Waiting on him
Well-Known Member
The cross in my opinion is the putting off of the flesh this is how we enter.think spiritual....not carnal.....I do not literally pick up a cross and carry it around.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The cross in my opinion is the putting off of the flesh this is how we enter.think spiritual....not carnal.....I do not literally pick up a cross and carry it around.
yes, and i say again that that battle is over, and has already been won, not bc that is my idea but bc that is apparently what Scripture says about that. Jesus is not fighting any battle against satan, satan has already been defeated, and what you would be described Scripturally as doing is "boxing at the air" i guess wadr. Or maybe not, but that is for you to decide, do plenty of it myself understand, and i dont really know about your case, based upon some light forum interaction and all, which may not be very representative right, we tend to come here and post in ideals prollyas far as being at Jesus side when He fights the battle against Satan well that is how I see it in scripture.
This showdown was finished a Calvary when God placed Him up there in the religious capital of the word 2k years ago.yes, and i say again that that battle is over, and has already been won, not bc that is my idea but bc that is apparently what Scripture says about that. Jesus is not fighting any battle against satan, satan has already been defeated, and what you would be described Scripturally as doing is "boxing at the air" i guess wadr. Or maybe not, but that is for you to decide, do plenty of it myself understand, and i dont really know about your case, based upon some light forum interaction and all, which may not be very representative right, we tend to come here and post in ideals prolly
why do you call Me good? there, to um Jesus anyway,
if you could rephrase the q more succinctly, im not getting the perceived dichotomy yet i guess sorryyou didn’t answer
Why are you trying to change what Scripture says? The Man of Sin, the Son of Perdition, that Wicked, the Beast, the Little Horn, the King of Fierce Countenance, are all references to an INDIVIDUAL. Just as the Lord Jesus Christ was an individual, the Antichrist will be an individual who will present himself as *the true Christ" or *the true Messiah*.The context of 2 Thes. 2 IS IN THE PLURAL, not the singular!!
I wasn't asking people to look at things based largely on how they affect them. I'm not sure that salvation would have been lost. I think God has back-up plans; but that wasn't what I was driving at. I was asking if Jesus could have become "a beast that came out of the water" by following Satan and betraying the Father.Salvation would've been lost, ..was that your point?
The thing is that we can have difficulty figuring out what's what. Satan can plant ideas in minds and some people believe they're their ideas. On the other hand, some people think bad thoughts on their own and blame Satan for them.Not at all he totally exists Jesus Himself told him to get behind Him.
Are we talking about salvation, or perfection, ...salvation.well, according to your def of "saved" maybe, but prolly not according to be perfect as I am perfect.
No by God's Law anymore, ...why are you bringing up politics?? sure it does, we have capital punishment? At least in US, you might not
You were guessing on this? Did you realize what you said? Yes, everyone knows that the Pharisees & Sadducees were indignant towards him, but they were unable to lay a single viable charge against him, during his trial. They were full of hot air and jealousy.well i dunno, prolly to someone's perception He did, ive never actually tried to document that, but a point is that He obv committed no sin yet just as obviously royally pissed off some authorities right
which to you currently means that you will become an immortal after you have died for holding certain beliefs now, or no?Are we talking about salvation, or perfection, ...salvation.
well i beg to differ, our laws are derived from the same decalogue number 1, and 2 we are assured that the law has not passed away anyway?No by God's Law anymore
we are allowed hindsight into the matter, but in the moment these were not so clear i guess, didnt help Jesus any right? At the time? Yes, He broke laws, according to those in authority, who make the laws, is possibly a point that ends up being missed thereYou were guessing on this? Did you realize what you said? Yes, everyone knows that the Pharisees & Sadducees were indignant towards him, but they were unable to lay a single viable charge against him, during his trial. They were full of hot air and jealousy.
So no, he did not break any Laws, he simply demonstrated the full meaning of, for example, the Sabbath, by showing that it was ok to transgress the Sabbath, in the case of where human life or health was at risk, as God had always intended.
a man who is dead and raised into the knew of His life, no longer has a cross to carry. You dont see Jesus carrying a cross anymore...think spiritual....not carnal.....I do not literally pick up a cross and carry it around.
Well, everything in life can be construed as an analogy, metaphor or a figure or typology. That's too easy, and goes without saying. And this is the precarious aspect of biblical hermeneutics & exegesis, if one establishes as a hermeneutic principle that a certain amount, or all, of scripture, allows a non-literal interpretation, then without further guidelines and disciplined exegesis, it turns into a free-for-all.I wasn't asking people to look at things based largely on how they affect them. I'm not sure that salvation would have been lost. I think God has back-up plans; but that wasn't what I was driving at. I was asking if Jesus could have become "a beast that came out of the water" by following Satan and betraying the Father.
