Dan, this is not all you said.
This is where you have misunderstood.so baptism was not necessary for salvation for the thief on the cross
We dont teach this.
Faith only folks say "what about the thief on the cross he wasn't baptized"
My position is you cannot make that claim because the Bible doesn't say if he was or was not baptized.
During the lifetime of the thief he would have been required to be baptized by John.
So, yes he was required to be baptized.
Was he? Only God knows and the thief himself.
Heres why the thief is not our example for salvation today.
He died under the old covenant.
We are not commanded to be baptized in John's baptism.
We are in the new covenant AFTER the Death, burial, ressurection of Christ.
So we are commanded to be baptized in Jesus' baptism.
The thief did not get saved by the gospel of Christ, 1Corinthians 15:1-4.
He never believed in Jesus' ressurection.
He was dead before Jesus rose from the dead.
So he was not saved by Jesus' new testament gospel.
We must believe in the death, burial and ressurection then be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ to be saved.
The thief was never commanded to do what we are told to do.
He is not our example for salvation today.
If he wasn't baptized he sinned.
Jesus forgave his sins on the cross.
But that is speculation and so it's wrong to even take a position one way or the other.