The absurdity of Pretrib logic

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,733
4,441
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is right here in Revelation 12:10 of when all Israel, i.e. Israel the nation as a whole.

10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
I don't know what you are saying here. That verse is present tense. Surely, "salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ" has already come! Do you think salvation has not yet come? Do you think you are not yet in the kingdom of God? Has the power of Christ not yet come in your mind?

If Revelation 12:10 was not yet fulfilled, then the following verse would not yet be fulfilled:

Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

Of course there is only one way to be saved. And for the past 2000 years, every day there have been individual Jews saved by believing in Jesus.
And some of them were previously blinded temporarily and were provoked to jealousy by the salvation of Gentiles. Just like in Paul's day (Romans 11:11-14).

But Romans 11:25, is talking about Israel, the nation, as a whole. Israel as a whole, i.e. all of the Jews will turn to Christ in Revelation 12:10, in the middle of the forthcoming 7 year 70th week - after the fulness of the Gentiles be come in - i.e. after the rapture.
You have to ignore everything Paul said up to that point in order to draw that conclusion. Israel was already blinded in part in His day and the blindness was being removed from "some of them" in his day. You can't just ignore that. It started back then and would continue "until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in".
 

CadyandZoe

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
7,658
2,625
113
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Show me the doctrine using scripture.
It is vivid that we are 3 part, and the spirit is eternal
It is you invoking philosophy as a qualifier
What doctrine am I defending? We were discussing our presuppositions—ideas we BRING to the text. I am aware that the Bible often lists the body, soul, and spirit together, but this doesn't necessarily mean that each of these can exist apart from the other.
 

Douggg

Well-Known Member
Nov 26, 2020
3,464
263
83
76
Memphis
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
don't know what you are saying here. That verse is present tense.
It is present tense, in relation to when Satan is cast down to in earth in the previous verse, in the middle part of the forthcoming 7 year 70th week.

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.

Verse 10 is when all of Israel, the nation, will be saved.

Israel is currently not a Christian nation. When do you think Israel will become a Christian nation?

Revelation 12...
verses 1-5 A historic look at the woman, to identify her as Israel. And Satan's desire to destroy her.
verse 6 She is fed the word of God by the two witnesses for the first 1260 days of the 7 years, as they testify of Jesus.
verse 7-9 A war in the second heaven, which Satan and his angels are then cast down to earth.
verse 10 Israel turns to Jesus and the gospel of Salvation. Due to the testimony of the two witnesses.
verse 11 As a result of coming to Christ, Israel overcomes Satan's desire to destroy her.
verse 12 Them in heaven rejoice, because the end of Satan's hold over the nations is at hand. His time is short.
verse 13 Satan, in his wrath will persecute Israel
verse 14 Them of Israel, who heed Christ's words to flee into the mountain wilderness, as soon as the abomination of desolation is setup, is protected from Satan's persecution for a time, times, half time. The second half of the 7 years.
verse 15-16 Satan attempts to destroy Israel in the wilderness, by sending armies after her, but those are destroyed by supernatural means, such as earthquakes, causing mountain slides.
verse 17 Them of Israel, who did not flee right away into the mountain wilderness become vulnerable to the persecution of Satan for the time, times, half time. To be rescued in Zechariah 14, when Jesus returns, His Second Coming.
 
Last edited:

CadyandZoe

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
7,658
2,625
113
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You misrepresented God's word

Ironically. By doing what you did, that same Greek word is used for the Father Jehovah

You are calling Jehovah "a god"

Again using philosophy to qualify what you are asserting
I didn't misrepresent God's word. Jesus is engaged in a conversation with the religious leaders of his community. They are debating whether he, as a man, has the right to call himself the Son of God. To defend his position, Jesus refers to the Psalms, citing a passage where men are referred to as "gods." He uses this to refute their argument that the Messiah cannot be a human being. This same point is also made by Paul in Hebrews chapters one and two. Jesus being a man does not disqualify him from being the Messiah.

