She is no Harlot as so many seem to make Her.Yup, the Bride of Christ is His Church - of whom Peter was the first appointed earthly head (Matt. 16:18-19, John 21:15-19, Luke 22:31-32).
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
She is no Harlot as so many seem to make Her.Yup, the Bride of Christ is His Church - of whom Peter was the first appointed earthly head (Matt. 16:18-19, John 21:15-19, Luke 22:31-32).
First of all, this person is NOT a Christian, as he denies the deity if Christ.
Anyway, it has nothing to do with “puffing up” – and EVERYTHING to do with a poster who spews myths, blatant lies and other filth about the Catholic Church with impunity.
Calling him “ignorant” is actually pretty charitable, considering the labels that truly apply to him . . .
him . . .
Why don't you exegete Ephesians 4:11–15 and prove The Church and Scripture are not equally necessary and important for teaching, instead of making empty assertions.
Jesus' shepherding is not a gift.
It is WHO he is.
And it is definitely not something he designates to countless thousands of others.
He said he is that ONE Shepherd in John 10, not the head of countless thousands of them, per modern philosophy.
You do have a different Bible.I must have a different bible to you. All mine say...
Ephesians 4:11 And indeed He (JESUS) gave some to be apostles, and some prophets; and some evangelists; and some shepherds and teachers;
Ephesians 4:12 with a view to the perfecting of the saints for the work of the ministry, for the building up of the body of Christ,
Ephesians 4:13 until we all may come to the unity of the faith and of the full knowledge of the Son of God, to a full-grown man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ,
The New Jerusalem City was compared to a beautiful bride, not IS a beautiful bride.Yup, the Bride of Christ is His Church - of whom Peter was the first appointed earthly head (Matt. 16:18-19, John 21:15-19, Luke 22:31-32).
Zion was the name of a hill that came to be used as a designation for Jerusalem and eventually for all of the inhabitants of Judah. In the New Testament, “Zion” is used to designate the new, heavenly Jerusalem to which Christians “have come” (Hebrews 12:22).n
No, that is the New Jerusalem City coming down from heaven, not the RCC.
You must be a preterist...LOL
Another preterist?Zion was the name of a hill that came to be used as a designation for Jerusalem and eventually for all of the inhabitants of Judah. In the New Testament, “Zion” is used to designate the new, heavenly Jerusalem to which Christians “have come” (Hebrews 12:22).
Since Zion was already a metaphor for God’s people, translating Isaiah 1:8 as “daughter of Zion” is a way of saying “the daughter of God’s people” — a concept not expanded on anywhere in the Bible. Translating as the HCSB and NRSV do literally means “God’s people — His daughter,” a thought that is also found in Zechariah 2:10, Jeremiah 46:19, and Jeremiah 48:18.
In his commentary on Isaiah, W. E. Vine (Protestant) expresses his preference for the translation “Zion the Daughter” in Isaiah 1:8, saying, “It is expressive of the tenderness with which the Lord had regarded the relation with which He had established between Jerusalem (as representing His people) and Himself.”
While I have not read anything about Vine having daughters, I do know he had five children, so the odds are quite good that he did have a daughter, and that this was why the verse so captured his attention.
Only a dad that has had daughters will really get this. I have a son and two daughters. I love my son every bit as much as I love my daughters, but there is something different (not more) in a dad’s heart for his girls. Mothers love the daughters just as much as fathers do, but there is still a difference in the way a dad feels about and relates to his daughters. There is a kind of tender protectiveness in the heart of a man for his daughters that only experience can describe.
Bethphage is a small town on the Mount of Olives, the hill in front of the Temple of Jerusalem. Jesus’ ride is short but important. He travels over the crest of the Mount of Olives, down past the Garden of Gethsemane, through the Kidron Valley and up to the gates of Jerusalem. The crowd becomes increasingly excited because Jesus’ actions are the fulfillment of a prophesy of Zechariah: “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king comes to you; triumphant and victorious is he, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey” (Zech 9:9).
