Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Let's not completely ignore though that Elisabeth and Zacharias are written of as "righteous" and "blameless".
I am reminded of an old story. (There are many versions, and I shall paraphrase to simply get the gist of it):
IMO: This also is representative of us in Christ. We have our old nature, and we are a new creation. Which shall come out on top? Which shall be the overcomer? We have a choice, which of our natures shall we feed. Sounds easy from such a story, but it isn't that simple, and it is a lifelong battle. My biggest weakness, is in how I treat / love my neighbor at times.
We could liken this to big bad "law" v grace epidemic.
As Paul wrote, we do not "earn" our "righteousness". It is through our actions, that we are "justified". Righteousness is by faith. Faith however, is not mere "belief". Nor is faith mere "action". Faith, is believing, and then acting upon said "belief".
If we are depending upon our actions as in our own works, then we also stumble and follow in the footsteps of Israel:
Rom 9:31 but Israel, following after a law of righteousness, did not arrive at that law.
Rom 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by works. They stumbled at the stone of stumbling;
If we choose to adhere to the Instruction, it is because we believe what YHVH hath said, and we act upon said belief.
Jam 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deluding your own selves. 23 For if any one is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a mirror: 24 for he beholdeth himself, and goeth away, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. 25 But he that looketh into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and so continueth, being not a hearer that forgetteth but a doer that worketh, this man shall be blessed in his doing.
Didn't mother always tell us to "think" before we "act"? What we think upon, shall direct our actions.
So basically what you are saying, that once declared "righteous" for one "act" of faith. We can disregard anything else, even if "God" himself should decide to "prove" us, we need not listen or obey.
Jam 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith apart from works is barren? 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, in that he offered up Isaac his son upon the altar? 22 Thou seest that faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect; 23 and the scripture was fulfilled which saith, And Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned unto him for righteousness; and he was called the friend of God. 24 Ye see that by works a man is justified, and not only by faith.
Or "the path of least resistance leads to the destination of cease to existence ;)"the path of least resistance leads to the garbage heap of despair."
However, you have not answered the direct scripture that I referenced. All you are ending up doing is attacking me.
And be quite sure that I find no pleasure in seeing anyone sinning which is exactly why I am pointing that scripture out. If by chance I am able to help another see the truth then by chance that person might do what Christ is asking.
Luke 15:10Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.
No, you find pleasure in taking credit for one not sinning. Such a nauseating approach.
Stranger
My how we like to reword grace to appear repugnant to everyone. Because I believe we are saved by our faith and declared righteous by God, forever, then I must be saying we can disregard anything else God says to us. I must believe that it is ok for me to just sin all I want because I am secure in my salvation. Such a false conclusion.
The scenario you have created can be likened to this. A woman is getting married. She has had many boyfriends in the past but has now met the man she loves and wants to be with the rest of her life. He asked her to marry him and she said yes. At the wedding the pastor declares them man and wife and they kiss each other. She then turns to the pastor and asks if they are legally married. He says yes. She then says that she can't wait to get home to call up some of her old boyfriends and go out with them. It is ridiculous.
We are saved by one act of faith. We are declared righteous by that one act.
The salvation/justification James is speaking of is the walk of salvation, not our being declared righteous by God. This is why he used a totally different event in Abraham's life.
Hello Richard
Sorry for delay. Not up to full power yet..but slowly getting there.
I know I will not be doing your posts justice.
I agree that Elisabeth and Zacharias were righteous and blameless.
I think our difference is that you see it as by what they did and didn't do.
I believe it was because of Whom they believed.
We 'do' because like Moses, "we see Him who is invisible" , we do not 'do' to become righteous, we 'do' because we see Him and because of that we chose the live in the sunshine of His love.
Like King David. It was his heart for God that was his anchor of his faith, not his action...in fact his actions often betrayed him!
And God called David "a man after mine own heart." He knew that David had understood what relationship was all about.
We 'do' because we are, we don't 'do' to become.
Well that is what I believe..and I am sticking there ;)
Thanks.
