Woke female "Bishop" targets Trump at national cathedral prayer service

[pepper]

Bishop Budde is an advocate and organizer in support of justice concerns, including racial equity, gun violence prevention, immigration reform, the full inclusion of LGBTQ+ persons, and the care of creation. Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde

What she ispreaching in the pulpit is not Christlike.


1 Timothy 3:1 It is a trustworthy saying: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a good work.

She is still in violation of what the Bible teaches about woman in the pulpit.

This makes her a false teacher.


Satan and his demons will do anything to undermine, confuse and taint the Lord's created order.


I do not have an issue with her on a personal level.

God's written word does and all that are like her and want to usurp the God given authority of the man in the church.

Let's remember why God does not want woman teaching and leading in the church.

They are easily deceived.

1 Timothy 2:12 But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.
1 Timothy 2:13 For it was Adam who was first formed, and then Eve.
1 Timothy 2:14 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into trespass.

Nonsense.

In Sauls day Apostles were teachers. Preachers, today.
Saul praised women Apostles who served his churches.

The idea God would never call a woman to preach is Biblically indefensible.
Those who insist God is a respecter of persons don't know this,so posting proof would be a waste of time on my part when they think God,who made women in his image and likeness,discriminates against letting women spread his word. Even though they buy the Bible.


The idea women can't preach,teach,because they're easily deceived,and cite Eve as proof,is laughable.

Adam,a man,was told directly by God not to eat of the forbidden fruit.
Eve's innocence was led to eat by the wiley wiser serpent that was able to enter Eden.

Adam failed in leadership of the woman. He was told directly not to eat,and the consequence of disobedience.
He failed.

He did not lead Eve away from the tree. He let her eat. And then he ate too.

And then his leadership as a man failed again. When he lied to God. God asked why they hid from Him. And Adam blamed Eve for their disobedience. A man , Adam, a weak leader,and a coward before God.

Yet some think Eve is the reason women are weak,easily deceived, and can't preach.

 

[pepper]

Why are you defending this false teacher?

I have shown you from the Bible why she is a false teacher.

She's not false because she's a female.

She's false because she teaches evil is good and good is evil. Men preachers do that.

 

[ElectedbyHim]

Nonsense.

In Sauls day Apostles were teachers. Preachers, today.
Saul praised women Apostles who served his churches.

The idea God would never call a woman to preach is Biblically indefensible.
Those who insist God is a respecter of persons don't know this,so posting proof would be a waste of time on my part when they think God,who made women in his image and likeness,discriminates against letting women spread his word. Even though they buy the Bible.


The idea women can't preach,teach,because they're easily deceived,and cite Eve as proof,is laughable.

Adam,a man,was told directly by God not to eat if the forbidden fruit.
Eve's innocence was led to eat by the wiley wiser serpent that was able to enter Eden.

Adam failed in leadership of the woman. He was told directly not to eat,and the consequence of disobedience.
He failed.

He did not lead Eve away from the tree. He let her eat. And then he ate too.

And then his leadership as a man failed again. When he lied to God. God asked why they hid from Him. And Adam blamed Eve for their disobedience. Abliat,a weak leader,and a coward before God.

Yet some think Eve is the reason women are weak,easily deceived, and can't preach.

Nonsense.

In Sauls day Apostles were teachers. Preachers, today.
Saul praised women Apostles who served his churches.

The idea God would never call a woman to preach is Biblically indefensible.
Those who insist God is a respecter of persons don't know this,so posting proof would be a waste of time on my part when they think God,who made women in his image and likeness,discriminates against letting women spread his word. Even though they buy the Bible.


The idea women can't preach,teach,because they're easily deceived,and cite Eve as proof,is laughable.

Adam,a man,was told directly by God not to eat if the forbidden fruit.
Eve's innocence was led to eat by the wiley wiser serpent that was able to enter Eden.

Adam failed in leadership of the woman. He was told directly not to eat,and the consequence of disobedience.
He failed.

He did not lead Eve away from the tree. He let her eat. And then he ate too.

And then his leadership as a man failed again. When he lied to God. God asked why they hid from Him. And Adam blamed Eve for their disobedience. Abliat,a weak leader,and a coward before God.

Yet some think Eve is the reason women are weak,easily deceived, and can't preach.

Thank you for your opinion.

 

[Verily]

Well, I think the idea of having citizenship paperwork in the first place is ridiculous, because the first humans didn't have it, nor did they need it.

Vetting Requires Paperwork​

Vetting typically requires paperwork. The process involves gathering and verifying information about an individual, which often necessitates completing forms and submitting documents.

