The Lamb's blood does not cover anything, but only washes all past sinning away. It was the blood of bulls and goats that only covered sinful works.That would be those covered in His blood,
That would be those Christians saying they are no more condemned while sinning.Not those who think their poop doesn't smell.
I never respond to people changing words, in order to make them look ridiculous. When you show yourself dishonest, then I just move on. It's not all the time, so I don't just move on from you as a whole.I see. So God chose some evil person to fight Goliath and helped him? David's prayers were not heard while he was a young shepherd?
Actually there is only one Paul in the Bible. There are Christians such as yourself that teach another sinful kind of Paul.There were two Pauls now?
Your unbelief in walking as Jesus walked, and judging all Christians as sinful as you, is already established enough. I'll move on from pointing it out anymore.No. Nor some perfect puritan.
I will say however in all fairness, that you probably don't understand how you are mocking the righteousness of God, as well as Christians doing His righteousness at all times.
You probably think such last days mockers and scoffers are only unbelievers mocking Jesus Himself. This is not true. The mockers and scoffers that Paul, Peter, and Jude speak of, are of some Christian believers in the context of falling away from God's righteousness (2 Thess 2). They also begin to mock it and those doing it, as being 'perfect Puritans' and 'good little sisters', etc...
Once again that's the other Paul of another gospel that you preach, in order to justify your own continued sinning."Paul called himself “chief of sinners”
Self-identification is what self-improvement religion teaches. It's not the pure and perfect conversion of Jesus Christ.This self-identification is the discovery of every person whose eyes have been opened, whose conscience has been awakened, and whose heart has been pricked by the Holy Spirit.
Yes. Posture. The Bible calls it posturing in the faith. Paul specifically calls it a wilful humility of those who think talking about how they continue sinning as Christians, is being 'humble', rather than being condemned by their own words.It is the humble posture
True. That is the context. As a chiefest sinner, Paul spoke of being a persecutor and destroyer of the faith of Christ. Christians justifying themselves by calling Paul the chiefest of sinners as an apostle, are saying he was still persecuting the church and destroying the faith.If your idea were correct Paul would have said 'I WAS the chief of sinners'
The apostle Paul of the Bible was not.
Fair enough. I just repeat what you say about yourself and what you teach, without all your posturing humility.Why say it to me? Address the issues raised in discussion here, rather than to some supposed 'others'
One such example is that you talk and teach about how your works are still filthy rags, and so when you are rebuked for still living filthy, you get offended by it, as though you aren't still living filthy.
You see how I repeat your own words without the doctrinal self-justifying humility, and you get upset by your own words.
That's how it is with you, and I've seen it also with others. From now on, since you rightly demand it, I'll just speak of you and not of others. Unless I am reporting something others teach, that you do not agree with. An example of that is some Christians teach the resurrection is past.