The Way/Theosis/entire sanctification.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
36,682
24,021
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
@marks would you break down that verse to show how you understand it. Paul is saying, is he not, that his hearers were not yet completely sanctified but he was praying for that which would be when? And what about the blameless?
1 Thessalonians 5:23-24 KJV
23) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
24) Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

What we are looking for, you and I, here and now. A blessing spoken over the reader by Paul, that God would give entire sanctification.

Paul's prayer that God preserve - to guard from loss - their entire being in a blameless state. I'll confess that the body being preserved blameless is a bit of a mystery to me, unless he is referring to such as Philippians 3, "who shall transform the body of our humiliation to be like unto His glorious body".

lit. "In" the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Not that Paul is saying we reach a blameless state body soul spirit and maintain that until Jesus comes, rather, in His presence, His parousia.

This is from God's faithfulness to us, not our faithfulness to Him, and He assures He will in fact accomplish this. His committed assurance is the heart of this promise, and whatever it may mean that I have not grasped, it is His commitment to us to see us through.

Much love!

 
  • Like
Reactions: Hepzibah

christsavedme

Member
Jun 19, 2024
40
34
18
41
Berlin
Faith
Christian
Country
Germany
The doctrine we have been looking at - entire sanctification, and whether it is possible for man to be without sin in this life, was taught in the early church and called Theosis or Deification, and has been found in the west during the revival years and especially during the time of the Wesley's. The early church said that it occurs in three stages, but in the west, two stages generally though sometimes three, but it is not worth getting into disputes about it until the whole concept of holiness is understood.

This however requires that a person is seeking to know the truth rather than just having idle curiosity, and is willing to allow the Holy Spirit to reveal that it is truth, directly. It cannot come through human reasoning which gets in the way. I am greatly encouraged to see on this forum, signs that He is at work and has been giving revelations, on this most unusual forum, where this subject can be discussed freely.

After many years of reading, I know that nearly all or all other forums will stop the discussion out right so thank you @Wynona for this opportunity.


"These are the states of beginners, the state of progress, and the state of the perfect.
the {removed] into the "purgative way", the "illuminative way", and the "unitive way".

These consolations are often withdrawn, and a state of desolation ensues, and then the passive purification of the senses begins.

So ultimately purification, illumination, deification—it’s not the pursuit of enlightenment; it’s the pursuit of love: the love of God. It is the pursuit of a spiritual marriage, loving and receiving love. It is the marriage-feast, love being the wine that’s set forth on God’s table. In the deified man, it’s the man who is bathed in the light of God’s love to the point that it radiates from him. St. Isaac of Syria says:

God’s love is by its nature warmth. When it lights on someone without any limit, it plunges his soul into ecstasy. That is why the heart of one who has felt it cannot bear to be deprived of it, but he gradually undergoes a strange alteration in proportion to the love that enters into him. These are the signs of that love: His face becomes inflamed with joy, and his body is filled with warmth. Fear and shame desert him as if he had gone outside of himself.


This is the description of the Paul who says, “I know a man who was caught up into the third heaven, whether in the body or out of the body, I do not know.” httphttps://www.ancientfaith.com/specials/orthodox_spirituality/our_fulfillment_in_christ

Deification in the Early Church

In the introduction to The Study of Holiness from the Early Church Fathers by J. B. Galloway(Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2014), we read: “If the teachings of the modern holiness movement are correct concerning the doctrine of holiness and the baptism with the Holy Ghost as an experience for the saints of God today, perfecting them in Christian love and freeing them form carnal sin, it seems that we should find some evidences of this faith and teachings in the period of the history of the Church where it was the closest to the days of Christ”

“The commentator Adam Clarke objected that the opinion that Paul was speaking of a regenerate person ‘has most pitifully and most shamefully lowered the Standard of Christianity, and even destroyed its influence and disgraced its character.’ A.H. Francke and J. Bengel (and, a little later, John Wesley, and, later still Moses Stuart) were among those who thought that Paul was describing a man who was under conviction of sin, but not yet regenerate. “ Rom 7:24 – Who is the ‘wretched man’? – Walking With Giants

In his celebrated book Holiness, Ryle writes: ‘I am quite satisfied that it does not describe the experience of an unconverted man, or of a young and unestablished Christian; but of an old experienced saint in close communion with God. None but such a man could say, “I delight in the law of God after the inward man” (Rom. 7:22).’