Even God vets

Rev 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

Just as there are those that are without

Rev 22:15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.

God knows heart so paperwork here is completely unecessary, however,

Prov 20:11 Even a child is known by his doings, whether his work be pure, and whether it be right.

Which is important in vetting, or else they can just dump open up and dump people into our country that have
come out of mental hospitals, people dangerous to our own population

You posted

LuxMundi: The Vatican's immigration policies are designed to protect its small population and the sanctity of its grounds.

Then posted

It's not anyone's place to dictate who gets to live anywhere on the earth The first humans down to the last humans are here because God put them here and allowed them to remain here

Therefore, the truly merciful thing to do is welcome those who arrive seeking shelter, money, food, clothing, and so on, whether it's at our doorstep, workplace, our country's borders, or wherever. It's merciful to try and heal those who are suffering and causing suffering.

Many of the people I have watched crossing the boarder were wearing new clothes, had cell phones, alot of them were overweight (and so well fed) and could not have possibly walked that far but were likely bussed in to various points.

Some of those causing the suffering are the cartels and/or the coyotes (those being paid to traffick human beings and children for the sexual pleasure of perverts around the world) as well as in the U.S. How have you tried to heal these coyotes?

Unfortunately, that's not the way of things across the world, so I'll say that forgiving fines is merciful, as is paying for their return to their homeland but I wouldn't pay for someone to return to their homeland if it wouldn't be good for them to return to. If it'd be more merciful to allow them to stay where it's better for them then I would pay money or do whatever to make that happen.

I could probably agree with this on one condition, that it should be REQUIRED BY LAW that every person that has voted for (or has lifted their voice in support of this) that has advocated for it (that has become a bully in the name of mercy for it) MUST BY LAW BE REQUIRED to take immigrants into their own homes and support them themselves for at least one year (or until they able to sustain themselves). Thats since they insist (on everyone elses dime) upon this mercy (when the money given through government agencies very rarely gets to where it is supposed to be going, but is laundered.

That solves that. You wouldnt have to (personally) pay to send them back but you will be required by law to (personally) support them by your own means and in your own residence. Thats fair.

 

[pepper]

Thank you for your opinion.

Thank you for yours.

 

[ElectedbyHim]

Thank you for yours.

I gave Scritures, you did not.

Scripture is not an opinion, that is, accept to the unconverted.

 

[pepper]

I gave Scritures, you did not.

Scripture is not an opinion, that is, accept to the unconverted.

You misrepresented Scripture,Saul,and God.

Your's was an errant opinion. Only God can lead you to understanding.
When you impugn God's nature with your own bias thinking errantly using Scripture to sustain your bias,posting God's actual words will never reach you.


You've made God and Saul in your image.

Women Apostles in scripture show you are wrong.

The inauguration day bishop wasn't wrong because she's a female cleric.

She was wrong because she couches sins as approved in the eyes of God. She's dead wrong. And because she thinks the Sins God condemns must be tolerated to prove our nation one sustained by a Godly people.

She's a liar and a fraud.
And not because she's a female cleric.

 

[Debp]

You couldn't even point to an example in her sermon that makes her a "false teacher".

You couldn't even point to an example in Rev. Budde's sermon that makes her a "false teacher".

I asked you for an example in her sermon that shows she's a "false teacher" and you couldn't give one.

This "bishop" stands for the LBGTQ+ agenda. If you cannot see that or admit that, you are quite naive or deceived.

 

[ElectedbyHim]

You misrepresented Scripture,Saul,and God.

Your's was an errant opinion. Only God can lead you to understanding.
When you impugn God's nature with your own bias thinking errantly using Scripture to sustain your bias,posting God's actual words will never reach you.


You've made God and Saul in your image.

Women Apostles in scripture show you are wrong.

The inauguration day bishop wasn't wrong because she's a female cleric.

She was wrong because she couches sins as approved in the eyes of God. She's dead wrong. And because she thinks the Sins God condemns must be tolerated to prove our nation one sustained by a Godly people.

She's a liar and a fraud.
And not because she's a female cleric.

Believe whatever you will.

Grace and peace to you.

 

[pepper]

This "bishop" stands for the LBGTQ+ agenda. If you cannot see that or admit that, you are quite naive or deceived.

They didn't watch the video. The bishop admits that.

 

[pepper]

Believe whatever you will.

Grace and peace to you.

I do. I believe God knows what he's talking about.

