8.
When God told Adam, "as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively die"("positively die", Hebrew, mohth ta·muth´; Gen 2:17), did Adam really die or is he alive somewhere ? When God told Adam that he will "positively die" if he disobeyed, did Jehovah God really mean it ? Genesis 5:5 says: "So all the days of Adam that he lived amounted to nine hundred and thirty years and he died." Jesus was Adam's equal, being perfect, and thus had to die, and not just the "flesh", in order to provide the ransom. Otherwise, the ransom that you and I need is null and void.
The apostle Paul, at 2 Corinthians 5, speaks of an "earthly house, this tent....(being) dissolved" upon death.(2 Cor 5:1) Yes, "dissolved", or non-existent. If something is "dissolved", what remains ? If there is something that lives on after death, then the word resurrection does not apply, for it means a ' standing up again in life'.("resurrection", Greek a·na´sta·sis) A person that has not died is not resurrected or they must die in order to be resurrected.
The apostle Peter said of Jesus to the Jews: "God raised him up from the dead, of which fact we are witnesses."(Acts 3:15) Later, Peter and John "were teaching the people and were plainly declaring the resurrection from the dead in the case of Jesus."Acts 4:2) If Jesus did not die, as you say only the flesh, then what was resurrected ? You obviously disagree with Peter and God, who inspired Luke to record the book of Acts !
When Lazarus died, what then lived on; what did Jesus resurrect ?(John 11) It is apparent that you cannot understand the meaning of the words "dissolved", at 2 Corinthians 5:1 and "changed" at 1 Corinthians 15:51. And of Luke 16:19-31, if you had read more closely, you would have recognized that Jesus was speaking to the wicked Pharisees by means of an illustration, of their being "money lovers" and feeding the Lazarus class or common people only spiritual "crumbs".(Luke 16:14) But, you are like so many who never consider the context, nor try to harmonize the Bible.
Show me where Paul "connected the soul with the spirit" at 1 Corinthians 15, though these words are interconnected in the Bible, for life cannot exist one without the other. Luke 12 provides nothing to support your claim that only Jesus "flesh" died and not his "spirit", for again you show your inability to grasp what the word spirit (Hebrew ru´ach, Greek pneu´ma) really means. I am not surprised, for the churches have been teaching distortions and lies of the Bible, since almost immediately following the death of the apostle John in about 100 C.E., when apostasy began to grow.(Matt 13:24-30)
You never explained what the "breath of life" is at Genesis 2:7, so that Adam now became an animated or living creature. I am still waiting.
It's that way so as to rightly divide the timeline of Scripture.
"For to us a Child is born, to us a Son is given" - Christ's first coming to die on the cross.
"and the government shall be upon His shoulder" - Christ's second coming to rule with a rod of iron.
The 7th verse is about David's throne already being established and then Christ's inheritance of David's throne.
I beg to differ. It defines the OP.
Ciao
Paul was talking about our flesh body with the earthly house, that if it is dissolved. But what was he talking about when he said "we have a building of God" in the present tense? He called it the "spiritual body", the "image of the heavenly" in 1 Cor.15. Even in 1 Thess.4 he taught the saints alive on earth will no way precede the alseep saints to Heaven that have already died. That along with what Jesus said to the malefactor crucified with him, and it is about life after flesh death, with the only possible death remaining for some, is the second death. Is the "second death" about flesh death again? No. It's about death of one's "spiritual body" and soul in the "lake of fire".
Strange how you try to use those Scriptures while totally forgetting this one...
1 Pet 3:18-20
18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
19 By which also He went and preached unto the spirits in prison;
20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
(KJV)
So what kind of body did Christ have when He went to preach to the spirits in prison? I very much believe that Jesus died on the cross, but His Spirit did not die, nor could It ever die. If the devil really thought he could kill God's Spirit, then he failed terribly. Just what was it that Christ commend to The Father upon death of His flesh body on the cross?
Yeah, I've heard that made up story for the blind Pharisees bit before. That's only a ploy to try and counter what Christ showed that happens after death of the flesh body per Luke 16. The 2 Cor.5 Scripture agrees perfectly, as does Eccl.12:5-7, as does 1 Cor.15 also, as does what Jesus said to the malefactor that believed on Him, etc. You simply refuse to believe it, which is your choice.
It's really simple. Christ Jesus IS Immanuel, which means 'with us is God'. That means HE existed BEFORE His coming in the flesh. Isaiah also called Christ "the everlasting Father". So how is it that you believe God's Spirit could ever die? The reason you would want to prove that God died, 'literally', is to show your lack of understanding about Jesus being God The Son, The Christ. What did Jesus say about His Spirit while hanging upon the cross just before His flesh died, anyway?
Whoever wrote this must have been confused about the 'soul' not being the same part as the "joints and marrow"...
Heb 4:12
12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
(KJV)
Paul too must have been confused also?
1Thes 5:23
23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
(KJV)
How is it this refers to 'souls' that had died and were in the heavenly without flesh bodies? How can that refer to a 'soul' without a flesh body?
Rev 20:4
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
(KJV)
And another one...
Rev 6:9
9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
(KJV)
This ain't lookin' good for your soul = flesh idea.