The analysis of Christian development into these three ‘ways’ or phases derives from Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite, who ascribed a rhythm of purification, illumination, and union (or perfection) both to the hierarchies of angels and to the Church on earth. Medieval W. interpreters of Dionysius turned his scheme into an account of spiritual progress in terms of the three ways, beginning with the eradication of bad habits and the cultivation of the virtues, moving on to the illumination of the mind by meditation and contemplation, and culminating in unitive love. These three ways were adopted by later writers such as St John of the Cross and so became classic in systematic theories of Christian spirituality. purgative, illuminative, and unitive ways

St. Gregory Nazianzen, one of the great theologians of the fourth century, calls out to us over the centuries and exhorts us with the following. To quote St. Gregory: “Let us not remain what we are, but let us become what we once were.” And from St. Peter, the chief of the apostles, through the first-century voice of St. Ignatius of Antioch, from Irenaeus of the second century through the great Cappadocian Fathers of the fourth century, of the great Desert Fathers of the fifth century, Maximus the Confessor of the sixth century to John of Damascus and John of The Ladder in the ninth century, from Gregory Palamas in the 14th century to St. Silouan in the 20th century—the great Fathers of our Orthodox Church have echoed this exhortation of St. Gregory, reminding us and ever pointing us to the truth, that by God’s grace we can become much more than we are. [removed]
Your words have reminded me of the rich tradition of Christian spirituality, from the early Church Fathers to the great mystics and theologians of our time.

I am particularly struck by your emphasis on the importance of seeking truth and allowing the Holy Spirit to reveal it to us directly. This is a crucial aspect of our spiritual journey, as we seek to deepen our understanding of God's love and to become more like Christ.

Your reference to the three stages of spiritual growth - purification, illumination, and union - resonates deeply with me. These stages are not just theoretical concepts, but lived experiences that many of us have encountered on our own spiritual journeys. As we journey through these stages, we are constantly called to surrender ourselves to God's love, to let go of our attachments and our fears, and to trust in His providence.

I am also heartened by your mention of the great theologians and mystics of our tradition, such as St. Isaac of Syria, St. Gregory Nazianzen, and St. John of the Cross. Their writings and teachings have been a source of inspiration and guidance for countless generations of Christians, and continue to be so today.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Hepzibah
J

Johann

Guest
1 Thessalonians 5:23-24 KJV
23) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
24) Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

What we are looking for, you and I, here and now. A blessing spoken over the reader by Paul, that God would give entire sanctification.

Paul's prayer that God preserve - to guard from loss - their entire being in a blameless state. I'll confess that the body being preserved blameless is a bit of a mystery to me, unless he is referring to such as Philippians 3, "who shall transform the body of our humiliation to be like unto His glorious body".

lit. "In" the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Not that Paul is saying we reach a blameless state body soul spirit and maintain that until Jesus comes, rather, in His presence, His parousia.

This is from God's faithfulness to us, not our faithfulness to Him, and He assures He will in fact accomplish this. His committed assurance is the heart of this promise, and whatever it may mean that I have not grasped, it is His commitment to us to see us through.

Much love!
 
J

Johann

Guest
I have writings and homilies from the ECF' and excellent commentaries on this particular verse but most here are not interested in secondary sources.

1Th 5:21 But test N1all things carefully [so you can recognize what is good]. Hold firmly to that which is good.
1Th 5:22 Abstain from every form of evil [withdraw and keep away from it].
1Th 5:23 Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you through and through [that is, separate you from profane and vulgar things, make you pure and whole and undamaged--consecrated to Him--set apart for His purpose]; and may your spirit and soul and body be kept complete and [be found] blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
1Th 5:24 Faithful and absolutely trustworthy is He who is calling you [to Himself for your salvation], and He will do it [He will fulfill His call by making you holy, guarding you, watching over you, and protecting you as His own].
AMP
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
Your words have reminded me of the rich tradition of Christian spirituality, from the early Church Fathers to the great mystics and theologians of our time.

I am particularly struck by your emphasis on the importance of seeking truth and allowing the Holy Spirit to reveal it to us directly. This is a crucial aspect of our spiritual journey, as we seek to deepen our understanding of God's love and to become more like Christ.