Jesus argues that it is right for the ancients to consider that a king represents God. And David, his ancestor, was in wonder when he was told that a son from his own body would sit and rule on his throne forever. The Gospel teaches us that Jesus Christ, alone, is the "one-of-a-kind" representative of God, because Jesus is uniquely qualified to represent God perfectly.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,733
4,441
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is present tense, in relation to when Satan is cast down to in earth in the previous verse, in the middle part of the forthcoming 7 year 70th week.
No, it is present tense as of the time it was written. You didn't answer my questions, Doug. Why not?

Please address what I said.

I said that surely, "salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ" has already come! Do you think salvation has not yet come? Do you think you are not yet in the kingdom of God? Has the power of Christ not yet come in your mind? Please answer these questions.

If Revelation 12:10 was not yet fulfilled, then the following verse would not yet be fulfilled:

Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

Please tell me how Romans 1:16 could be fulfilled if Revelation 12:10 is not yet fulfilled. It indicates that salvation has come, and that kingdom of our God and the power of Christ has come.


9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.

Verse 10 is when all of Israel, the nation, will be saved.

Israel is currently not a Christian nation. When do you think Israel will become a Christian nation?
Never. Scripture never teaches such a thing as a "Christian nation". Do you not believe that God is not a respecter of persons? Why would Israel become a Christian nation but not any other nation? That would show favoritism by God, but He is not a respecter of persons and does not show favoritism in relation to salvation.

Acts 10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: 35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

God does not do anything for any particular person or nation that He doesn't do for every person and nation when it comes to salvation.

Revelation 12...
verses 1-5 A historic look at the woman, to identify her as Israel. And Satan's desire to destroy her.
verse 6 She is fed the word of God by the two witnesses for the first 1260 days of the 7 years, as they testify of Jesus.
verse 7-9 A war in the second heaven, which Satan and his angels are then cast down to earth.
verse 10 Israel turns to Jesus and the gospel of Salvation. Due to the testimony of the two witnesses.
verse 11 As a result of coming to Christ, Israel overcomes Satan's desire to destroy her.
verse 12 Them in heaven rejoice, because the end of Satan's hold over the nations is at hand. His time is short.
verse 13 Satan, in his wrath will persecute Israel
verse 14 Them of Israel, who heed Christ's words to flee into the mountain wilderness, as soon as the abomination of desolation is setup, is protected from Satan's persecution for a time, times, half time. The second half of the 7 years.
verse 15-16 Satan attempts to destroy Israel in the wilderness, by sending armies after her, but those are destroyed by supernatural means, such as earthquakes, causing mountain slides.
verse 17 Them of Israel, who did not flee right away into the mountain wilderness become vulnerable to the persecution of Satan for the time, times, half time. To be rescued in Zechariah 14, when Jesus returns, His Second Coming.
The only children of the woman that are referenced in Revelation 12 are Christ (verse 5) and those "which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." which refers to all Christians. That's it. Who does scripture say is the mother of those who "keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ"? The nation of Israel or earthly Jerusalem? No.

Galatians 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. 25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

Doug, you fail to use the wise method of interpreting scripture with scripture and that results in you interpreting one scripture a certain way that contradicts other scripture. Why not make things easier on yourself to look and see how other scripture identifies the woman/mother of those who "keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ"? Does those who belong to Christ have more than one mother? Of course not. Your method of interpreting scripture is reckless because there is no care put into making sure you are not making scripture contradict itself.
 

rebuilder 454

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2023
3,528
886
113
69
robstown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I didn't misrepresent God's word. Jesus is engaged in a conversation with the religious leaders of his community. They are debating whether he, as a man, has the right to call himself the Son of God. To defend his position, Jesus refers to the Psalms, citing a passage where men are referred to as "gods." He uses this to refute their argument that the Messiah cannot be a human being. This same point is also made by Paul in Hebrews chapters one and two. Jesus being a man does not disqualify him from being the Messiah.

