Sorry, but you are just one person. You do not know everything about your church.
I'm giving you proof. Tell me why Mary never had sex with Joseph? She did, Matthew 1:25.
When you answer that then tell me I'm ignorant.
Lol...... Since you couldn't provide WRITTEN evidence from The Church of your accusation (lie) you pivoted it to being an Oral Tradition of The Church. When I tell you that 3 generations of Catholics have never heard of this "Oral Tradition" you tell me that I don't know everything about my Church...... But YOU, a Protestant, knows of this Catholic Oral Tradition? But 3 generations of Catholics never heard of this Oral Tradition?
You crack me up Titus.
You can't admit that you lied, can you?
Moving on to your "evidence" from Matthew 1:25. I know nothing I say is going to change what your Revolutionary Protestant men have taught you but
just so we are both clear: The original Protestant's, Calvin and Luther, reject your "Mary was not a perpetual virgin" theory. The men you are reading/following rejected the teachings of Calvin and Luther and your men split from the Original Protestant Church after Calvin and Luther split from the Original Church. Can you see how far your men have fallen from the Original Church and it's teachings?
Scripture’s statement that Joseph “knew [Mary] not until she brought forth her firstborn” would not necessarily mean they did “know” each other after she brought forth Jesus.
Until is often used in Scripture as part of an idiomatic expression Here are some biblical examples:
2 Samuel 6:23: And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to (
until) the day of her death. (Does this mean she had children after she died?)
1 Timothy 4:13: Until I come, attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. (Does this mean Timothy should stop teaching after Paul comes?)
1 Corinthians 15:25: For he (Christ) must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. (Does this mean Christ’s reign will end? By no means! Luke 1:33 says, “he will reign over the house of Jacob
forever and of his kingdom there shall be no end.”)
Some have argued that because Matthew 1:25 uses the Greek words
heos hou for “until” whereas the texts I mentioned above from the New Testament use
heos alone, there is a difference in meaning. The argument goes that
Heos hou indicates the action of the first clause does not continue. Thus, Mary and Joseph “not having come together” would have ended after Jesus was born.
The problems with this theory begin with the fact that no available scholarship concurs with it. In fact, the evidence proves the contrary.
Heos hou and
heos are used interchangeably and have the same meaning. Acts 25:21 should suffice to clear up the matter: “But when Paul had appealed to be kept in custody for the decision of the emperor, I commanded him to be held until (Gk.
heos hou) I could send him to Caesar.” Does this text mean that Paul would not be held in custody after he was “sent” to Caesar? Not according to the biblical record. He would be held in custody while in transit (see Acts 27:1) and after he arrived in Rome for a time (see Acts 29:16). The action of the main clause did not cease with
heos hou.
Your welcome....Mary