Agreed. Like Psalm 110:1, Jesus is my lord but not the LORD.You said, "Jesus is my savior but not the Savior."
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Agreed. Like Psalm 110:1, Jesus is my lord but not the LORD.You said, "Jesus is my savior but not the Savior."
it doesn’t say that and you know it. OF God is not is God.You left out the part where it says the Son is God.
It certainly does say the Son is God! How many times must I quote it?it doesn’t say that and you know it. OF God is not is God.
You accused me of "slander". You denied saying "Jesus is my savior but not the Savior." I quoted you saying "Jesus is my savior but not the Savior." You owe me an apology.Again with this slander? What post did I say that?
No. Of us not is. How many times do I have to say that?It certainly does say the Son is God!
Again, you did not identify the post in which I said what you claim. Slander.You accused me of "slander". You denied saying "Jesus is my savior but not the Savior." I quoted you saying "Jesus is my savior but not the Savior." You owe me an apology.
No Scripture?No. Of us not is. How many times do I have to say that?
I certainly did!Again, you did not identify the post in which I said what you claim. Slander.
From the Jewish Tanakh….Agreed. Like Psalm 110:1, Jesus is my lord but not the LORD.
I believe starting a thread that in the OP calls out any members of a denomination and their faith doctrine is fully intended to cause conflict. To divide the community and lead those targeted to feel insecure in their faith and unwelcome in our community.There is a thread called "Question for JW's' that has turned into a relentless attack. There are many such threads where some in this community feel it appropriate to gang up on a particular denomination. (SDA's and others are also targets). My questions are:
- What kind of witness do you suppose this is to outsiders who observe such vicious infighting?
- Do you suppose Jesus would judge such relentless attacks as loving, as action becoming of his worthy disciples?
- Is this why Jesus suffered and died on the cross; so there can be eternal acrimony over doctrine?
Seems to me these "question" threads are just attacks in the form of a question. It pains me to see them.
“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”
John 13:34-35
Now this is an interesting point…..because if the apostasy that Jesus foretold was beginning in the first century, then what emerged from the second century when there were no apostles left alive to restrain that apostate movement….where do you imagine that the “Christianity” you have been led to accept as genuine, came from? From that apostasy came the Roman Catholic church…..the mother of the harlots whom Jesus will bring to an account.False doctrines are to be reproved & exposed and the individuals that promote such are to be marked as not among the brethren, and avoided. If ppl give these the attention they crave, they increase in their promotions.
Romans 16:17-18
17 Now I beseech you, brethren, MARK them which cause divisions and offences CONTRARY to the doctrine which ye have learned; and AVOID them.
Jesus preached his message to all who would listen. The religious leaders did not have a good word to say about him, even accusing him of getting his power from the devil, because they could not deny that his works were powerful. He exposed the Pharisees for the hypocrites that they were, but never did he turn away a genuine truth seeker.18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
Debating, discussing, exposing and reproving such is not a personal attack. Saying someone is ignorant, foolish, heretical, a liar or such directed at that person is.
And that is quite correct, provided that the scriptures are not interpreted incorrectly. There are also translation issues and biases that creep in when it suits someone to bring in a belief that is not supported by the rest of scripture. If we find scripture contradicting other scripture, then there is a problem if it was all inspired by the same spirit.Denominations and their doctrines are too many to count in a discourse for debate. What should be reasoned is the foundation of salvation and the truths used to build our walk upon.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJV
ALL SCRIPTURE is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
The only thing that removes error is truth. Theology is the study of religious doctrine, not necessarily scripture. You will find those with expertise in theology are too often totally ignorant of the Bible in other important areas, outside of the doctrines that are taught. Only thorough Bible study can dispel the errors that Christendom has been promoting for centuries.1Timothy 1:
.......that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine, [4] Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.
Once these are acknowledged, the only way to remove their theology is to stop feeing into their posts.
A prerequisite to understanding Scripture is basic reading comprehension and word meanings. Feel free to consult your favorite lexicon and learn the difference between prepositions (o', OF, FROM) with verbs (is, am, etc). But there certainly is Scripture on point, which you violate with every post, presuming there is an eisegesis code or riddle to read into the text.No Scripture?
Oh, OK. I only saw the previous post. In the future Jack, I'd appreciate you not misquoting me. In the post in question I acknowledged Jesus is my savior. It is in this context that I wrote that he is just not the savior, who is our God, the Father.I certainly did!
You said: "Jesus is my savior but not the Savior."
In our image..
Did you even read Hosea? I'll ask you again, Does your Bible explicitly identify Jesus as the servant of God or not?www.christianityboard.com
Post 114
AJ, I no longer believe the problem is rooted in simple ignorance but deliberate dishonesty.Those who think “Lord” is another word for “God” know little about scripture or Jewish culture.
Ho Hum, another smokescreen to avoid the Scripture. Just like a dedicated JW!A prerequisite to understanding Scripture is basic reading comprehension and word meanings. Feel free to consult your favorite lexicon and learn the difference between prepositions (o', OF, FROM) with verbs (is, am, etc). But there certainly is Scripture on point, which you violate with every post, presuming there is an eisegesis code or riddle to read into the text.
2 Cor 1:13 (VOICE) We are not writing to you in anything resembling codes or riddles
Yes, you are attacking fruitful denominations of Christians.Ephesians chapter 5:11. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.
Im not attacking anyone. I'm exposing the fruits of darkness.
Misquoting you? You're covering your SLANDER accusation against me with another lie! I'll quote you again for everyone to witness:Oh, OK. I only saw the previous post. In the future Jack, I'd appreciate you not misquoting me. In the post in question I acknowledged Jesus is my savior. It is in this context that I wrote that he is just not the savior, who is our God, the Father.
In post 114, I asked if your Bible says Jesus is a servant of God. No answer huh?
Fruitful? JW's? They twist nearly every verse in the Bible to change what God said! Just like Satan would do.Yes, you are attacking fruitful denominations of Christians.