Jesus argues that it is right for the ancients to consider that a king represents God. And David, his ancestor, was in wonder when he was told that a son from his own body would sit and rule on his throne forever. The Gospel teaches us that Jesus Christ, alone, is the "one-of-a-kind" representative of God, because Jesus is uniquely qualified to represent God perfectly.
The Father calls him God.
The Father commands angels to worship Him.
Both found in Hebrews ch 1.

Done deal.
The Father is the alpha and omega

Jesus is the alpha and omega

We worship Jesus.
Correctly so
 
  • Like
Reactions: honeycomb

Keraz

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2018
6,172
1,072
113
83
Thames, New Zealand
www.logostelos.info
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
Doug, you fail to use the wise method of interpreting scripture with scripture and that results in you interpreting one scripture a certain way that contradicts other scripture. Why not make things easier on yourself to look and see how other scripture identifies the woman/mother of those who "keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ"? Does those who belong to Christ have more than one mother? Of course not. Your method of interpreting scripture is reckless because there is no care put into making sure you are not making scripture contradict itself.
Douggg and all the believers in the 'rapture to heaven' theory, have to have the Jewish nation on earth, while they do harp practise in heaven. Their belief is a fable and they simply seem to be unable to understand the many Prophesies which say how Jewish Israel will be virtually destroyed and only a Christian remnant saved. Isaiah 22:14 tells it plainly.
 

Douggg

Well-Known Member
Nov 26, 2020
3,464
263
83
76
Memphis
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No, it is present tense as of the time it was written.
Revelation was written in the first century. Verse 10 did not take place in first century. Revelation 12 reveals things yet to come, during the forthcoming 7 year 70th week, when Satan is cast down to earth, having but a time, times, half time left.

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.

The tenses of verbs in individual verses in Revelation have to be understood within the context of what John was told and shown.

For example, in Revelation 11:14 The second woe is past; and, behold, the third woe cometh quickly. It does not mean that the any of that took place back in the first century, although the verse verb is present tense, and reflects some of the past.

Please address what I said.

I said that surely, "salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ" has already come! Do you think salvation has not yet come? Do you think you are not yet in the kingdom of God? Has the power of Christ not yet come in your mind? Please answer these questions.
Israel, the nation as a whole has yet to embrace the gospel of salvation.

The issue is not whether the gospel of salvation is foundational to persons being Christians. The issue is when the woman in Revelation 12 embraces it and Jesus.

Never. Scripture never teaches such a thing as a "Christian nation". Do you not believe that God is not a respecter of persons? Why would Israel become a Christian nation but not any other nation? That would show favoritism by God, but He is not a respecter of persons and does not show favoritism in relation to salvation.

The rest of the world considers the United States a Christian nation, because the majority of Americans are Christians.

Israel is not considered a Christian nation because most of its population are not Christians.

Israel the nation, its total population that are descended from the twelve tribes, will turn to Jesus and the gospel of salvation in the middle part of the forthcoming middle part 7 year 70th week. That is when all Israel will be saved. After the rapture, when the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.
 
Last edited:

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
4,233
1,904
113
73
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Hi. …
John (God, actually) is saying no time left in this age (dispensation). After the millennium and the great white throne judgment, the New Jerusalem and eternity await, and this time will be forever and ever and ever! :woohoo!:

Yes, but who shall inhabit New Jerusalem? In the New Jerusalem there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither pain "FOR THE FORMER THINGS ARE PASSED AWAY"! The New Jerusalem shall be after the first heaven and the first earth have passed away. That's why TIME given this age for building the Kingdom of God shall be no longer. This time, John writes "a thousand years" shall be finished, then comes the judgement, and the new heaven and a new earth. There won't be any unbelievers still alive to inhabit New Jerusalem for one thousand years that is the time for calling on the name of the Lord to be saved is finished.

