Or like we see today in the news, especially with what we see in the back and forth over 'Climate Change', do they just try to validate their point of view. Now we know that Evolutionists claim to believe that all things have occurred by natural circumstances. Their belief in what formed the universe and we see especially when it comes to the earth are a mixture of the gods of evolution, time, chance and natural circumstances. However, it is very interesting to note that the evolutionist are never assured that the theory is correct and searches only to validate it, and discards what doesnt fit.
Dr. Carl Baugh, a creationist, at one time an evolutionist, gives some insight:
"The evolutionist is plagued with an immediate observation that the universe is somewhat in chaos. He interprets this as the second law of thermodynamics, which states that everything is increasing in random order, from complex to less complex. Actually, this second law of thermodynamics demands that there had to have been a time in the past when everything was in perfect synchronization; that is, orchestrial creation. But an evolutionist who is a philosophic or thinking evolutionist responds to the idea of deterioration of the universe, or a universe in disharmony. The evolutionist first finds this disharmony within himself; then he studies the biological world about him; he studies the stellar heavens; he assimilates all of the data; and he discovers that there is a marked discord. Thus, he literally responds and finds himself in harmony with an inharmonious universe.
Darwin himself had issues with it and said, "I shudder at seeing the human eye, it' so complicated." Darwin also wrote in his book in 1859, The Origin of Species, that if lifeforms, which are so complicated, cannot be explained by natural processes from preceding life, then his whole theory would fall to ruins. Evolutionist seem much like those saying the earth is getting too hot, or too cold before that, or was being destroyed by 'acid rain', they claim something then force the facts to fit the situation. Are they really giving us any real substance, or are they grasping at straws to validate evolution?
Dr. Carl Baugh, a creationist, at one time an evolutionist, gives some insight:
"The evolutionist is plagued with an immediate observation that the universe is somewhat in chaos. He interprets this as the second law of thermodynamics, which states that everything is increasing in random order, from complex to less complex. Actually, this second law of thermodynamics demands that there had to have been a time in the past when everything was in perfect synchronization; that is, orchestrial creation. But an evolutionist who is a philosophic or thinking evolutionist responds to the idea of deterioration of the universe, or a universe in disharmony. The evolutionist first finds this disharmony within himself; then he studies the biological world about him; he studies the stellar heavens; he assimilates all of the data; and he discovers that there is a marked discord. Thus, he literally responds and finds himself in harmony with an inharmonious universe.
Darwin himself had issues with it and said, "I shudder at seeing the human eye, it' so complicated." Darwin also wrote in his book in 1859, The Origin of Species, that if lifeforms, which are so complicated, cannot be explained by natural processes from preceding life, then his whole theory would fall to ruins. Evolutionist seem much like those saying the earth is getting too hot, or too cold before that, or was being destroyed by 'acid rain', they claim something then force the facts to fit the situation. Are they really giving us any real substance, or are they grasping at straws to validate evolution?
