So, "I AM" = The [ Always Was, Is Now, And Always Will Be ] Eternally Existing One?Jesus declared “I WILL BE.” So his audience must have favored the “I AM” interpretation of Exodus 3:14.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So, "I AM" = The [ Always Was, Is Now, And Always Will Be ] Eternally Existing One?Jesus declared “I WILL BE.” So his audience must have favored the “I AM” interpretation of Exodus 3:14.
That is a Grand SLAM DUNK into HELL via deception via VOID of the HOLY SPIRIT.While JWs got a lot of things wrong, it was a grand slam on their part that they successfully identified that Jesus isn't God. Therefore, they don't have the idolatry problem that all of the Protestants and Catholics suffer from.
My friend, you have truncated my quote and flipped the meaning! What I said was "there is just no way to conclude that Jesus declared “I WILL BE.” So his audience must have favored the “I AM” interpretation of Exodus 3:14."So, "I AM" = The [ Always Was, Is Now, And Always Will Be ] Eternally Existing One?
EXCELLENT Post and 100% CORRECTMy friend, you have truncated my quote and flipped the meaning! What I said was "there is just no way to conclude that Jesus declared “I WILL BE.” So his audience must have favored the “I AM” interpretation of Exodus 3:14."
I'd have to think about equating "I AM" with "The Eternally Existing One," but my initial reaction is positive.
Here is a slightly tongue-in-cheek version of Exodus 3:13-14:
But Moses said to God, ‘If I come to the Israelites and say to them, “The God of your ancestors has sent me to you,” and they ask me, “What is his name?” what shall I say to them?’
God said to Moses, ‘I AM WHO I AM – and just exactly Who that is is none of your business! You humans use proper names because there are many of you, and it’s how you distinguish yourselves one from another. But there is only one God – ME! So why on earth (or in heaven, for that matter) would I need a proper name?’
Moses replied, ‘Point taken. But I still have to tell them something.’
God replied, ‘Just say “I AM has sent me to you.” I’ll take it from there.’
Genesis & Exodus proves it is absolute TRUTH = thus the word ELOHIM and Abraham Isaac JacobSeems as though you are assuming that whenever the plural form Elohim is found in the Torah, it must refer to more than one person/entity/being. But Exodus 7:1 proves that that cannot be true. (There is only one Moses!)
So how do you explain the use of Elohim in Exodus 7:1?Genesis & Exodus proves it is absolute TRUTH = thus the word ELOHIM and Abraham Isaac Jacob
You need to know who is speaking to Moses !!!
The Gospel (which was preached thru Abraham, Isaac & Jacob) explain it for us = Matthew ch3So how do you explain the use of Elohim in Exodus 7:1?
OKI asked you why Moses would be referred to as Elohim. Matthew chapter 3 surely does not answer that question.
That also proves the Holy Spirit is not a third person in the Godhead of the "trinity." If no one has seen the Father except the Son then the Holy Spirit hasn't seen the Father. If you would like, I will go an extra mile with you until you understand this.Have you never read "No one has seen the Father at any time except the Son who is in the Bosom of the Father."
I give Jews little credit for following the instructions of their God faithfully during their long and sorry history, but I do credit them with knowing how to interpret their own language.It’s interesting that you favor future tense over present tense here, when the Hebrew grammar allows for either to be correct. I’m not saying you’re wrong. But the overwhelming consensus of bible translations favors I AM over I WILL BE. Exodus 3:14 - Bible Gateway That should at least give you some pause here, shouldn’t it?
Reading the story in John 10:31-36, we see that just calling himself “the son of God” was blasphemous enough for them to pin that charge on him....after all, they wanted an excuse to silence him...he was making them look foolish and holding them to account for their poor performance with regard to “the lost sheep” to whom Jesus was sent.I will say that John 8:58 doesn’t help your cause. Whether or not Jesus’ “I AM” declaration was intended as a blasphemous identification with God (which is how he was understood, since the next verse mentions the effort to stone him), there is just no way to conclude that Jesus declared “I WILL BE.” So his audience must have favored the “I AM” interpretation of Exodus 3:14.
JESUS is reffering to mankind when He says "no one".That also proves the Holy Spirit is not a third person in the Godhead of the "trinity." If no one has seen the Father except the Son then the Holy Spirit hasn't seen the Father. If you would like, I will go an extra mile with you until you understand this.
Matthew 11
27All things have been entrusted to Me by My Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him.
In your limited mind there is no way around that.Well, I guess we're done here. "I have made thee a god (Elohim) to Pharaoh" uses a plural form of "God" to refer to a singular person, Moses. There is no way around that.
Our minds are limited but the Mind of Christ is not.Well, I guess we're done here. "I have made thee a god (Elohim) to Pharaoh" uses a plural form of "God" to refer to a singular person, Moses. There is no way around that.
Or the Holy Spirit isn't a person in the Godhead since the literal reading of the verse you quoted and I quoted allows for that interpretation. The "Holy Spirit" is sometimes a designation for God Himself, aka the Father or YHWH since God is Spirit and is also holy then He's Holy Spirit, not a seperate person.JESUS is reffering to mankind when He says "no one".
Keep going
The Holy Spirit makes decisions = Acts 16:6Or the Holy Spirit isn't a person in the Godhead since the literal reading of the verse you quoted and I quoted allows for that interpretation. The "Holy Spirit" is sometimes a designation for God Himself, aka the Father or YHWH since God is Spirit and is also holy then He's Holy Spirit, not a seperate person.
Think of it like this. You have a spirit, I have a spirit, everyone has their own spirit. Our spirit is not a sperate person to ourselves then it's also the same for God. I hope that helps.
2 Corinthians 2
11For who among men knows the thoughts of man except his own spirit within him? So too, no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God.
As I said before, God is Holy and Spirit, but His Spirit isn't a separate person to Himself. There is nothing conclusive about Acts 16:6 that says the Holy Spirit made a decision or if they were prevented via the power of their Holy Spirit anointing.The Holy Spirit makes decisions = Acts 16:6
You have not demonstrated the Holy Spirit is a separate person in the Godhead of your Trinity. That's my point here. I gave you good reasons why this isn't the case already.The Holy Spirit has Personhood as He is an inseperable part of ELOHIM = Acts 5:1-4 , Matt 12:32 , John 16:12-15
And there it is......the ultimate excuse for ignoring anything that might disagree with the indoctrination of Christendom’s teachings....Our minds are limited but the Mind of Christ is not.
We can experience and know Elohim but only thru Christ and the Holy Spirit.
And this is the ultimate irony....because that is exactly what you have done.Never isolate Scripture from Itself = we must see the entire focus of who Elohim is which requires ALL of Scripture
ALL of Scripture begins with the WORD.