Revelation 21:1-4 (KJV) And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
 

honeycomb

Active Member
Jul 17, 2024
207
163
43
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yes, but who shall inhabit New Jerusalem? In the New Jerusalem there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither pain "FOR THE FORMER THINGS ARE PASSED AWAY"! The New Jerusalem shall be after the first heaven and the first earth have passed away. That's why TIME given this age for building the Kingdom of God shall be no longer. This time, John writes "a thousand years" shall be finished, then comes the judgement, and the new heaven and a new earth. There won't be any unbelievers still alive to inhabit New Jerusalem for one thousand years that is the time for calling on the name of the Lord to be saved is finished.

Revelation 21:1-4 (KJV) And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
Only the Christian overcomers will live in the New Jerusalem. All the former things, all the wicked people, all the evil spirits, all corruptible flesh–all these things are passed away, GONE!

The New Jerusalem (Eternity) is established after Jesus Christ's Second Coming, after the millennium, and after the Great White Throne Judgment.
 
Last edited:

jeffweeder

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2007
1,272
1,065
113
61
South Australia
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Only the Christian overcomers will live in the New Jerusalem. All the former things, all the wicked people, all the evil spirits, all corruptible flesh–all these things are passed away, GONE!

The New Jerusalem (Eternity) is established after Jesus Christ's Second Coming, after the millennium, and after the Great White Throne Judgment.
Just saying After Jesus second coming would have sufficed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rwb

CadyandZoe

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
7,658
2,625
113
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Father calls him God.
The Father commands angels to worship Him.
Both found in Hebrews ch 1.

Done deal.
The Father is the alpha and omega

Jesus is the alpha and omega

We worship Jesus.
Correctly so
I also believe that Jesus is God. So let me explain it differently.

Jesus is God, yes. But how can that be? Trinitarians maintain that Jesus and the Father share the same ontology. I reject this idea. I maintain that Jesus is God because Jesus and the Father share the same identity.

Do you understand the distinction?
 

rebuilder 454

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2023
3,528
886
113
69
robstown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I also believe that Jesus is God. So let me explain it differently.

Jesus is God, yes. But how can that be? Trinitarians maintain that Jesus and the Father share the same ontology. I reject this idea. I maintain that Jesus is God because Jesus and the Father share the same identity.

Do you understand the distinction?
Ontology = Logic,outlook,reason,ideas.?
( I had to look it up)

If that is what you mean, then it is true, however, a non deity could have those qualities, should he be in one mind and unity with God.
By Jesus being God,( equal to the Father, but not the Father), His being is way past a "ontology" with the Father.
If you play it from the " backside", then another picture emerges.
What if He was not God.
What changes.
1) the cross is made null and void.
2) we would not have a kinsman redeemer
3) all the requirements of the OT animal sacrifice ( innocent blood) would not have been necessary..
4) He could not resurrect Himself
5) His blood presented to the Father in Heb 9 could not possibly be accepted.
IOW, WE would need something more to be saved, because a man on the cross, as opposed to a "God Man", could not possibly be perfect, nor could he be a kinsman redeemer.
Put any good man on the cross, and he would be buried and rot.
No power. No spotlessness. No redemption.
To be redeemed, ( us) , is to be purchased, or bought back.
A mere mortal, has no power or standing.
Read Ruth.
Only a kinsman with wealth ( power) could qualify to redeem the property.
Jesus by being God and man is the only God Man that could redeem man kind.

Rev 5
"....and no man was found in heaven or earth to open the seals."
Only a God-man could open them.

It is a mighty, mighty act of God to give His Son.
Jesus= Son.
Son of God.
Same essence and Spirit, and being.

Man makes a statue.
Man BEGETS a son.

Why are so many, many humans trying so hard to make Jesus a "statue" or created being.
Salvation has been presented to us in living color.
Unbelievably vivid and simple.
It, once revealed ( never understood in a million years) ,brings one to their knees, disarms us, and overwhelms us.

