The ole Jacob and Esau story!As I have said, "free will" is not really the issue, it is complete autonomy. Only God, as Creator, is autonomous, He is sovereign over all His creation, of which we are a part.
Grace and peace to all.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The ole Jacob and Esau story!As I have said, "free will" is not really the issue, it is complete autonomy. Only God, as Creator, is autonomous, He is sovereign over all His creation, of which we are a part.
Grace and peace to all.
If someone today says they are a Protestant they are a member of a group that redefined the doctrine of orthodox theologians of the Catholic tradition. It's your blue and red perspective from the Protestant pov.From which contextual perspective? The Bible's or some theologians? If the sky is blue and some theologian says its red, are you going to believe that nonsense? So compare the two quotes and see that one says "blue" and the other says "red". If that is not a contradiction, then you have simply redefined it.
Only if Calvinism is correct and God determines everything we choose.IF God has chosen all to get saved, then either Satan or we are overcoming him!
None that God intended to save either got lost or failed to get saved!Only if Calvinism is correct and God determines everything we choose.
Reality: God gives us freedoms to go against Him. (Freewill)
Remember Paul taught, confession saves,
Romans 10:9-10
For with the heart one believes unto righteousness and with the mouth confession is made unto,salvation.
1John 4:15
Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him and he in God.
Fact: God gives us freewill to rebel against Gods love.
John 12:42-43
Nevertheless even among the rulers many believed in Him, but because of the Pharisees they did not confess Him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue;
For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.
God gives us freewill to go against Him.
Remember what Stephen said,
Acts 7:51
You stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit; as your Fathers did, so do you.
Yes, we can resist God. Not because He is not all powerfull. But because He allows it.
Well, He determines whom He will have mercy and compassion on, for sure. He does not "determine our choices." Our choices are always our own, but if our hearts ~ which God either changes into flesh or leaves as stone ~ remains stone... which, yes, may happen, in accord with God's will... then we will never choose Him. As Jesus told His disciples (and us, by extension), "You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide..." And this is exactly what Paul is saying in Ephesians 2, that "...God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ ~ by grace you have been saved ~ and raised us up with Him and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages He might show the immeasurable riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them."Only if Calvinism is correct and God determines everything we choose.
Well, yes, but only if He gives us up to ourselves and our own passions. This is Romans 1. For His elect, He sets them free from their bondage to sin and death.Reality: God gives us freedoms to go against Him. (Freewill)
Then God is a respecter of persons.None that God intended to save either got lost or failed to get saved!
I am not interested in having any discussion with You.Well, He determines whom He will have mercy and compassion on, for sure. He does not "determine our choices." Our choices are always our own, but if our hearts ~ which God either changes into flesh or leaves as stone ~ remains stone... which, yes, may happen, in accord with God's will... then we will never choose Him. As Jesus told His disciples (and us, by extension), "You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide..." And this is exactly what Paul is saying in Ephesians 2, that "...God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ ~ by grace you have been saved ~ and raised us up with Him and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages He might show the immeasurable riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them."
Well, yes, but only if He gives us up to ourselves and our own passions. This is Romans 1. For His elect, He sets them free from their bondage to sin and death.
Grace and peace to you.
That's quite okay with me. I, however, will post as I please, and will address whomever I please (as will you, I'm sure). I think what you're really "not interested in," Titus, is being proved wrong. And I can understand that, but, well, iron sharpens iron, my friend.I am not interested in having any discussion with You.
Not what I said at all. The only thing I ever said that I didn't care about (the only thing concerning you, specifically) is whether or not what I said ~ which was quite innocuous ~ bothered you.Because you made it quite clear you do not care about what I have to say.
Is that... a... command? :) See what I did there...?Leave me alone!
Those who ARE IN CHRIST are securely united for time and eternity.@Rudometkin My wife and I have been reading John 17 and it's so clear that just as Father and Son are united in their purpose, so also those who are in Christ are securely united with Him for time and eternity.
What a great point Titus...The biggest problem with Calvinist is their theology causing a lack of trust/faith in them.
