Neither. I'm studying this concept out. Do you know how many verses there are in the Bible?
31,102
Now that you posted that number, it seems quite small, considering that there are 365 days in a year, and there are 66 books - some shorter than others, which means that in 365 days we can read the entire Bible through, by reading 2 or 3 chapters a day.
So we can actually read the Bible from cover to cover, every year, and if we have been baptized say for a decade, we would have read the Bible through 10 times, if we kept up that routine.
The more we read the Bible, the more familiar we are with what verses say, and who said what.
Teaching others also adds to how often we use verses, making them more familiar.
I don't think you can show an example of millions of people being resurrected over a long period of time from Scripture.
John 5:28 tells of a resurrection of
all those in their tombs.
This resurrection occurs,
during the judgment day of 1,000 years, according to Revelation 20
You're welcome to give your best guess explanation as to how that worked for Elijah & Enoch. It will likely come out being much like I've already surmised. I didn't claim to be omniscient.
Romans 3:23-26 explains that before Christ came, God was forgiving sins in the past, based on the ransom sacrifice of Jesus Christ, which was as good as paid, before the actual sacrifice.
This goes much quicker if you first claim how I'm disagreeing with them.
You said...
We do not get the chance to go to heaven after we are resurrected. Our one and only chance to be saved is in this physical life.
According to the scriptures...
John 14:1-4 Jesus promised his disciples that he would take them home to be with him, in his fathers house, where the would abide with him.
2 Corinthians 5:1 Paul speaks of having a body to live eternally in heaven.
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 Paul speaks of those who would rise to meet the lord, and be with him always.
1 Peter 1:3-4 Peter speaks of an inheritance, incorruptible and undefiled and that does not fade away, reserved in heaven for them.
These scriptures do not agree with your comment.
It's clear you don't understand what this thread is about, or how it works. This is called a discussion; a Bible Study. It's not necessary to approach this like an attack on me as if I'm preaching false doctrine. I made my position crystal clear in the OP that I am in the process of studying this possibility out and am here to discuss the ins and outs of it.
That is all.
I believe I understand what this OP is about.
What I don't understand, is how I have "approach this like an attack on you as if you are preaching false doctrine"
Having said that, the people you listed were saved by believing in God. They were all God-fearing and righteous. That means they committed themselves to the Lord and they obeyed the Commandments. You do know Jesus is God, right?
What I am trying to understand is how they were saved, when the blood of Jesus Christ is what saves sinful mankind, who puts faith in him.
I provided the scripture above though, so that's okay.
I read those verses, and they do not say the evildoer was a God-fearing man.
The evildoer basically asked for forgiveness, like many people who followed Christ, but the evildoer did not follow Christ, like those who really stuck with him - Luke 22:28-30. He did not follow Christ continually - Matthew 10:38, and obey his commands John 14:15; Matthew 28:19-20.
I've already stated many times that Just and Unjust can refer to Christians. You are developing a disrespectful, argumentative, attitude that is not conducive to an honest and intelligent discussion.
By posting a scripture, as you have done?
If I don't like how somebody conducts themselves here, I don't waste my time with them. Too many frauds on these boards to waste time with - while there are few honest seekers who actually want to learn and discuss Scripture.
How am I conducting myself, different to you?
Gen2rev said:
Nothing in the Bible supports that.
What? So now you're saying the wicked will not be resurrected?
Gen2rev said:
Nowhere in the Bible does it speak of an immortal soul
Gen2rev said:
That's not a Scriptural definition.
Then consider your post
here.
Gen2rev said:
You presented a verse, that you are purposely leaving out of this post so that you can't be called out about it
Gen2rev said:
Professed Christians who don't study Scripture don't ever learn the Truth about all the lies, and unbiblical doctrine, they are brainwashed to believe. If they'd only studied Scripture honestly, they could have been saved.
What is that saying?
Is it not saying... "I am right in what I say, and you are not. I am not one of those professed Christians who go through the motions, but are really brainwashed by lies and unbiblical doctrines."
Is it not pointing the finger, while proclaiming yourself righteous, or in the right.
Have I done that?

If I did though, and it's what you are doing, why would you condemn me? What would that say about you?
In my years of experience having Bible discussions with people, just simply telling people what the Bible says, and then saying that I have it right.. basically telling them that they are wrong, has never to my mind, been considered discussion. That's more arguing about who is right and who is wrong.
What I found works as a discussion, is asking questions, like "What do you think about...?" Then saying something like "Consider this..." or ""What do you think about looking at it this way? or "Have you given consideration to...?"
This is what I have been doing in this thread. Haven't I?