The crowds proclaim that Jesus is the son of David, the son of a king. Not only is he the humble king promised by Zechariah; he is proclaimed to be the Prophet-like-Moses promised in Deuteronomy 8:15. The crowds cry out: “Hosanna”, which originally meant “rescue us” or “save us” and gradually came to be a word of praise and jubilation.
“By the time of Jesus, the word had also acquired Messianic overtones. In the Hosanna acclamation, then, we find an expression of the complex emotions of the pilgrims accompanying Jesus and of his disciples: joyful praise of God at the moment of the processional entry, hope that the hour of the Messiah had arrived, and at the same time a prayer that the Davidic kingship and hence God’s kingship over Israel would be reestablished”
Where Will the New Jerusalem Be?
You mock what you refuse to understand. Your blind prejudice and stubborn bigotry is glaring. Are you too embarrassed to cite the name of your "superior" faith community? Stay in the shadows, it's safer.Another preterist?
You think the New Jerusalem City, that the nations go in and out of in heaven, with 1000 mile high walls etc., are not real?
The mansions Jesus PROMISED are not real?
Rather WE are the mansions?
Yikes!!!
You do have a different Bible.
All modern Bibles that say that openly debunk Jesus in John 10.
Carefully notice that the KJV never called anyone a shepherd in the N.T.
The modern versions are ignorantly and purposefully contradictory, proving bias over fact.(the translators believed they too are shepherds of Jesus' flock).
i can see that you preterists are not happy when being exposed.You mock what you refuse to understand. Your blind prejudice and stubborn bigotry is glaring. Are you too embarrassed to cite the name of your "superior" faith community? Stay in the shadows, it's safer.
![]()
My guess is Truther has been thrown out of every community he has been in because of his pride, a sociopathic bible thumper in a church of one.I have been following your posts to try and understand where you are coming from... and other than your emphasis on the word Shepherd... I don't see your point... but it seems you are advocating the King James Only argument ?? I have never heard anyone take offence to a pastor being referred to as a Shepherd... It's an analogy of sorts...with significance in the ROLE a pastor plays...
What do you think the job/role of a pastor is as far as responsibility towards the people he preaches to? Also... Bread of Life has stated that you deny the deity of Christ... there fore you are not a Christian... Can you address this? For the sake of my curiosity... and not as a means of attack by me...
My guess is Truther has been thrown out of every community he has been in because of his pride, a sociopathic bible thumper in a church of one.
Thank you. You have class:).I have been following your posts to try and understand where you are coming from... and other than your emphasis on the word Shepherd... I don't see your point... but it seems you are advocating the King James Only argument ?? I have never heard anyone take offence to a pastor being referred to as a Shepherd... It's an analogy of sorts...with significance in the ROLE a pastor plays...
What do you think the job/role of a pastor is as far as responsibility towards the people he preaches to? Also... Bread of Life has stated that you deny the deity of Christ... there fore you are not a Christian... Can you address this? For the sake of my curiosity... and not as a means of attack by me...
That is not a nice thing to say about Truther.My guess is Truther has been thrown out of every community he has been in because of his pride, a sociopathic bible thumper in a church of one.
You are welcome.@Truther For the sake of catching you while you are on line... THANK you for taking the time to answer my questions in an honest manner.
I don't debate topics... which is probably sad because I would probably be good at it due to the fact that I don't make personal attacks.
I will read your answer... and digest what you have stated. Tenderly... Adoration
Good point. It's hard to be charitable in the face of Truther's venom. He is obviously far removed from Acts which he claims to be his birthright.That is not the answer I was waiting for... I don't know WHY people engage in these types of conversations if they can't answer with genuine questions and comments... This discussion is filled with ARROGANCE on ALL sides... It is so easy NOT to feed the monsters... but people seem to like the DRAMA.... In my book... if you can't be nice... or polite... I CHOOSE not to engage in conversation with you...
People use the excuse that they want to STAND for the truth... and protect the TRUTH... but I think they just really like the DRAMA.
Good point. It's hard to be charitable in the face of Truther's venom. He is obviously far removed from Acts which he claims to be his birthright.