Your reference to the three stages of spiritual growth - purification, illumination, and union - resonates deeply with me. These stages are not just theoretical concepts, but lived experiences that many of us have encountered on our own spiritual journeys. As we journey through these stages, we are constantly called to surrender ourselves to God's love, to let go of our attachments and our fears, and to trust in His providence.

I am also heartened by your mention of the great theologians and mystics of our tradition, such as St. Isaac of Syria, St. Gregory Nazianzen, and St. John of the Cross. Their writings and teachings have been a source of inspiration and guidance for countless generations of Christians, and continue to be so today.
Wow! Good to meet you!

I lived in Berlin for a while - in Lichterfelde West.

I read St John of the Cross quite a long time before reading the ECF and was greatly helped by him during a 'dark night of the soul'. So good to find someone else who has studied these great spiritual people.
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
1 Thessalonians 5:23-24 KJV
23) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
24) Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

What we are looking for, you and I, here and now. A blessing spoken over the reader by Paul, that God would give entire sanctification.

Paul's prayer that God preserve - to guard from loss - their entire being in a blameless state. I'll confess that the body being preserved blameless is a bit of a mystery to me, unless he is referring to such as Philippians 3, "who shall transform the body of our humiliation to be like unto His glorious body".

lit. "In" the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Not that Paul is saying we reach a blameless state body soul spirit and maintain that until Jesus comes, rather, in His presence, His parousia.

This is from God's faithfulness to us, not our faithfulness to Him, and He assures He will in fact accomplish this. His committed assurance is the heart of this promise, and whatever it may mean that I have not grasped, it is His commitment to us to see us through.

Much love!
Thank you Mark for answering the questions.
 

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Not sure I follow you here sister. There is surely one point of entry into Christ.
I'm not sure I do either (lol) but I will try to explain the best I can at the moment. We were all baptized into His death and resurrection when we underwent water baptism. There is a biblical principle of "first the natural then the spiritual." (This is also why some prophets were instructed/ordained by the Lord to do or act something out in the natural realm which was a picture or living parable of something that what was yet to come....what I call a prophetic act.....and as the Lord gave me understanding I think of water baptism as being a prophetic act, ordained by God and therefore having power) One baptism. And the water baptism leads to or seals us unto the spiritual baptism (or baptisms if there is a further one) to come. So really they are all of one, all of Christ and being baptized into Christ, one baptism into one Lord, but maybe we can think of it as going deeper into that baptism each time.
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I'm not sure I do either (lol) but I will try to explain the best I can at the moment. We were all baptized into His death and resurrection when we underwent water baptism.

I see where you are coming from however, I believe sister, that this interpretation came from Noah's ark where it saved eight people from the flood, and who were saved by 'water' as it were, and also the Jewish practice of water baptism of converts.
There is a biblical principle of "first the natural then the spiritual." (This is also why some prophets were instructed/ordained by the Lord to do or act something out in the natural realm which was a picture or living parable of something that what was yet to come....what I call a prophetic act.....and as the Lord gave me understanding I think of water baptism as being a prophetic act, ordained by God and therefore having power)

And yes, natural then spiritual and was prophetic of the baptism that Jesus would inaugurate, when He baptized with the Holy Spirit.
One baptism. And the water baptism leads to or seals us unto the spiritual baptism (or baptisms if there is a further one) to come. So really they are all of one, all of Christ and being baptized into Christ, one baptism into one Lord, but maybe we can think of it as going deeper into that baptism each time.

When John came to baptize with water, I believe he was showing the changeover that Christ would bring in the new covenant: the spiritual which was to take its place:

1 Peter 3:19By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; 20Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. 21The like figure *whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,)* by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: 22Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him.

Peter says that it is not the washing of the flesh ie water baptism that now saves us, as before, but the good conscience towards God that is to say, the holiness that the new Spirit baptism brings that now saves.
 

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
I see where you are coming from however, I believe sister, that this interpretation came from Noah's ark where it saved eight people from the flood, and who were saved by 'water' as it were, and also the Jewish practice of water baptism of converts.


And yes, natural then spiritual and was prophetic of the baptism that Jesus would inaugurate, when He baptized with the Holy Spirit.


When John came to baptize with water, I believe he was showing the changeover that Christ would bring in the new covenant: the spiritual which was to take its place:

1 Peter 3:19By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; 20Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. 21The like figure *whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,)* by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: 22Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him.