 

[Magdala]

Even God vets

God didn't make the first humans nor does He make subsequent humans get a citizenship in order to live on the earth that He created for them. Humans are more strict with one another than God is with us, despite God being the one who allows us to live on this planet. We should be humble and thankful to Him, and if we truly are, then we wouldn't be so arrogant and selfish as to think it's our place to keep others out when God allows us all to be here in the first place.

Many of the people I have watched crossing the boarder were wearing new clothes, had cell phones, alot of them were overweight (and so well fed) and could not have possibly walked that far but were likely bussed in to various points.

Some of those causing the suffering are the cartels and/or the coyotes (those being paid to traffick human beings and children for the sexual pleasure of perverts around the world) as well as in the U.S. How have you tried to heal these coyotes?

So, you're judging based on what you see externally? As Jesus said, if you judge, you'll be judged in return by the same measure. Also, the immigrants causing suffering would receive better help from professionals here in the U.S. then in their country. People should want to help those who are suffering and causing suffering.

I could probably agree with this on one condition, that it should be REQUIRED BY LAW that every person that has voted for (or has lifted their voice in support of this) that has advocated for it (that has become a bully in the name of mercy for it) MUST BY LAW BE REQUIRED to take immigrants into their own homes and support them themselves for at least one year (or until they able to sustain themselves). Thats since they insist (on everyone elses dime) upon this mercy (when the money given through government agencies very rarely gets to where it is supposed to be going, but is laundered.

That solves that. You wouldnt have to (personally) pay to send them back but you will be required by law to (personally) support them by your own means and in your own residence. Thats fair.

God's law says that we should welcome all those who come to us for help. We should want to extend help to others, even if they don't ask for it.

 

[Magdala]

This "bishop" stands for the LBGTQ+ agenda.

What does that have to do with whether or not you can point to something specific she said in her sermon that isn't of God? Nothing. You either can or you can't and apparently you can't.

 

[Verily]

Can you point to something she said in her sermon that wasn't of God?

She spoke at all as a fake Bishiop
(Although Pepper will disagree with me)

 

[Magdala]

She spoke at all as a fake Bishiop

That's not an example of something specific she said in her sermon that's not of God.

 

[Debp]

What does that have to do with whether or not you can point to something specific she said in her sermon that isn't of God? Nothing. You either can or you can't and apparently you can't.

You are like a broken record. The devil could have stood in that pulpit and talked about mercy....he is still the devil. A sermon about mercy doesn't change who he is or what he stands for.

That's all I have to say as you just keep repeating yourself.

 

[Magdala]

You are like a broken record. The devil could have stood in that pulpit and talked about mercy....he is still the devil. A sermon about mercy doesn't change who he is or what he stands for.

That's all I have to say as you just keep repeating yourself.

I don't know why it took so long for you to say she didn't say anything that wasn't of God. So, why don't you speak positively about the truth she spoke in that sermon? Aren't you pleased as a Christian that she spoke the truth about humility, mercy, and love?

 

[Debp]

@LuxMundi
I'm sure these two put up a good front when adopting two boys who they sexually abused and also pimped out.
Like the Bible says, even the devil can appear as an angel of light.

 

[Verily]

God didn't make the first humans nor does He make subsequent humans get a citizenship in order to live on the earth that He created for them. Humans are more strict with one another than God is with us, despite God being the one who allows us to live on this planet. We should be humble and thankful to Him, and if we truly are, then we wouldn't be so arrogant and selfish as to think it's our place to keep others out when God allows us all to be here in the first place.

Paul had no problem with citizenship

Acts 21:39 But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.

So, you're judging based on what you see externally?

Because many were overweight and looked well fed?

As Jesus said, if you judge, you'll be judged in return by the same measure.

I am well fed myself and it shows too when in the mirror.

Speaking of measures my own have expanded.

Also, the immigrants causing suffering would receive better help from professionals here in the U.S. then n their country

When did Jesus tell murderers and child sex traffickers to go to professionals in the U.S?

People should want to help those who are suffering and causing suffering.

Sometimes a little less coddling and instilling a fear of God can be helpful

Luke 17:7 It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

God's law says that we should welcome all those who come to us for help.

You say that as if there was never legal immigration, or that our country helps no one.

But we can always pray for those who despitefully use us.

God's* law also doesnt advocate for being a leech

Edit typo*

 

[Debp]

They didn't watch the video. The bishop admits that.

??? I don't know what you are referring to.

I was addressing LuxMundi in my post since she or he keeps thinking the bishop is wonderful in talking about mercy. But even the devil can put up a good front. The devil can appear as an angel of light.