Good point! I could leave the town to evangelize. There is a town that I've heard of that is mostly Christians.Sounds lovely but who would you evangelize? ;)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Good point! I could leave the town to evangelize. There is a town that I've heard of that is mostly Christians.Sounds lovely but who would you evangelize? ;)
I looked it up:It's not in the Bible. It is yet another invention of men.
The way our country has been so loose with immigration and importing doctors on H1b visas it wouldn't take much imagination to see a complete takeover from within. I read an article about a Mexican immigrant who got elected to office and then made the town a sanctuary city - endangering all the people who lived in the town, to benefit his race. I see why he did it, and maybe some of us would have done it if the situation was reversed, but it didn't help any of the people who lived in the city when a lot of illegals flocked there.I don't know. But it was a loaded military that overthrew the Shah of Iran. And the main reason the WWI and WWII allies kept the military draft was to prevent insurgents from forming sizable groups. (Jean Lasserre "War and the Gospel").
You have a point. But if Christians don't assume office then we'll be ruled by evil men. Look at what happened when Hitler assumed office. An evil man then ruled over everyone. I know most of the Jews don't believe in Christ but what about the Christians who had to function under someone so evil? That's what is going to happen in America as more and more godless rulers assume office. Look at how our tax dollars are being used to rape and pillage other countries and promote abortion and other evils. I just can't believe that God wants us to sit back and do nothing.No. A true disciple of Christ does not entangle himself with the affairs of this world. We have a different citizenship and a different ambassadorship.
One can't get involved in politics without getting involved with the devil.
You have a point. But if Christians don't assume office then we'll be ruled by evil men
Look at what happened when Hitler assumed office. An evil man then ruled over everyone.
I know most of the Jews don't believe in Christ but what about the Christians who had to function under someone so evil? That's what is going to happen in America as more and more godless rulers assume office. Look at how our tax dollars are being used to rape and pillage other countries and promote abortion and other evils. I just can't believe that God wants us to sit back and do nothing.
Dispensationalism is not a *theory* as stated in your quotation. It is simply a method for properly understanding the Bible. Not just prophecies, but all Scripture, unless there is good reason to see a metaphor of figure of speech. For example Jesus said "I am the Bread of Life". That must be taken in its spiritual sense.Dispensationalism favors a very literal interpretation of Bible prophecies...
Don't assume that all non-Christians are evil. Many people who seek office do so with altruistic designs....although they have the mixture of wanting the power that goes with the devil's domain.
A Christian is supposed to be wiser than that. Jesus resisted the temptation to take the short-cut of having all political power....offered by the one who bestows political power...Satan.
This fact is what brings into being the temptation to take matters into our own hands rather than looking to God.
Not do nothing...pray and be a witness to the truth. This world is NOT the kingdom of God. We, as Christians, are to do our part. But that part is not to use evil means to correct an evil. We are to overcome evil a different way....by doing good as GOD sends us.
It is a trap to get involved WITH the world without keeping our prophetic distance from it. We are NOT to be OF this world. Yet we are sent into the world to LOVE. It is just that we can't take the shortcut of letting the situation be defined by those who are blind to the truth. We need to show the world another way. Not the way of power....but the way of love.
This is not true. It did not originate in scripture. It is a theory based on "what if" we place a gap between Daniel's 69th and 70th weeks? And then speculation on how the passage might read. It is false prophecy from start to finish with not a single scripture to support any of its claims.Dispensationalism is not a *theory* as stated in your quotation. It is simply a method for properly understanding the Bible. Not just prophecies, but all Scripture, unless there is good reason to see a metaphor of figure of speech. For example Jesus said "I am the Bread of Life". That must be taken in its spiritual sense.
I didn't write that quote, I took it from a Christian site: https://www.christianbiblereference.org/faq_rapture.htmDispensationalism is not a *theory* as stated in your quotation. It is simply a method for properly understanding the Bible. Not just prophecies, but all Scripture, unless there is good reason to see a metaphor of figure of speech. For example Jesus said "I am the Bread of Life". That must be taken in its spiritual sense.
Exactly; that's a good analogy. I recall watching a western about a Christian sect that interpreted the bible that Christians are never to show any aggression. They stood back while terrible things were done to their families. It was fiction, and I don't know if any religious sects really interpret the bible to mean never defending yourself and your loved ones, but the show was an illustration of how dangerous that type of thinking is."Don't feed starving people and protect abused children... just pray for them." Hope utterly stupid.
Christians never used violence to defend themselves in the NT. Jesus rebuked Peter for cutting off Malchus' ear with his sword.Exactly; that's a good analogy. I recall watching a western about a Christian sect that interpreted the bible that Christians are never to show any aggression. They stood back while terrible things were done to their families. It was fiction, and I don't know if any religious sects really interpret the bible to mean never defending yourself and your loved ones, but the show was an illustration of how dangerous that type of thinking is.
And that's your theory, since Amillennialism and Preterism are false. There is no "what if" since Christ Himself placed a gap between the time of His ascension and the restoration of the kingdom of Israel (which you don't even believe), and this ties in with Daniel's prophecy of 70 weeks.This is not true. It did not originate in scripture. It is a theory based on "what if" we place a gap between Daniel's 69th and 70th weeks? And then speculation on how the passage might read. It is false prophecy from start to finish with not a single scripture to support any of its claims.
I'm just afraid that too many believers take that stance of long-suffering and they never try to work to improve things. I can't believe that's what God wants us to do. There is a married official in our city who tried to get a female family member to get together with him. My husband flew to his office and blew up. He left the female family member alone after that. I don't think God expected my husband to sit back quietly and do nothing; fold his hands in prayer and say "God will take care of it." That's what scares me about Christians. Of course we didn't push to have him fired so we didn't take all action that was open to us. But I'm afraid that too many Christians are passive.
That's just one small illustration but I think God wants us to be proactive. I'm afraid of Christians who won't take action. A friend is like that. I've sent her things by email to contact legislators about and she just dismisses it. She won't email legislators, just goes about her business, goes to church, goes on vacations. I don't think that's what God wants. I also don't know of any Scripture that encourages passivity.
"Don't feed starving people and protect abused children... just pray for them." Hope utterly stupid.
Exactly; that's a good analogy. I recall watching a western about a Christian sect that interpreted the bible that Christians are never to show any aggression. They stood back while terrible things were done to their families. It was fiction, and I don't know if any religious sects really interpret the bible to mean never defending yourself and your loved ones, but the show was an illustration of how dangerous that type of thinking is.
You cannot provide one scripture directly supporting any of your Dispensationalist claims. Not one. This makes you a false prophet along with them.And that's your theory, since Amillennialism and Preterism are false. There is no "what if" since Christ Himself placed a gap between the time of His ascension and the restoration of the kingdom of Israel (which you don't even believe), and this ties in with Daniel's prophecy of 70 weeks.
Now notice carefully what is recorded in Acts 1:
6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.
8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
The apostles who were totally familiar with all the OT prophecies regarding the restoration of Israel asked Christ a legitimate question. They were not aware of the Church Age. And had Christ immediately restored the kingdom to Israel, Daniel's prophecy would have been fulfilled at that time. But Jesus indirectly introduced a gap but giving them the Great Commission, and avoiding the issue of when Israel would be redeemed and restored.
Good point! I could leave the town to evangelize. There is a town that I've heard of that is mostly Christians.