Peter says that it is not the washing of the flesh ie water baptism that now saves us, as before, but the good conscience towards God that is to say, the holiness that the new Spirit baptism brings that now saves.
I gather you believe that whenever "baptism" is written without explicit reference to water, that it is referring to the Holy Spirit....? I think that should be looked at. Baptism refers to water baptism except two occasions when once John the Baptist referred to baptism of the Holy Spirit and Jesus once repeated it. They were using the analogy of water baptism applied to the giving of the Holy Spirit, not the other way around. We don't see it referred to as Spirit baptism again as far as I could find (correct me if I'm wrong) except when Peter was recalling that Jesus had said that. When the NT writers wanted to express the pouring out/receiving of the Holy Spirit they said so explicitly, making explicit mention of the Holy Spirit. And there were a number of different ways they expressed it without using the term baptize/baptism. Where we see the term baptism by itself without mentioning the Holy Spirit, it is generally talking about water baptism, unless there were exceptions to this that I haven't found.

John was the last of the old covenant prophets....people were undergoing a Jewish mikvah for repentance....I believe according to the Law. But after Jesus' death and resurrection....the early church of the new covenant were water baptizing new believers in the name of Jesus. Even those who had been baptized by John still needed to be baptized in the name of Jesus. It is a new covenant practice ordained and commanded by Jesus. And because it is ordained, like the Lord's supper, there is power in it.

Our consciences were cleansed when we came to faith....water baptism only profits for someone who has come to faith.
 
J

Johann

Guest
I gather you believe that whenever "baptism" is written without explicit reference to water, that it is referring to the Holy Spirit....? I think that should be looked at. Baptism refers to water baptism except two occasions when once John the Baptist referred to baptism of the Holy Spirit and Jesus once repeated it. They were using the analogy of water baptism applied to the giving of the Holy Spirit, not the other way around. We don't see it referred to as Spirit baptism again as far as I could find (correct me if I'm wrong) except when Peter was recalling that Jesus had said that. When the NT writers wanted to express the pouring out/receiving of the Holy Spirit they said so explicitly, making explicit mention of the Holy Spirit. And there were a number of different ways they expressed it without using the term baptize/baptism. Where we see the term baptism by itself without mentioning the Holy Spirit, it is generally talking about water baptism, unless there were exceptions to this that I haven't found.

John was the last of the old covenant prophets....people were undergoing a Jewish mikvah for repentance....I believe according to the Law. But after Jesus' death and resurrection....the early church of the new covenant were water baptizing new believers in the name of Jesus. Even those who had been baptized by John still needed to be baptized in the name of Jesus. It is a new covenant practice ordained and commanded by Jesus. And because it is ordained, like the Lord's supper, there is power in it.

Our consciences were cleansed when we came to faith....water baptism only profits for someone who has come to faith.
This topic of "water baptism and the law" only brings division among the saints, as we are reminded in 1 Corinthians 1:10 (NKJV):
"Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment."

And in Titus 3:9 (NKJV):
"But avoid foolish disputes, genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and useless."

J.
 

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
This topic of "water baptism and the law" only brings division among the saints, as we are reminded in 1 Corinthians 1:10 (NKJV):
"Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment."

And in Titus 3:9 (NKJV):
"But avoid foolish disputes, genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and useless."

J.
Thanks brother. We are not disputing about water baptism per se but trying to sort out what "one baptism" is being referred to in Eph 4 where it mentions one faith, one Lord, one baptism. Also, if someone has a theology that says every time "baptism" is referred to it is talking about Spirit baptism (unless I'm misunderstanding), I think that needs to be examined too, like good Bereans. ;) I might not pursue this anyway, haven't been feeling up to par lately. Not that my par is up to par at the best of times these days anyhow, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I gather you believe that whenever "baptism" is written without explicit reference to water, that it is referring to the Holy Spirit....? I think that should be looked at. Baptism refers to water baptism except two occasions when once John the Baptist referred to baptism of the Holy Spirit and Jesus once repeated it. They were using the analogy of water baptism applied to the giving of the Holy Spirit, not the other way around. We don't see it referred to as Spirit baptism again as far as I could find (correct me if I'm wrong) except when Peter was recalling that Jesus had said that. When the NT writers wanted to express the pouring out/receiving of the Holy Spirit they said so explicitly, making explicit mention of the Holy Spirit. And there were a number of different ways they expressed it without using the term baptize/baptism. Where we see the term baptism by itself without mentioning the Holy Spirit, it is generally talking about water baptism, unless there were exceptions to this that I haven't found.
Lizbeth, any texts that can rightly be interpreted as referring to water baptism, do not prove that it was commanded. It only proves that it was still taking place, and we know that circumcision was likewise, without commandment.