Jesus deity and Sonship, is revealed...never understood.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Therefore, it places its appearing, which we have already established coincides with the second coming of the Lord, at the end of the millennium thus revealing a postmillennial appearing of Christ. Christ connects the appearance of the New Jerusalem at His coming, declaring, “Behold, I come quickly.” It is at this all-consummating event that the New Jerusalem comes “down out of heaven from my God.”

Knitting all these passages together reinforces the Amillennial and Postmillennial positions that Revelation 20 is speaking about a current period of time. It is clear Premillennialism has a major problem here. First, John 14:1-3 ties Christ to the heavenly city and presents that city, which is being prepared, as the eternal hope of the saints. If that city does not appear until after the millennium as a Premillennial reading of Revelation 20 would require then the saints will not experience that prepared city for over 1,000 years.

You did not establish the Second Coming at the end of any millennium. This thread is about a pre-trib rapture, which is actually a pre-trib Second Coming.

The absurdity in your position is that you leave out all the Scripture that shows Jesus and the angels are on the earth during the final harvest.

Premil definitely believe and declare the New Jerusalem descends after the Millennium. You have literally no verse that declares the Second Coming is after a declared and pronounced millennium. Revelation 21 does not describe a Second Coming. Revelation 20 does not describe a Second Coming.

In knitting Scripture together, the 6th Seal is the Second Coming described in the explicit Olivet Discourse. In nearly every Second Coming passage the writer declares that Jesus comes with all the angels and the earth is still a place clearly filled with people who are judged while physically alive on the earth and gathered by those angels for that judgment.

You are erroneously equating the New Jerusalem instead of the clear teaching Jesus comes with angels, not a city, but nice try to avoid the actual reality of the situation.

Matthew 13:36-41

"Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field. He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity."

Jesus and His angels are clearly on the earth post a Second Coming. Matthew 25:31-32

"When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats."

Still we see Jesus coming with His angels who will be gathering physically alive people on the earth for judgment.

Matthew 24:29-31

"Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other."

This is in reply to several of your first OP posts and not once have you even defined a period of tribulation, which you are allegedly debunking.

So far you are arguing a strawman 7 year tribulation, you do not even believe in, and deny exists, so you are neither post trib, nor pre-trib, yet you change your own topic and turn it into post Millennial, which was not your point, that you have yet to debunk, ie pre-trib.

Revelation 21 is a thousand years after your undefined tribulation, which was a tribulation because Jesus and the angels were on the earth literally killing people by tossing them directly into the LOF.

The Second Coming is after the tribulation of those days, but brings with the Second Coming a totally different type of tribulation, and that tribulation is what you say Jesus comes after, even though the Second Coming is the instigation of the tribulation you deny, and claim does not exist.

Only a few posters even claim a 7 year period of intense tribulation. Some break it up into a period of Satan's wrath and a period of God's judgment. All get it wrong, because people change and re-arrange Revelation to fit their eschatology they erroneously make up by cherry picking verses and then call that knitting together Scripture in direct contradiction of other avoided Scripture.

The Second Coming is after over or nearly 2,000 years of great tribulation the church has experienced off and on, or depending on where they are born.

That tribulation is described in Matthew 24:4-14

"And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows. Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved."

This is the tribulation of those days. Of course the Second Coming is post this tribulation as it started immediately with the stoning of Stephen, and the disciples thrown into prison, some several times. Instead of making up your own supposed future, why not examine the facts of history, and what Jesus did say will happen?

Even if you take Mark which states:

"But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken. And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven."

You cannot escape defining tribulation from the first century as opposed to when the stars fall. Revelation 6 states that happens at the 6th Seal way before the first Trumpet even sounds. Also the stars fall in conjunction with 2 Peter 3 at the Second Coming, not at the end of existence.