If Calvin be correct, then God created some for reprobation.
Those who are ordained of God to be damned to hell, may believe they are elected.
Now, how can we trust possible reprobates, to teach us biblical truth?
We cannot know who is really chosen of God.
Could a reprobate be trusted when they are totally depraved and wicked?
If they are deceived into believing they are elected.
Then it is likely that they are teaching the doctrines of demons to those who God also wants to be deceived.
Thus, it is possible that local churches are founded by men who are not Gods people but deceived reprobates that preach a perverted gospel from satan.
I'm on my way to respond to Pinseeker, but I came upon this and just want to say thatCalvinism has an excellent comprehension of what GRACE means, and the other systematic philosophies do not understand GRACE properly at all. We are only saved by His grace.
People are born again of the Spirit as a first step in their salvation, otherwise they can not see, perceive the kingdom of God
People are born again according to the will of God, not the will of a man
All those not born again have ENMITY against God and Christ
All people not born again resist the Holy Spirit.
Christ chooses as an exercise of HIS WILL who knows God and Christ
The reason God saves some by His grace is His great love He has for them only and not the others
The reason we love God is because He loved us first and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins, ours being only the foreknown elect.
We are elect according to foreknowledge
Only 'the frozen chosen', will believe, all the rest are not chosen for salvation, God knew His elect from before time began as His people, so that number can not be modified, added or subtracted from, it is frozen in time.
Honestly the depravity of men and their spiritual condition of loving SATAN and the lusts of the flesh show they can not do the right thing with God and be obedient to God's command to repent and believe in Christ. If God did not predestine people, no one would follow Christ.
When you say differently, then it is not grace that saves but a work of your flesh, your will and not the work of God.
There us overwhelming scriptural proof for all the above. People generally presume way to much about their own ability to believe.
When God predestines people to believe, it makes the promise sure to all the seed. And the elect must be saved.
Romans 4:16
Therefore it is of faith that it might be according to grace, so that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all
2 Timothy 2:10
Therefore I endure all things for the sake of the elect, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
the elect must and will be saved and only the foreknown elect. The elect being born in a fallen condition have to go through the salvation experience. They are born elect, not born saved.
I don't have much time to spend on here PS and it seems like you're answers are no answer at all.That's not possible, because Calvin was Calvin. :)
Well, it's not. Hyper-Calvinism is a distortion of historical Calvinism.
Nope. Hyper-Calvinism is a distortion of true, historical Calvinism... what John Calvin believed and wrote.
Not really, no. A little more formal, maybe.
Yeah, that's a bit of a problem... :)
"Except for his theology"... LOL! I can guess what you "don't like"... :)
Yes, I know exactly what you're talking about. Yes, many people have a hard time embracing the reformed faith for several different reasons. It can be very offensive, so to speak, to hear that people are not autonomous "free agents," or the doctrine of limited atonement, or other things. Whatever it was, it's really kind of irrelevant because... he changed his mind. :)
Sproul's former thinking was not that it was illogical.
Well, if we are totally depraved ~ if the effects of Adam's fall was as extensive as the Bible says it is ~ then God's election must be unconditional of anything we might do, because, due to the state we are in, any requirement God has ~ much less what it really is, that we must be perfect (holy) because He is perfect (holy) ~ we will not do, and in fact do the opposite, if left in our natural state. That's exactly what Paul is telling us in Romans 1 through 7. If total depravity is accepted, though, everything else ~ with the possible exception of limited atonement ~ inevitably follows. If God changes the heart, makes the person alive by His Spirit, frees him from slavery to unrighteousness, he cannot help but choose God, not because God "forces him to choose" but because he knows his sin and sees (is no longer blind to) his need for salvation and that his only refuge is in Christ and His righteousness. The first step is to understand just what the Bible teaches us about the natural condition of man and his absolute inability to get himself out of this predicament, and in fact his consuming inclination not to get himself out of it.
