Cant say the unbelieving Jews don't deserve all this though after persecuting Christs followers,worshiping the beast and taking it's mark.
I don't share your thoughts on that since I don't see unbelieving Jews having anything to do with persecuting Christians one way or the other. Meaning in our day and time. That aside.
Daniel 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
The first thing to note is that we can't divorce any of this from the following, the fact Jesus, in Matthew 24, connected the abomination of desolation with great tribulation.
Daniel 12:11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.
13 But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.
Just because these things are mentioned after verse 1 doesn't mean they don't fit during verse 1 nor verse 2. Take verse 13, for instance. Obviously, none of that can come to pass until verse 2 is fulfilled first. If verse 13 is relevant to verse 2, it only stands to reason that verse 11 is relevant to verse 1. And since verse 11 is meaning during verse 1, and that during verse 1 it leads to a resurrection event, we can know without a doubt that Matthew 24:15-21 is not involving 70 AD since nothing in Daniel 12 is involving 70 AD.
The following couldn't possibly be coincidences, thus nothing to see here.
Matthew 24:15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand: )
Matthew 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Daniel 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
Daniel 12:11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
Both accounts are involving a time of trouble that can't be matched nor surpassed in greatness. Both accounts are involving an AOD during this time of trouble.
Then if we factor in the following. Both of these accounts lead to a resurrection of the dead at the end of this time of trouble.
Daniel 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
Mark 13:27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.
The following verse, verse 12 below, mentions waiting and coming to the 1335th day, where, in my mind it is obviously meaning verse 13, and also meaning 'at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book(verse 1) and 'some to everlasting life'(verse 2), that being when one cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. And that there is no way to come to this 1335th day without it involving the 1290 days mentioned in verse 11 first.
Daniel 12:12 Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days.
The way some try and get around all these things, they insist that the time period that Daniel 12:1 is involving is not the same time period that Matthew 24:21 is involving. Some even go as far as insisting that Daniel 12:11 is involving the days of Antiochus E4 in 167 BC. Talk about an interpretation being all over the place and having no sound context. As if 167 BC has any relevance to verse 1 and 2 in Daniel 12. Not to mention, the AOD Jesus mentioned in Matthew 24 has zero to do with what A4E did earlier in history since He placed that in the future.