"And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood; And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind. And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places. And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;"

Clearly billions are still on the earth hiding, and the angels will be gathering them for judgment as Jesus Himself will be physically on the earth sitting in Judgment over the living gathered from all over the earth. That does not negate a pre-trib rapture, as the church is gathered first and glorified as a sign to all those on the earth, they are about to be judged, and that is time of intense tribulation. The literal judgment of those alive who are awarded their final state of being, either eternal life or the second death in the LOF. And the Millennium has not even started yet, since you went off topic and threw that point in instead of even defining a tribulation, you are arguing over as if there is not even a post tribulation position either, which is even more absurd arguing for something you don't even believe in.
 

CadyandZoe

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
7,658
2,625
113
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ontology = Logic,outlook,reason,ideas.?
( I had to look it up)
Ontology is the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. For further study, look up the Greek term "ousia" in the encyclopedia and sus out the meanings of words like "essentia" and "substantia."

The Trinitarian Doctrine asserts that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit share the same "ousia." This concept is based on Aristotle's differentiation between "substance" (the essence of a thing) and "accidents" (the appearance of a thing). For example, according to the doctrine of "Transubstantiation," while the essence of the Eucharist is the body of Christ, the physical appearance of the bread remains unchanged. Following this logic, the Trinity is an "ousia" referred to as "The Godhead." Even though Jesus appears as a man, his essence is the divine essence, or θεία ουσία.

Nothing like this is found in the Bible as such. Defenders of the Trinity Doctrine will point to verses that seem to suggest this concept, but they are being forced into the doctrine, rather than derived from the Bible in my opinion. But don't believe me.

For further research, one might investigate the concept of the "hypostatic union", which seeks to explain how Jesus can have two natures.

The hypostatic union refers to the profound theological concept that combines Christ's humanity and divinity into one individual person. In metaphysical terms, it asserts that Jesus Christ possesses both a fully human nature and an undiminished divine nature simultaneously. This union is foundational to Christian theology and emphasizes the unique theanthropic person of Jesus, who is both God and sinless human. For a more detailed exploration, you might find Michael Gorman's work on Aquinas's metaphysics of the hypostatic union insightful.

This is how I started: I researched as much information as I could find on the theological basis of the Trinity Doctrine. So, I have directed you to investigate the concepts yourself. I don't affirm the Trinity Doctrine as formulated by the Early Church Fathers, but it's only fair that I point you in the right direction so that you can understand this Christian theological position and make up your own mind.

I have agreed to refrain from debating the issue here in this thread. My purpose here is to highlight the basic concept and point you toward an area of study that might help you learn more about the Christian, theological doctrine of the Trinity.

I want to comment further on some of your other points, but I promised not to debate the subject. But if I may, I would like to respond to your final comment.

Jesus deity and Sonship, is revealed...never understood.
I was told this many times as I studied the subject. I think I heard the Bible answer man, on the radio, say that the Trinity Doctrine can be apprehended but not comprehended. Other folks suggested that it was a "mystery." But as I read and studied Christian theologians and Early Church Fathers, each of them wrote and explicated the subject as if they DID understand it. And I wanted to know the subject the way they knew it.

I couldn't help but suspend my disbelief at the notion that a doctrine fundamental to our faith would be incomprehensible to anyone without a doctor of philosophy and a doctor of theology degree. The Gospel is so straightforward and easy to understand that even a child can grasp it. However, the doctrine of the Trinity is so incomprehensible that 99% of churchgoers haven't a clue what it means.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
John 14:1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.
Notice that at the time Jesus spoke even before His death burial and resurrection there were already mansions in heaven?

Jesus went away to prepare something. How about Jesus went away to create the heavens and earth in Genesis 1:1? Since they already had Genesis. That is the answer in the next verse.

"And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know."

They knew the way He was about to prepare after leaving earth: Genesis 1. That had already been established when Moses wrote about what God prepared.

