KJV Only...which one!

[Naomanos]

But what if KJB Only is in fact from GOD. You would be calling that which is good as evil. That's not good. In either case, I can see you simply do not want to discuss the topic (seeing you won't even explain Matthew 24:35 to me). If such is the case, I think it is time for me to move on from talking to you, friend. For there is no point in trying to show you something you refuse to see or discuss.

More of Bible Highlighter's MO.

He will only talk to you as long as you play along. Once you start to expose those cracks in his bias, he stops talking to you.

I have no need to explain a verse to him because God did something against BH's bias and because I won't, he, BH will stop talking to me.

Also, because according to him, I refuse to see his way of things, he will stop talking to me. So it's his way or the highway.

This is a doctrine straight from the pits of hell to cause division and strife, plain and simple.

 

[Naomanos]

Again, prayer only works when it is in line with what the Bible says. We may think God answered us, but sometimes this is not always the case. My point involving John 15:7, and a person believing Matthew 24:35 proves my point.

The take it up with God. My prayer was in line with the Bible. You don't think it was because it goes against your bias. You don't think God answered me because it goes against your bias.

Maybe it is your bias that needs to be reexamined.

 

[Bible Highlighter]

More of Bible Highlighter's MO.

He will only talk to you as long as you play along. Once you start to expose those cracks in his bias, he stops talking to you.

I have no need to explain a verse to him because God did something against BH's bias and because I won't, he, BH will stop talking to me.

Also, because according to him, I refuse to see his way of things, he will stop talking to me. So it's his way or the highway.

This is a doctrine straight from the pits of hell to cause division and strife, plain and simple.

Again, you appear to be making this about me and my tactics instead of dealing with explaining the evidences. So the ball is back in your court. Explain the evidences I presented or please move on. Explain Matthew 24:35 or move on. It's the evidence (biblical and historical) that I present to you dear sir. Please explain them in how they work with your belief.

In either case, may God bless you (even if we disagree with this topic).

 

[Bible Highlighter]

The take it up with God. My prayer was in line with the Bible. You don't think it was because it goes against your bias. You don't think God answered me because it goes against your bias.

Maybe it is your bias that needs to be reexamined.

If you are correct, then why are you refusing to explain Matthew 24:35?

 

[Naomanos]

Again, you appear to be making this about me and my tactics instead of dealing with explaining the evidences. So the ball is back in your court. Explain the evidences I presented or please move on. Explain Matthew 24:35 or move on. It's the evidence that I present to you dear sir.

In either case, may God bless you (even if we disagree with this topic).

Again, why must I do what you ask? God answered my prayer. You should be saying hallelujah! Not explain to me in your own words what this means.

Your bias needs to be reevaluated.

 

[Naomanos]

If you are correct, then why are you refusing to explain Matthew 24:35?

I have already explained that. Do try to keep up.

 

[Bible Highlighter]

I have already explained that. Do try to keep up.

Are you saying you explained Matthew 24:35? If so, which post #? If you are explaining why you don't feel the need to explain Matthew 24:35, this only hinders your case for your belief here, and it does not help it. I fail to see why explaining a simple verse would harm your position if it is indeed true.

 

[Bible Highlighter]

I have already explained that. Do try to keep up.

A Christian can say that they prayed that their belief in denying the Trinity was answered. Would you believe their prayer was answered by God in this instance? If so, how does that differ from your answered prayer?

 

[Naomanos]

Are you saying you explained Matthew 24:35? If so, which post #? If you are explaining why you don't feel the need to explain Matthew 24:35, this only hinders your case for your belief here, and it does not help it. I fail to see why explaining a simple verse would harm your position if it is indeed true.

No, I have already explained why I won't. I have no need to explain anything to you.

God answered my prayer. You either accept it or not.

 

[Naomanos]

A Christian can say that they prayed that their belief in denying the Trinity was answered. Would you believe their prayer was answered by God in this instance? If so, how does that differ from your answered prayer?

No, because denying the Trinity goes against what's in the Bible.

No where in the Bible does it state that God says that the English speaking population must read the KJV of the Bible and no others and that the KJV is the only perfect Bible. So, God answering my prayer of what Bible to read doesn't go against the Bible.

It goes against your bias however, so you should reevaluate that bias.

 

[Bible Highlighter]

No, I have already explained why I won't. I have no need to explain anything to you.

God answered my prayer. You either accept it or not.

Yet, another Christian on this forum prayed and God gave them him the answer that the KJB is the Word of God and the other Modern bibles were false. This Christian believed God answered his prayer. Are you saying that God answered both of you correctly?