John's baptism, a figure to be replaced by substance, was only commanded for a time, as he said 'He must increase, but I must decrease' John 3:30, in the same way that that which was proscribed by Moses, as many ceremonies and observations were types and shadows, which consisted of washings, outward purifications and cleansings, were to be revealed in due time, when spiritual worship was set up, and carnal, ceremonial ordinances were no more. It derogates from the New Covenant dispensation.

In Matt 3:11, John mentions two different baptisms, whereof he was the minister of one and the other of which Christ was the minister. He was pointing out that, with the baptism of water, he was declaring that neither could he, nor did he, baptize with the Spirit, then the baptism with water was not the baptism of Christ, which Peter tells us saves. If the two were one, why should he have so precisely contraindicate them?

Moreover, if it was to continue, Jesus would have practiced it Himself, and clearly instructed His disciples to do so .

Scripture tells us that neither does anything man eats, fits him for heaven and whereby even the most evil of men may partake. Plainly there is one baptism as there is one faith and one God. The laws of the New Covenant are inward and perpetually written on the heart. The worship of Jesus was carnal and outward, limited to a set time. Worship in the Spirit is not limited to time, place, or persons, but is performed in the Spirit and in Truth.

John was the last of the old covenant prophets....people were undergoing a Jewish mikvah for repentance....I believe according to the Law. But after Jesus' death and resurrection....the early church of the new covenant were water baptizing new believers in the name of Jesus. Even those who had been baptized by John still needed to be baptized in the name of Jesus. It is a new covenant practice ordained and commanded by Jesus. And because it is ordained, like the Lord's supper, there is power in it.

Our consciences were cleansed when we came to faith....water baptism only profits for someone who has come to faith.
 

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Lizbeth, any texts that can rightly be interpreted as referring to water baptism, do not prove that it was commanded. It only proves that it was still taking place, and we know that circumcision was likewise, without commandment.

John's baptism, a figure to be replaced by substance, was only commanded for a time, as he said 'He must increase, but I must decrease' John 3:30, in the same way that that which was proscribed by Moses, as many ceremonies and observations were types and shadows, which consisted of washings, outward purifications and cleansings, were to be revealed in due time, when spiritual worship was set up, and carnal, ceremonial ordinances were no more. It derogates from the New Covenant dispensation.

In Matt 3:11, John mentions two different baptisms, whereof he was the minister of one and the other of which Christ was the minister. He was pointing out that, with the baptism of water, he was declaring that neither could he, nor did he, baptize with the Spirit, then the baptism with water was not the baptism of Christ, which Peter tells us saves. If the two were one, why should he have so precisely contraindicate them?

Moreover, if it was to continue, Jesus would have practiced it Himself, and clearly instructed His disciples to do so .

Scripture tells us that neither does anything man eats, fits him for heaven and whereby even the most evil of men may partake. Plainly there is one baptism as there is one faith and one God. The laws of the New Covenant are inward and perpetually written on the heart. The worship of Jesus was carnal and outward, limited to a set time. Worship in the Spirit is not limited to time, place, or persons, but is performed in the Spirit and in Truth.
I take your point about Jesus baptizing in the Spirit and being the minister of a new covenant in the spirit and that the coming of the Holy Spirit is what had long been promised and that it is superior to water baptism....amen. But does the Lord's supper derogate from the new covenant? Most people don't really know why they are being water baptized the same as they don't know why they are having communion.......until He comes? Teaching about "baptisms" is considered foundational in Hebrews 6. Water baptism was so important that some were being baptized for the dead (by proxy) who I assume had come to faith in Christ but had been unable to be baptized before they died. I have seen people who received Jesus but didn't get baptized and watched them fall into sin and doubting their faith. They were lacking strength for some reason. I see water baptism as being like a necessary first step of crossing over into being committed and entering into covenant with God. Remaining on the other side of baptism there seems to be more wavering, less strength and commitment. God blesses water baptism to accomplish what He ordained it for, the same as He does communion.

Here some had been baptized by John or his disciples.....but then were baptized into Jesus, in His name, after learning that John was leading them to Him, before Paul laid hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit:

Act 19:1-6

And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,

He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.


