Oh Yeah, my name was well known in RCC school - stay away from that David!
I was west coast. We never did anything to deserve a beating :-)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Oh Yeah, my name was well known in RCC school - stay away from that David!
I was west coast. We never did anything to deserve a beating :)
And now, we can truly Laugh out loud, without shame or fear.
When the Lord brought back the captivity of Zion,
We were like those who dream.
Then our mouth was filled with laughter,
And our tongue with singing.
Then they said among the nations,
“The Lord has done great things for them.”
The Lord has done great things for us,
And we are glad.
Yes sir - I say we can either laugh or cry. What are you going to do it is the way it was. I was just in your part of the woods - the food oh man unbelievable. I'm a bread man and the breads are the best I found in this country. You familiar with Amaroso rolls wow.
Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, - Romans 16:25 .
Underline 'my gospel.' My gospel - is the most important words in your Bible. 'My gospel' - written 3 times in scripture. We need to take a serious look at that, and follow through on it's instructions. When Paul instructs believers to follow him, what did he mean by that?
You follow Paul through his Epistle's.
He wrote 14 books of the bible, and they are all written directly to you. It is "the gospel of grace written to the born again." Why would the born again need a gospel? Because they never existed before in the world - and they never had a gospel. It is that simple - we needed our own message to go with the cross and the new birth.
No gospel ever had the law in it. The Law was not good news, it was bad news, It cursed everyone who did not confirm and obey every letter. Only Christ met that standard. So by the law came a curse. that's not good news. that is bad newsYou didn't know you had your own message but you do. He is very protective of his gospel. He gives many warning about his gospel not being like other gospels - It has no law in it. Paul moved in fear and trembling because of his gospel. He guarded his gospel from his own background, always afraid he would mix law with the grace he was receiving by revelation. That was Paul's fear and trembling. Paul was above many of his peers when it came to understanding Jewish law and traditions. Very educated man, but that understanding was giving way to the new understanding of Christ in you.
Paul did not teach a different gospel. He taught the same gospel. He who believes is not condemned, he who does not believe is condemned already. Whoever believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. Christ fulfilled the law. as he kept it from birth with no sin, Died as the high priest and lamb of God and was resurrected.Paul spent a few years in the desert (getting out of his mind alot of his law understanding, IMO), we don't know why but I speculate - the Lord was working on Paul to get a lot of his old understanding out of him so he could understand this new message of grace.
Why would Paul use the kind of language he uses such as; my gospel? He separated his gospel from anything else anyone would say. He would put his gospel up against any message that would try to displace his gospel of grace - knowing the law would separate believers (in mind - not knowing who they are) and not establish them in Christ. It was the gospel that was given to him to give to us - this new race of people to be born (birthed by God the father) into existence that never existed before! The born again believer! ..scripture calls them.
He wanted us to know he had the message to the born again. Look at some of the problems he with some of the other Apostles. We have to confront religious ideas about scripture - the idea we get that everybody gets along and it's all ok. It was not ok, they had many run ins, and it was all over the gospel. You will have to confront that if you follow Paul. All they knew was law and Paul came with this new message of grace and it didn't fit what other's believed. That was a problem for Paul and he would confront those with his gospel. He had to because God was bringing in the message for the new creation people that had started on the day of Pentecost.
A new people with a new gospel, and Christianity was born! Follow Paul, as he followed the Lord in getting the new revelation gospel revealed.
Can you explain this. The born again need a gospel? The gospel is needed to be born again.
No gospel ever had the law in it. The Law was not good news, it was bad news, It cursed everyone who did not confirm and obey every letter. Only Christ met that standard. So by the law came a curse. that's not good news. that is bad news
Paul did not teach a different gospel. He taught the same gospel. He who believes is not condemned, he who does not believe is condemned already. Whoever believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. Christ fulfilled the law. as he kept it from birth with no sin, Died as the high priest and lamb of God and was resurrected.
Peter taught the same gospel As did James and John
Peter taught the same gospel As did James and John
but contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; - Galatians 2:7.
You think this verse is saying that there are two different gospels? One for the Jew and one for the Gentile?
to thebut contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; - Galatians 2:7.
ALWAYS BAD NEWS if an angel appears without any words of comfort
I have been doing that for decades.Just my understanding. Look at scripture without Pauls 14 epistles. First see if you can find the in Christ message. Before Paul came preaching Christ as he did. See what you find!
I do not see Paul ever told peter to teach circumcision as part of the gospel. Where do you find this?No, I don't think Peter knew any better at the time. Paul concluded - if you feel God called you to preach circumcision then you should go preach circumcision. As for me (Paul) God called me to preach uncircumcision. Peter came to a better understanding of the cross. We can base that on his Epistles, and what he said on Pentecost. Two different messages come out of him. Peter talks about new birth and the seed in his epistles, and so on. But it wasn't until Paul was preaching. He never really took Paul like Paul was to be taken and he says Paul was a hard man to take. Nothing bad on Peter, he grew like any one else. It is there to read.. written. I say things from some of my study through the years.. conversation.. good fellowship with those that I feel had a good understanding.
I have been doing that for decades.
they teach the same gospel.
What do you think Jesus taught that Paul did not?
Yes, as also he gave the rest of the apostles.You honestly cannot see a difference? Jesus gave paul the gospel he preached.
So did my wife..not putting it down just kidding around. Hey it wasn't for our past we probably wouldn't even know anything about a God. I say alot about religion but it has it's place in the world.
So did my wife..not putting it down just kidding around. Hey it wasn't for our past we probably wouldn't even know anything about a God. I say alot about religion but it has it's place in the world.
No, I don't think Peter knew any better at the time. Paul concluded - if you feel God called you to preach circumcision then you should go preach circumcision. As for me (Paul) God called me to preach uncircumcision. Peter came to a better understanding of the cross. We can base that on his Epistles, and what he said on Pentecost. Two different messages come out of him. Peter talks about new birth and the seed in his epistles, and so on. But it wasn't until Paul was preaching. He never really took Paul like Paul was to be taken and he says Paul was a hard man to take. Nothing bad on Peter, he grew like any one else. It is there to read.. written. I say things from some of my study through the years.. conversation.. good fellowship with those that I feel had a good understanding.