 

[Bible Highlighter]

No, because denying the Trinity goes against what's in the Bible.

No where in the Bible does it state that God says that the English speaking population must read the KJV of the Bible and no others and that the KJV is the only perfect Bible. So, God answering my prayer of what Bible to read doesn't go against the Bible.

It goes against your bias however, so you should reevaluate that bias.

Ah, now I see. We get to the Bible, right? So it's not just pray which was my point before of why I brought up John 15:7, and Matthew 24:35. Yet, you have been refusing to explain these verses.

 

[Naomanos]

Yet, another Christian on this forum prayed and God gave them him the answer that the KJB is the Word of God and the other Modern bibles were false. This Christian believed God answered his prayer. Are you saying that God answered both of you correctly?

Nope.

 

[Naomanos]

Ah, now I see. We get to the Bible, right? So it's not just pray which was my point before of why I brought up John 15:7, and Matthew 24:35. Yet, you have been refusing to explain these verses.

I am refusing because I don't have to do what BH says. Why is this so hard to understand?

God answered my prayer. Your trying to sew seeds of doubt (hmm, who does this again? Oh, that's right the devil) that God answered my prayer.

It's not going to work. See, I apparently have more faith in God than you do. I know that He answered me. There is no question in my mind.

So, you may as well stop trying.

 

[Bible Highlighter]

I am refusing because I don't have to do what BH says. Why is this so hard to understand?

It really has nothing to do with me but it has to do with what the Bible says.

“Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.” (Jude 1:3).

Faith comes by hearing, and hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17).

2 Timothy 3:16-17
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.”

Granted, I do not think the Bible should tell us to do this. I think a Christian will naturally want to defend what the Bible says. But this is merely my own experience in walking with the Lord and the studying of His Word.

May God's peace be upon you.

 

[Naomanos]

It really has nothing to do with me but it has to do with what the Bible says.

“Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.” (Jude 1:3).

Faith comes by hearing, and hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17).

2 Timothy 3:16-17
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.”

Granted, I do not think the Bible should tell us to do this. I think a Christian will naturally want to defend what the Bible says.

I don't need to defend God answering my prayer. Why? Because his answer is not in question from me.

I suggest as I have done several times now, that you take it up with Him.

Will you do that?

 

[Bible Highlighter]

I don't need to defend God answering my prayer. Why? Because his answer is not in question from me.

I suggest as I have done several times now, that you take it up with Him.

Will you do that?

That would be like an Arian (Anti-Trinitarian) asking me to pray if Arianism is true. Such a prayer would be ridiculous. But I have prayed for explanations on supposed errors in the KJB and God answered that prayer many years later (Note: You can see the answer to this prayer with a point I repeated from another website with my #1 here). I have prayed for guidance on certain KJB Only topics (like the italicised words), and God answered that prayer for me with Scripture that explained it beautifully. Was your prayer even answered with Scripture? That's how God generally talks to me when I know He answers my prayers or when He wants to speak to me loudly about something.

 

[Naomanos]

Was your prayer even answered with Scripture

God doesn't always answer with scripture. God can answer anyway He wants, scripture isn't the only method.

Again, you're never going to get me to change my mind. God answered my prayer.

 

[Berserk]

"JesusFan1 to Enoch 111: "Can you show me the list where ANY scholar on the nas/esv/Nkjv translation teams became heretics, or denied the full inerrancy and inspiration of the originals?"

On the other hand. the KJV translators included a womanizing drunk, who was nevertheless competent in Bible languages. On this see the BBC documentary on the origin of the KJV.

JesusFan! to Enoch 111: "Do you read hebrew and Koine Greek though, as those texts have authority over the Kjv!"

Enoch 111: "Why would I do that when I have God's very preserved words that I can hold in my hands right now (i.e. the KJB)?"

Enoch acts as if Jesus and Paul spoke in King James English. He doesn't realize that the Bible cannot be accurately translated into English because for many theological and ethical terms in Hebrew and Greek there is no one-to-one English equivalent. That's why seminaries teach Hebrew and Greek.

 

[JesusFan1]

I am fully aware of the claims you have outlined. I simply disagree with your claims. They aren't true. Such claims are based on a book that was published in the mid to late eighties by a woman who didn't know anything about languages, text types, or the issues surrounding translations. Supposed doctrinal differences are based on misunderstanding and suspicion, not on actual fact.

Believe me, I have been aware of these claims since they first arrived and they are as false today as they were back then. ​

The Kjvo just need to read and heed the Preface on the 1611 Kjv