Genesis 2 was the preparation of the Garden called Paradise. That already existed. A city already existed that Abraham was looking for. Paradise was the country desired by those in the OT. All that had already existed because your verses you quoted stated they already existed, even though Jesus had not even left yet.

Talk about a post task. Jesus physically left earth to prepare the past that started it all. Those verses prove Jesus went to prepare what was already in existence, before He even left.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Where does Scripture teach “the New Jerusalem” is “created after the Great White Throne Judgment"?

Because your time frame is messed up, you fail to see the timing and application of multiple passges. All the time, you do not have one single proof-text to bring to the table nothing to prove Pretrib.

Please address the many passages above that forbid Pretrib, if you can.
Do you think then that the NHNE started in Genesis 1, and Revelation 21 is actually Genesis 1, and we will just be in an eternal time loop?

How could Jesus go away and then prepare the next creation immediately upon going away?

That is a messed up time frame. Jesus is the alpha and omega, even before the Cross. Jesus said before Abraham, I am.

Has Jesus then done nothing after leaving, even though He said He would go to prepare a place? You all think He went away to prepare the next creation, but do not even consider He went away to prepare the creation that currently exists. Some of you think the next creation is not viable either, because you apply the next creation, as merely spiritual defining current conditions on earth. You literally do not even have another creation, but somehow we are now as God existing in eternity outside of any creation.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
We meet Him in the air and return with Him to a regenerated and perfected earth.
According to what? The church does not descend until after the Millennium.

You have to have the church taken away first. The Millennium is not over in a twinkling of an eye.

You have yet to prove a Second Coming after the millennium or post Millennial. You have not even proven the church leaves after intense tribulation. You only assume you will still be here on earth with Jesus and the angels as one gathered after the Second Coming.

Matthew 13 and Matthew 25 state the angels are on earth gathering the final harvest, not waiting to gather souls out of dead bodies, as they currently do. That soul has to get to either Paradise or sheol somehow. Why do you think the soul can figure out on it's own how to get to either place? The angels are constantly gathering souls. After the Second Coming, they will be gathering physically alive humans, not just souls.
 

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
8,527
4,177
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
As I indicated to him, "these things" referenced in Luke 21:31 are not the same as "these things" referenced in Luke 21:36, but he is not understanding that.

Luke 21:25 And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; 26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. 27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. 29 And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree, and all the trees; 30 When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand. 31 So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand.

So, when Jesus said "when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand", He was talking about the things He had just previously mentioned like "signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth".

Whatever those signs are and whatever that "distress of nations" on the earth is exactly, Jesus said believers would see those things and would then know that His coming and the kingdom of God was at hand. He didn't say they would know His coming would then only be a few years away or anything like that. He said "at hand". That means when those things come to pass, He is bringing the kingdom of God on that day. So, "these things" cannot be the things that Jesus said to pray that we would be worthy to escape because He said we would see "these things" come to pass first before He comes. And, when we do see those things come to pass, we will know His coming and the kingdom of God are at hand. To pray to escape these things that He said believers would see come to pass obviously makes no sense.

So, that leads to the question of what then were "these things" that Jesus said we should pray to escape?

Luke 21:32 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled. 33 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. 34 And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares. 35 For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth. 36 Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.

So, again, it's not "these things" that Jesus said we would see come to pass that we should pray to escape because that would be contradictory. Instead, it's heaven and earth passing away that we should pray to escape. That will catch unbelievers completely off guard just as Peter indicated in 2 Peter 3:10-12. Jesus will be coming like a thief in the night and no one knows the day or hour, but we can be ready for it so that we escape His wrath which "as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth". We should pray that we are instead caught up to meet the Lord in the air when He comes in order to escape the "sudden destruction" from which His enemies "shall not escape" (1 Thess 5:2-3).

