Ah, I would say that we are
We can't be both the type and anti-type.
Stranger
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ah, I would say that we are
The patriarchs ("arche") are the types for us...as well as the anti-pats I guess, Judas, Edom, etcWe can't be both the type and anti-type.
Stranger
ha don't be too sure :)We can't be both the type and anti-type.
Stranger
ha don't be too sure :)
Well not disagreeing--except maybe to the top, where I suspect we are discussing at cross-purposes anyway--ha and even kudos, we turn out to be both Adam and Eve after all huh, but really I suggest that you cannot see either of them with your eyes, nor touch them with your hands, right.No, we can't. You have the type and you have that which the type typifies.
And, just because one is the type doesn't mean it wasn't real. Adam is a type of Christ. Eve is a type of the Church. Both are real.
Stranger
By @Dave L
As I came to believe over time, God only gives persevering faith and the witness of the Spirit to those for whom Christ died. If I were not one of them, I would not believe in Christ. I'd love sin more than God and return to my evil ways.
ah, why do you say?This thread is the same old attempts by some that want to separate any idea about Israel apart from Christ's Church
Did you stop to think how ridiculous this sounds?Who would want to try and separate Christ's future Kingdom of Israel apart from His Church? Those like the unbelieving Pharisees of course, because Jesus took His Kingdom away from them! (Matthew 21 with the parable of the husbandmen).
Did you stop to think how ridiculous this sounds?
1. Humans have no power to separate the kingdom of Israel from the Church. That is solely God's prerogative and privilege, and He Himself makes this distinction.
2. You are equating Christians who reject your incorrect understand of God's plans and purposes with unbelieving Pharisees. That is an insult to both Christians and Christ. But it shows that you yourself do not know how to rightly divide the Word of Truth, while bearing false witness.
3. Had you taken the time to study Romans 11 carefully you would have discovered that the New Testament itself teaches that after the full number of Gentiles has been added to the Church, God will resume His direct dealings with Israel and the Jews AFTER the Second Coming of Christ. Which means that you are the one who is not in sync with God's plans and purposes.
....
Why did you stop with the unbelieving scribes and Pharisees? They are not the ones who determine when Christ's real, visible, physical and spiritual, tangible Kingdom will be established on earth.What's truly ridiculous are those who keep screaming 'Replacement Theology' when Jesus Himself was clear that He removed His Kingdom from the care of the scribes and Pharisees who rejected Him.
Why did you stop with the unbelieving scribes and Pharisees? They are not the ones who determine when Christ's real, visible, physical and spiritual, tangible Kingdom will be established on earth.
Why did you not follow through with the believing apostles who asked this question: When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? (Acts 1:6)
1. Did the Lord rebuke them for asking this legitimate question? NO
2. Did the Lord tell them that that expectation was sheer nonsense, and that the only Kingdom would be an invisible and spiritual Kingdom? NO
3. Did the Lord tell them that the Church had replaced Israel, so the question was moot? NO
How did the Lord respond? It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. (Acts 1:7,8)
So you are prepared to reject what Christ says about His Kingdom in order to cling to your bogus theology? Exactly what happens in 99.9% of all cases. People simply do not want to acknowledge God's truth from God's Word today.Nah, you can't use what He said in Acts 1 as an excuse for His Kingdom being established based on any... Jew's beliefs.
So you are prepared to reject what Christ says about His Kingdom in order to cling to your bogus theology? Exactly what happens in 99.9% of all cases. People simply do not want to acknowledge God's truth from God's Word today.
Since Christ was a Jew -- a Hebrew of the Hebrews -- you don't really want to believe that it is that Jewish Messiah who will eventually establish the Jewish kingdom of Israel on earth, with the 12 tribes in the land of Israel. You really don't want to believe that it is the Holy Spirit who said through Paul "And so all Israel shall be saved". In other words, what is plainly stated in Scripture means nothing to you.
So you are prepared to reject what Christ says about His Kingdom in order to cling to your bogus theology? Exactly what happens in 99.9% of all cases. People simply do not want to acknowledge God's truth from God's Word today.
Since Christ was a Jew -- a Hebrew of the Hebrews -- you don't really want to believe that it is that Jewish Messiah who will eventually establish the Jewish kingdom of Israel on earth, with the 12 tribes in the land of Israel. You really don't want to believe that it is the Holy Spirit who said through Paul "And so all Israel shall be saved". In other words, what is plainly stated in Scripture means nothing to you.
You are the one who making a false doctrine by calling Gentiles "Ephraim" and "all Israel". Ephraim is clearly shown as one of the twelve tribes and identified as "Joseph" in Revelation 7 (since Ephraim was one of the sons of Joseph), and as actual Ephraim in Ezekiel 48. So let's look at the Scriptures, not FLIGHTS OF FANCY.Do a better study than just misunderstanding one verse and making a false doctrine from it.