I suggest that Revelation is a book relevant to everyone who reads it. It is about more than future events. Often it can be about the here and now. Blessed is the person who reads it and keeps the sayings -- true nearly two thousand years ago -- and true today. I think we see "minor" versions of the beast of the water in every generation. Thank goodness, most of them are not gifted spiritually.
I am talking about people who have this or that spiritual ability and then sell out to Satan. Some are like Jesus -- they're baptized and the Holy Spirit descends -- and when the time comes for them to face temptation, they succumb because they crave power or money more than the kingdom of God. Some have the ability to perform miracles; and they mislead others through signs and wonders. Yes, we can be grateful they aren't that gifted spiritually. Satan can use them, but the truth is they aren't that powerful. Ultimately a truly powerful person will rise up out of the water with the ability to do great signs and wonders. For now, never mind him -- look at the minor ones already around.
The passage can also be read as a warning to the individual Christian not to sell his gifts that way to the Devil.
Sinners who repent in the name of Jesus Christ will receive eternal salvation.which to you currently means that you will become an immortal after you have died for holding certain beliefs now, or no?
The Levitical Law is not binding on either Jews, Gentiles or Christians, in order to receive the aforementioned salvation. It's called Sola Fida.well i beg to differ, our laws are derived from the same decalogue number 1, and 2 we are assured that the law has not passed away anyway?
Possibly the point gets missed, but many theologians recognize Jesus as a rebel, as myself, and you apparently. But, not a rebel to God, obviously, ...which is what you initially stated.we are allowed hindsight into the matter, but in the moment these were not so clear i guess, didnt help Jesus any right? At the time? Yes, He broke laws, according to those in authority, who make the laws, is possibly a point that ends up being missed there
which according to your def of "eternal" means that they will become immortals, right?Sinners who repent in the name of Jesus Christ will receive eternal salvation.
yes, ive read the brochureThe Levitical Law is not binding on either Jews, Gentiles or Christians, in order to receive the aforementioned salvation. It's called Sola Fida.
he said with complete confidence? :)There are universal laws that are still considered sins in God's eyes, yes.
ahSome belong to the decalogue, but I don't believe that the Sabbath is still binding in any manner.
i am? it wont? this heaven is a future place that you might attain only after you have died, right?Either way, you're right about actions that still constitute sin, I agree 100%, I was just saying that this will not disqualify you from heaven, necessarily.
you lost me, sorry. dont most ppl define salvation in just that manner?It can, but we don't define salvation in such a manner, unless we're discussing the authenticity of one's faith.
According to your idea then, he was not seriously tempted. I tend to think he could have but chose correctly and thus deserves credit for overcoming real temptation. Your idea almost seems to deprive him of free will, making it sound as if life was easy for him. I would say Jesus deserves credit for loving God and choosing correctly in all his temptations. I think he was tempted more than we are and in more things. I can't excuse my own failings by saying Jesus could do it because he really couldn't be tempted and couldn't have failed.So, no, Jesus could never have followed the beast, ever. Jesus attained perfection in all wisdom and actions, in that, a wise man never succumbs to depravity, hedonism and wickedness (don't even try to ask me why). Perfection is also a sign, and primarily above all things, that Jesus loved God with all his heart mind and soul. Thus, there is no reason to believe that Jesus was that stupid, shallow, reprobate and reckless, to commit such a wayward and sinful act, ever, ever.
Yeswhich according to your def of "eternal" means that they will become immortals, right?
Eternal as forever
Paul's wolves were extremely reliable. Although considered wild by nature, if fed regularly and trained properly, wolves can be trusted and be extremely disciplined. I won't guarantee that they'll fetch a ball every time that one is thrown to them, or not chase a fox when told not to, but extremely reliable all the same.yes, ive read the brochure, i dont have much confidence in Paul's wolves, sorry
yes, yesi am? it wont?
No heaven is a place that you attain after collecting enough air miles. I forget the exact number, but somewhere near 144,000 (i think that i read it in the Book of Revelation somewhere?).this heaven is a future place that you might attain only after you have died, right?
you lost me, sorry. dont most ppl define salvation in just that manner?
How in the world did the topic just change from you saying that Jesus could've followed the Beast, to me saying that he couldn't because he 'attained' perfection? Jesus acquired perfection by being tempted and resisting, for with many tears and supplications he prayed to God for strength and wisdom. My point was, once perfect, on what grounds would he succumb to sin, if he didn't during his many trials and tribulations? Perfection means not seduced by sin. Sin is not attractive to a wise person, that's my point.According to your idea then, he was not seriously tempted. I tend to think he could have but chose correctly and thus deserves credit for overcoming real temptation. Your idea almost seems to deprive him of free will, making it sound as if life was easy for him. I would say Jesus deserves credit for loving God and choosing correctly in all his temptations. I think he was tempted more than we are and in more things. I can't excuse my own failings by saying Jesus could do it because he really couldn't be tempted and couldn't have failed.