And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
I take your point about Jesus baptizing in the Spirit and being the minister of a new covenant in the spirit and that the coming of the Holy Spirit is what had long been promised and that it is superior to water baptism....amen. But does the Lord's supper derogate from the new covenant? Most people don't really know why they are being water baptized the same as they don't know why they are having communion.......until He comes? Teaching about "baptisms" is considered foundational in Hebrews 6. Water baptism was so important that some were being baptized for the dead (by proxy) who I assume had come to faith in Christ but had been unable to be baptized before they died. I have seen people who received Jesus but didn't get baptized and watched them fall into sin and doubting their faith. They were lacking strength for some reason. I see water baptism as being like a necessary first step of crossing over into being committed and entering into covenant with God. Remaining on the other side of baptism there seems to be more wavering, less strength and commitment. God blesses water baptism to accomplish what He ordained it for, the same as He does communion.

Here some had been baptized by John or his disciples.....but then were baptized into Jesus, in His name, after learning that John was leading them to Him, before Paul laid hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit:

Act 19:1-6

And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,

He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.


And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
Here Peter commanded and baptized some who had already received the Holy spirit but hadn't yet been water baptized:

Act 10:44-48

While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.

And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.

For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,

Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?

And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord
. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

(And just to say, from my observation it is better to be water baptized ASAP after coming to faith....before the devil has a chance to put up all kinds of obstacles and hindrances and objections in the way. As the eunuch said to Philip (paraphrasing) Look here is some water....what does HINDER me from being baptized?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I take your point about Jesus baptizing in the Spirit and being the minister of a new covenant in the spirit and that the coming of the Holy Spirit is what had long been promised and that it is superior to water baptism....amen. But does the Lord's supper derogate from the new covenant?

For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come. 1 Cor 11:26.

The disciples were told to continue with the ritual, of demonstrating His death, till He returned to them alive, which He did after three days, which was a symbol of His return/illumination to those who had lost His presence due to the trial of purgation and conviction of their sins as believers. Only the illumined can witness to this return, the rest will scorn. So continuing the supper, is for those who have not known His 'death' within and His 'resurrection' in themselves.
Most people don't really know why they are being water baptized the same as they don't know why they are having communion.......until He comes? Teaching about "baptisms" is considered foundational in Hebrews 6. Water baptism was so important that some were being baptized for the dead (by proxy) who I assume had come to faith in Christ but had been unable to be baptized before they died.

I am guessing you are an ex-Mormon or at least a RC. The baptism for the dead is highly disputed and the consensus is that we cannot know what it means. I think that Paul was using their mistaken practice to demonstrate what he was saying ie why would they do that? There seems to have been a great deal of confusion over baptism.
I have seen people who received Jesus but didn't get baptized and watched them fall into sin and doubting their faith. They were lacking strength for some reason. I see water baptism as being like a necessary first step of crossing over into being committed and entering into covenant with God.

I suppose it could help those that have made a public demonstration, to be more reluctant to backslide. For myself it made no difference whatsoever till I was baptized in the Spirit much later. It is easy for us to imagine magical things when encouraged. Mormons are big on baptism are they not?
Remaining on the other side of baptism there seems to be more wavering, less strength and commitment. God blesses water baptism to accomplish what He ordained it for, the same as He does communion.

I don't see that written.
Here some had been baptized by John or his disciples.....but then were baptized into Jesus, in His name, after learning that John was leading them to Him, before Paul laid hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit:

Act 19:1-6

And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,

He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.


And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.

I don't regard that as clear. Paul said he was no sent to baptize (water). The last two verses could be something that occurred at the same time. There is no indication that it was with water.
 
Last edited:

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
Here Peter commanded and baptized some who had already received the Holy spirit but hadn't yet been water baptized:

Act 10:44-48

While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.

And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.

For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,

Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?

And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord
. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

(And just to say, from my observation it is better to be water baptized ASAP after coming to faith....before the devil has a chance to put up all kinds of obstacles and hindrances and objections in the way. As the eunuch said to Philip (paraphrasing) Look here is some water....what does HINDER me from being baptized?)

Peter, the one who commanded circumcision right?
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
@Lizbeth, we are getting distracted from the reason for the thread. It is not in my remit to debate water baptism, I am answering you without deep study. That is not to say that I think I may be wrong.
 