Yes, I like the first story and throw out the second :)
I can't see that anyone benefits by feeding the 'old man' within. Feeding it to keep it balanced...is keeps it alive. When God said- 'reckon yourself dead indeed to sin and alive unto Christ." My problem is acknowledging that the old man as 'alive' just because it shouts loudly and acts like it.
I agree, faith has legs. If not it abides alone and has no fruit and no glory to God.
You said "As Paul wrote, we do not "earn" our "righteousness". It is through our actions, that we are "justified". "
Sorry...I can't go with you there.
I think we 'almost' see things the same but not quite.
I still feel that you are walking with a foot in both camps.
Believing in grace, but relying on your actions for justification.
( but, that's not my business is it. ;) )
For some unfathomable reason people want to make their burden as light as possible never gaining the concept that if we are to live in the kingdom to come that we will be expected to be righteous in all our ways both in thought and deed at all times so
if anyone doesn't want to be that way now then why even try to make a show of fitting in where you won't want to be anyway.
There are even folks who think God will take the wheel for us and make us into totally different beings in order to fit into his kingdom.
You of course know all these things Richard and I am doing no more than singing to the choir... but it seems to need to be said as I am being urged to state it.
You yourself stated that even had Abraham refused when "God" sought to try / prove him, that he was already righteous / saved. You did state "refused", which would be to willfully disobey.
Grace, is unmerited favor for things done in ignorance, and the unintentional. That done willfully, or with a "high hand":
Num 15:30a But the soul that doeth aught with a high hand, whether he be home-born or a sojourner ...
Heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more a sacrifice for sins
The difference, is that by which sin is defined between you and I.
Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
From my perspective: You should be in charge of Princeton, Harvard or Yale. For according to that which you put forth. All anyone needs to do is Ace one class in their freshman year and they are fully accredited. A free ride, with a guaranteed masters degree even if they fail any and every attempt to "prove" them.
Saved for the manner which "God" prepared aforetime that we should walk in.
By what shall you be judged?
By what shall be your reward?
Which still states: That it was reckoned unto him for righteousness.
Thus you prefer the keep on sinning method.
ha well that was a quote from a song, but whatever lolOr "the path of least resistance leads to the destination of cease to existence ;)
But is it really a burden? I admit, for myself years ago, the hardest step of faith, was that initial step into His Shabat. Now, I wouldn't trade it for anything.
1 John 5:3 for this is the love of God, that His commands we may keep, and His commands are not burdensome;
Deut 30:11 For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not too hard for thee, neither is it far off.
Heb 5:9 and having been made perfect, he became unto all them that obey him the author of eternal salvation;
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye present yourselves as servants unto obedience, his servants ye are whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
As it is written: Zec 6:15 And they that are far off shall come and build in the temple of YHVH; and ye shall know that YHVH of hosts hath sent me unto you. And this shall come to pass, if ye will diligently obey the voice of YHVH your God.
Deut 30:10 if thou shalt obey the voice of YHVH thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which are written in this book of the law; if thou turn unto YHVH thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul.
Which is to attempt to make "God" in our image, rather than for us to conform to His image.
"History recalls, how great the fall can be ... Can you hear, what I'm saying" - Fool's Overture
I prefer the believer keep on walking in the Spirit method. Sin and all.
I despise those who seek to place a believer under law, to just quit sinning, and then glory in their obedience to the law, when they deceive themselves that they have kept the law. Stranger
gotta admit what he is saying sounds good, until we get to the part where confession is absent, yaSo you believe people should not follow these since they were the founding commandments that God formed all the OT laws from;
Matthew 22:36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself. 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.
Thus your message is believe in Christ but go on not loving God with all your heart and go on not loving your neighbor.... you will be forgiven all those trespasses because you believe in Christ...
So you believe people should not follow these since they were the founding commandments that God formed all the OT laws from;
Matthew 22:36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself. 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.
Thus your message is believe in Christ but go on not loving God with all your heart and go on not loving your neighbor.... you will be forgiven all those trespasses because you believe in Christ...