I know that you already know all of this, but I just wanted to share with you a way that we can explain "these things" that believers will see come to pass in contrast with "these things" that we should pray to be worthy to escape.
Agreed. I am on the road. Cannot reply in detail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiritual Israelite

rebuilder 454

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2023
3,528
886
113
69
robstown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ontology is the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. For further study, look up the Greek term "ousia" in the encyclopedia and sus out the meanings of words like "essentia" and "substantia."

The Trinitarian Doctrine asserts that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit share the same "ousia." This concept is based on Aristotle's differentiation between "substance" (the essence of a thing) and "accidents" (the appearance of a thing). For example, according to the doctrine of "Transubstantiation," while the essence of the Eucharist is the body of Christ, the physical appearance of the bread remains unchanged. Following this logic, the Trinity is an "ousia" referred to as "The Godhead." Even though Jesus appears as a man, his essence is the divine essence, or θεία ουσία.

Nothing like this is found in the Bible as such. Defenders of the Trinity Doctrine will point to verses that seem to suggest this concept, but they are being forced into the doctrine, rather than derived from the Bible in my opinion. But don't believe me.

For further research, one might investigate the concept of the "hypostatic union", which seeks to explain how Jesus can have two natures.

The hypostatic union refers to the profound theological concept that combines Christ's humanity and divinity into one individual person. In metaphysical terms, it asserts that Jesus Christ possesses both a fully human nature and an undiminished divine nature simultaneously. This union is foundational to Christian theology and emphasizes the unique theanthropic person of Jesus, who is both God and sinless human. For a more detailed exploration, you might find Michael Gorman's work on Aquinas's metaphysics of the hypostatic union insightful.

This is how I started: I researched as much information as I could find on the theological basis of the Trinity Doctrine. So, I have directed you to investigate the concepts yourself. I don't affirm the Trinity Doctrine as formulated by the Early Church Fathers, but it's only fair that I point you in the right direction so that you can understand this Christian theological position and make up your own mind.

I have agreed to refrain from debating the issue here in this thread. My purpose here is to highlight the basic concept and point you toward an area of study that might help you learn more about the Christian, theological doctrine of the Trinity.

I want to comment further on some of your other points, but I promised not to debate the subject. But if I may, I would like to respond to your final comment.


I was told this many times as I studied the subject. I think I heard the Bible answer man, on the radio, say that the Trinity Doctrine can be apprehended but not comprehended. Other folks suggested that it was a "mystery." But as I read and studied Christian theologians and Early Church Fathers, each of them wrote and explicated the subject as if they DID understand it. And I wanted to know the subject the way they knew it.

I couldn't help but suspend my disbelief at the notion that a doctrine fundamental to our faith would be incomprehensible to anyone without a doctor of philosophy and a doctor of theology degree. The Gospel is so straightforward and easy to understand that even a child can grasp it. However, the doctrine of the Trinity is so incomprehensible that 99% of churchgoers haven't a clue what it means.

You are demonstrating why theologians can not unpack the deity of Jesus..
You also demonstrate that rejecting that deity, YOU MUST MODIFY THE BIBLE.
That is what you are demonstrating


It is somewhat understood.
Suppose a man let's his son die in place of a mass murderer.( As illustrated in the trinity) You will never process that in a
Psychological rabbit trail, because love does "foolish" things.
Imagine a God that puts his Son through torture and death, for criminals and heathens that hate Him.
It is called irrational.
It is not common sense.
God is not in anyone's psychological box.
That is an insult to the author of the Bible, to put him in a human box of misunderstanding.
It reminds me of those pointing to Noah and mocking his lack of knowledge and "understanding". Ok trust your understanding. They will definately "understand" eventually...kinda like those denying Jesus.
The bible stands in truth.
Not human understanding.
Faith is not faith in the parameters of the psyche.
Heb 11 is full of people that were not in your common sense realm.

The deity of Jesus debate is based off of several verses.( the foundation of Jesus deiety)
Those opposing it, actually shy from the very foundation of the debate.
Using your logic , I would be inclined to reject the detractors, not the ones that have their Bibles opened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.