1 Cor 15:45
45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
(KJV)
Did you know all those Scriptures about that word "soul" is the Greek word psuche, meaning 'breath'? And that word "spirit" is Greek pneuma which can mean 'a current of air, breath or a breeze' and is also defined as 'soul' by some Bible scholars? I mean, there's general disagreement even between Bible scholars on how to define the idea of the 'soul'. Your somewhat claim of ascendency to Hebrew ru'ach simply isn't enough.
Don't you recall how God Himself referred to Hebrew nephesh (breathing creature) about His Own Soul?
Lev 26:30
30 And I will destroy your high places, and cut down your images, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols, and My soul shall abhor you.
(KJV)
At 2 Corinthians 5:1, the apostle Paul said literally that "we are having" (Greek ekhomen, present tense) "a building from God" and is accurately rendered as "if....this tent should be dissolved, we are to have a building from God, a house not made with hands, everlasting in heaven." Hence, Paul was placing the "building from God" or spiritual body, in the future, only after the death of one's fleshly body. He now says that "in this dwelling house we do indeed groan, earnestly desiring to put on the one for us from heaven."(2 Cor 5:2)
The "tent" or person himself as a fleshly being, was "dissolved" or disappeared". (Encarta Dictionary) Thus, there is nothing that lives on after death, but there is a transformation or "change" into a spirit by God's power (1 Cor 15:51) for those who have proven loyal till death that were selected by God as "kings and priests"(Rev 1:6) by anointing them with holy spirit.(Rom 8:15, 16) The word spirit can mean, depending upon context, our life-force that allows us to be animated and live (Matt 27:50; Luke 8:55), as well as an invisible person living in the heavenly realm.(1 Kings 22:21)
Paul further said that upon death, a person who received the "heavenly calling" (Heb 3:1) and remained loyal, was to "put on (Greek ependuomai, meaning to "slip on") the one (spiritual body) for us from heaven."(2 Cor 5:2) If a person puts on a piece of clothing, they obviously were not wearing it. Therefore, this "change" from a fleshly body to a spiritual body upon death requires that the person has died, completely, and not just the "flesh". Otherwise, he or she does not "put on" a spiritual body if something lived on, but would rather just be a continuation of the person, not a change. If this were the case that something lives on after death, then a person in reality has not died and therefore the word death should not be in any language.
If there is something that lives on after death, then what of David, whom Peter told the Jews, that "actually David did not ascend to the heavens" ?(Acts 2:34) Where is he since his death ? Did he really die ? Isaiah 42:5 uses both "breath" and "spirit" as parallelism, saying: "This is what the [true] God, Jehovah, has said, the Creator of the heavens and the Grand One stretching them out; the One laying out the earth and its produce, the One giving breath to the people on it, and spirit to those walking in it:" Why the parallel between "breath" and "spirit" ? What happens when a person stops breathing ? And how does this tie in with the "breath of life" at Genesis 2:7 ?
You used 1 Peter 3:18 to try to prove your point, but if you had looked more carefully, it can readily be seen that Jesus died as a man of "flesh", but was now "made alive in the spirit". Hence, Jesus did not have a spirit body within him, but was "made alive" as a spirit "son of God" after being non-existent in the grave for a period of some three days.(Acts 10:40) When something is made, it did not exist before it's being created. Jesus was resurrected as a "life-giving spirit".(1 Cor 15:45, "life-giving spirit", Greek zoopoieo pneuma) He did not possess a "life-giving spirit."
And of the name Immanuel, who was "the boy" at Isaiah 7:14-16, some 800 years before Jesus came to the earth ? By the way, please do not dismiss this question. Also who was Ithiel at Nehemiah 11:7, whose name means "With me is God" ? Was God literally with him ?
At 1 Thessalonians 5:23, the apostle Paul was not referring to heaven at all, but of the need now for the Thessalonian brothers to be "blameless....at the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ" while still on the earth, for it says that "May the very God of peace sanctify you completely. And sound in every respect may the spirit and soul and body of you [brothers] be preserved in a blameless manner at the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ." Had they failed to remain "blameless" to the "presence of ...Jesus Christ ", then the hope of a "heavenly calling" would have been revoked.(2 Thess 1:5)
In addition, you are now incorporating the word "soul" instead of "spirit". What gives ? They are not the same, but you are putting them together as if they are. You are the one that is confused, which is also so true of the churches. Furthermore, the Greek word pneu´ma is never rendered as soul. Rather, if you had done "your homework", you would have seen that the Greek word psy·khe´ is properly rendered as "soul". Using the King James Bible will further cause confusion, for it has numerous inaccuracies, with an an estimated 50,000 errors.(compare 1 Cor 10:24, 25; Gen 13:1)
Jesus Christ is ETERNAL, without beginning and without end. So what kind of body did He have BEFORE He was born in the flesh through Mary's womb? You probably won't admit that He ever existed PRIOR to coming in the flesh, because that's the heart of the false dead in the ground doctrine, it's even against the idea that Jesus Christ is not Immanuel like Isaiah said. That's even why you would make the mistake of not capitalizing "son" in your "son of God" phrase. Jesus is The Son of God, not the 'son of God'. Those in Christ Jesus are 'sons of God', meaning His children. Big difference.
New International Version (©1984)Hmmm, Jesus is "ETERNAL" according to your assertion. Yet, Jesus himself said that he was "the beginning of the creation by God".(Rev 3:14)