Last edited:

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come. 1 Cor 11:26.

The disciples were told to continue with the ritual, of demonstrating His death, till He returned to them alive, which He did after three days, which was a symbol of His return/illumination to those who had lost His presence due to the trial of purgation and conviction of their sins as believers. Only the illumined can witness to this return, the rest will scorn. So continuing the supper, is for those who have not known His 'death' within and His 'resurrection' in themselves.
It's not a mere ritual but there is power in it. If there is power in the Lord's supper such that people are dying/falling asleep because of treating it as a common thing then there is power in it period. Power to accomplish the purpose for which Jesus ordained it for believers. Which is to re-fresh His sacrifice to us, so to speak, as we examine ourselves and confess sins and bring any sins to the cross as we have need. It is a washing of our feet, because "we offend in many ways all". And this is why Jesus washed the disciples feet at that last passover.

Your second point there......as the early believers were left bereft of the presence of Jesus for 10 days after He ascended and before the Holy Spirit was poured out and in Rev it refers to 10 days of tribulation......that is why I mentioned His coming.....I am considering whether some of these things were a pattern for us. And the three days also that you mentioned, yes.

I am guessing you are an ex-Mormon or at least a RC. The baptism for the dead is highly disputed and the consensus is that we cannot know what it means. I think that Paul was using their mistaken practice to demonstrate what he was saying ie why would they do that? There seems to have been a great deal of confusion over baptism.
No, never been Mormon. Was raised in the Catholic church as a child, but had never even heard of such a thing as being baptized for the dead until I saw that in scripture when the Lord led me to be baptized for a close relative who had died, having come to faith but she had not been water baptized. Paul does not censure or correct the practice but treats it as legitimate. I think we must be led by the Spirit for such things though and not by rote. And I know I did the right thing in eventually obeying (was reluctant at first, but the Lord kept insisting) because the Holy Spirit came and put a song in my mouth as I came up out of the water.

I suppose it could help those that have made a public demonstration, to be more reluctant to backslide.
Oh ye of little faith. ;) (on that matter, I don't mean generally)

For myself it made no difference whatsoever till I was baptized in the Spirit much later. It is easy for us to imagine magical things when encouraged.
I don't think anybody could know how it affected them going forward. I just observed that lack of strength with people I had known who hadn't been baptized. And that revelation of baptism as being a prophetic act.....it seals something in the spirit.

Mormons are big on baptism are they not?
So I found out. That's why I couldn't find anyone to baptize me for that one who was deceased and ended up doing it myself in my bathtub. The Mormon's approach to it discredits something that is legitimate in the Lord.....nothing new under the sun with that. The flesh is always handling things of God wrong much to the devil's delight. I've learned never to be put off things of God just because someone or some group is handling it wrong. We would never launch out in faith and do anything in that case, just sit in a bunker with a tin hat on, because everything gets mishandled somewhere at some time by someone. That someone is doing something in a wrong way, is NOT an argument in itself, against that thing itself. We are in a battle and the devil is always seeking to discredit legitimate things of God.

I don't see that written.
What we do see written is what baptism is a clear picture of. Being baptized into His death and being raised to newness of life. A prophetic act.....we need the Holy Spirit to give us understanding that there is power in obeying the Lord in something HE is ordaining.

I don't regard that as clear. Paul said he was no sent to baptize (water). The last two verses could be something that occurred at the same time. There is no indication that it was with water.
I gather as the church was growing it was taking up too much of his time, like waiting on tables, when he had a more important mission that he needed to concentrate on, so he needed to delegate certain things. Yes, it could have occurred at the same time...there are a lot of testimonies of people being filled with the Spirit as they come up out of the water.
 

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Peter, the one who commanded circumcision right?
Yes Peter erred on that.....and was duly corrected by Paul. There is no correction anywhere in scripture for all the water baptisms of people being baptized into Jesus, in His name, that were taking place in the early church.
 

Lizbeth

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2022
4,384
5,833
113
67
Ontario, Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
@Lizbeth, we are getting distracted from the reason for the thread. It is not in my remit to debate water baptism, I am answering you without deep study. That is not to say that I think I may be wrong.
It is important to the topic I believe , as it seems to form some of your background theology on theosis, but I know it's a lot to hash out in writing. Anyway I will leave it there. Just maybe keep it on a back burner for now. We all have some things that need tweeking I'm sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann