BarneyFife
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure if it is a response to the OP, but I'm asking why restoration of the original diet (if Marriage is restored to the original, and the animals, themselves, will be restored to their original diet--if Messiah is a restorer of things to their original states) is optional.
It's really only optional relative to a believer's viewpoint and experience.
The main principles involved are the ethical treatment of animals, glorifying God in our bodies, and the duty to God as stewards of the human machinery—which is tied to the sanctity and preservation of human life.
Believers from different backgrounds are bound to be all over the map on this.
If you're familiar with Nat Geo's Dan Beuttner and the Blue Zones, you'll know that one of them are the Seventh-day Adventists that live in Loma Linda, California who are, actually the only BZ group that isn't losing their longevity edge in the wake of the healthcare failings of the last 10 years or so. They claim that their total lifestyle, including little or no animal products in their diet, is what keeps them alive and active up to a hundred years or more, and it's hard to refute their claims.
Mainstream science is getting on board with this, and it won't be long until all the major health authorities are compelled to change their official position to reflect the overwhelming evidence. Some already have. I won't name them here as it just seems to provide a place to slap a bullseye for information assasins.
I just heard today that the US government is considering changing the labeling of foods to classify items as "healthy" relative to their reduction of sodium, sugar, and saturated fat.
