Lambano
Well-Known Member
And the foolishness thereof.wow…you always seem to have the exuberance of youth to me…
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And the foolishness thereof.wow…you always seem to have the exuberance of youth to me…
insistence’s
And the foolishness thereof.![]()
But I can’t promise Barny won’t come in and pants you. He lurks a lot and then suddenly you find yourself pantsed.
20 To the Jews I became as a Jew, so that I might gain Jews; to those who are under the Law, I became as one under the Law, though not being under the Law myself, so that I might gain those who are under the Law; 21 to those who are without the Law, I became as one without the Law, though not being without the law of God but under the law of Christ, so that I might gain those who are without the Law. 22 To the weak I became weak, that I might gain the weak; I have become all things to all people, so that I may by all means save some. (1 Corinthians 9:20-22)
I have a particular reason for quoting that passage, but for now I'll keep it to myself. :)
Won't happen, I can promise you that.
J.
Personalities of preachers aside (since the truth is true even when evil people say it):Well I only got to his rebuttal of TUand L and couldn't take it anymore.
I would love to meet this preacher in his church and debate him of the Biblicalness of the five points of Calvinism.
He either used a book that limits what they choose to saying the points or is lying!
The five points are extraordinarily biblical. But some of the commentators who speak of them have stirred controversy. Like the L for limited atonement. Hyper Calvinists believe Jesus died only for the elect, but that is not te4h standard teaching of limited atonement.
This man uses different authors writing on controversial opinions that are not the mainstream belief of those who see the five points as what Scripture teaches.
there is a book by Packer and Sproul ( i strongly disagree with their reformed theology BTW) that isan excellent biblical treatise discussing the five points.
Teh is preacher makes his own conclusions such as " If you can't make a right choice, you can't make a wrong choice either"! that is pure human philosophy!
My biggest animosity towards him is his lying! He says He has no animosity towards anyone, but started his message by saying anyone who believes in Calvinism has departed from the faith and is listening to doctrines of demons! IOW unsaved folks! Seems ti me he is saying trusting in the death and resurrection of Jesus AND not believing in any of the five points of Calvinsim is required to be saved! Other wise you have fallen from the faith!
I really would love to sit across this man and debate him in front of as many as could be seated and on TV and internet! He needs to chopped down a whole lot of pegs.
He is a five point Armeniast (that is why the Calvinists made their answer five points) which means he accepts the Catholic doctrine on these points!
trust: i absolutely trust God as judge to be fair and just. And thats why He’s so scary. He’s perfect, im not.
Hope: i hope to not goto hell.
Love: yea, i got nothing.
Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in thee.@Lifelong_sinner
I never was a Calvinist.
Two years ago I was introduced to Calvinism by a very close friend of mine and since then no peace and no assurance re my salvation.
There is a member who fight, tooth and nail against this hideous, insipid teaching and I admire him.
J.
Great, and no scriptures to prove your point.
I am going to do a search on every member using scriptures and those that don't. Should be interesting.
J.
I suppose that’s the beginning of wisdom.trust: i absolutely trust God as judge to be fair and just. And thats why He’s so scary.
Sadly Five Point Calvinism is actually an attack on the true Gospel. You should abandon it altogether, and go back to the Bible. While the Reformers had a golden opportunity to scrap all man-made ideas, they failed to scrap Five Point Calvinism.
Great, and no scriptures to prove your point.
I am going to do a search on every member using scriptures and those that don't. Should be interesting.
J.
Personalities of preachers aside (since the truth is true even when evil people say it):
Arminianism is a slightly flawed human distillation of soteriology.
But 5-point Calvinism in it's modern interpretation is a theological train wreck. The devotion given to fanatical loyalty to it requires a cognitive dissonance that denies the obvious presence of premeditated tyranny and monstrous malice on the part of what the Scriptures endlessly portray as a loving God with a perfect balance of the attributes of justice and mercy, most succinctly and essentially displayed at Calvary. The Lamb of God taketh away the sin of the world. Without Christ and Him crucified, it would be impossible to justly dispatch even the sin of the finally impenitent.
The controversy over limited atonement would vanish if people would just stop trying to figure out how God can foreknow without predetermining (IOW, how He thinks). He does it because He can. He can swing it. He's got the omnipotent chops. (Hmm, how else could I put it?)
When the topic arises in the Bible, it's virtually always about God's sovereignty over the nations and their leaders—not individual struggling souls.
Have you ever seen a debate that solved anything?
Believing we are predestinated souls specifically for salvation, is the strong delusion that leads to continuing in sins and trespasses: if we believe we are specifically predetermined for salvation, then we believe we are saved according to the fates of paganism, whereby we must be, will be, and shall always be saved, no more what we we do or not.
It is the rotten core of OSAS: unconditional salvation once for all, based upon being specifically chosen for salvation by God, which cannot be annulled by any man, including his ongoing sins and trespasses.
But let me know if you wish me to show you th ebiblical reasons of the 5 points, that were given as 5 points to refute teh 5 points of Armeniasm, which is just a revision of Catholic false doctrine.
I would be interested in how you are going to do this, as I consider it to be impossible. How will you know which answers are truthful?
you should take this as a challenge!