I don't even know what this means. Hyper-Calvinism is a distortion of Calvinism, not an addition to it. What it is, in a nutshell, is an exaggeration of God's sovereignty to the exclusion of man's ability to choose or man's responsibility to respond positively. And this is really what Arminians object to, branding it as Calvinism when what they're really reacting negatively to is the hyper-Calvinistic view of things without really even knowing it... without really realizing that hyper-Calvinism is actually a thing.
Well, no, but you're welcome to your opinion. :)
In no way is this true. I get that that is sometimes the perception, but in no way is this true. God's absolute sovereignty over His creation affirms His love, and vice-versa.
Good. But in emphasizing God's love, you can't de-emphasize His sovereignty and justice, which you may not mean to do, but that's often the result.
How can we not be responsible for our actions?
No.
He did not deny that in any shape, form, or fashion. It applies to all who hear, but is only effectual for some. This is very close in concept to general vs. special revelation (see above), the latter of which is only given to His elect.
Well, how is it not???
He absolutely did not. The offer is made to everyone and is thus free and universal. But God only has mercy and compassion on, and changes the hearts of, by His Holy Spirit, some, His elect. This is according to His will, but it does not make his offer "not free" or "not universal."
Sure! Because they're misunderstanding what Calvin actually taught in the same way that hyper-Calvinists do, but then, having applyied a hyper-Calvinistic understanding of what Calvin actually taught ~ without even knowing it ~ react negatively instead of positively to this "understanding," which is really a misunderstanding.
Well, you tell me. :)
(1of 2)
'Free will Gospel" negates what happened to all of us save Jesus as a direct result of the fall!Well, He determines whom He will have mercy and compassion on, for sure. He does not "determine our choices." Our choices are always our own, but if our hearts ~ which God either changes into flesh or leaves as stone ~ remains stone... which, yes, may happen, in accord with God's will... then we will never choose Him. As Jesus told His disciples (and us, by extension), "You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide..." And this is exactly what Paul is saying in Ephesians 2, that "...God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ ~ by grace you have been saved ~ and raised us up with Him and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages He might show the immeasurable riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them."
Well, yes, but only if He gives us up to ourselves and our own passions. This is Romans 1. For His elect, He sets them free from their bondage to sin and death.
Grace and peace to you.
Sorry JesusFan'Free will Gospel" negates what happened to all of us save Jesus as a direct result of the fall!
The effects of the Fall of Adam, as there remains no more full free will, as sinners we were enslaved to those desires!Sorry JesusFan
What does the free will gospel negate?
Are you of the reformed faith too?The effects of the Fall of Adam, as there remains no more full free will, as sinners we were enslaved to those desires!
Adam and Eve spiritually died in the Fall!Are you of the reformed faith too?
If so, I have to say that I just don't see where in the OT our free will was taken away...
You have any verses that state this?
The Old and New Testament both teach that this is the natural human state and cannot be escaped at any point in our lives. We have a sinful nature from birth. Since this is our nature ~ we are naturally of satan ~ if we are not given a new nature ~ born again of by water and the Spirit and thus of God ~ we will not fail to choose wrongly regarding God and His salvation.Where does the N.T. state that being born with this depravity means we cannot choose to leave it behind?
That's exactly right, but our wishes are in accordance with our nature.Romans states we PRESENT OURSELVES to the one we wish to follow...
Yes, and the only way we can be perfect in God's eyes ~ credited righteousness, as Abraham was ~ is to be in Christ. Only then is there then therefore no condemnation for sin, even the smallest of sins.Do you think Jesus really meant that we are to be perfect?
Of course He knew. And in everything He said, He was exhorting His hearers (and by extension, us) to Himself. Which takes us back to the immediately preceding answer above.Did He not know that mankind was fallen and could not be perfect?
Well why does it matter to you whether it's the Old or the New Testament that says this? It shouldn't, as the Bible is all one story. In our natural state, we are dead in sin. In this way, we are blind. But you asked about the New Testament so, consider that, in our natural state, we "(do) not see fit to acknowledge God," as Paul says in Romans 1:28. In this way we are blind.Where does the N.T. state we are born blind?
Our wills are always our own. But there is a sense in which our wills are always in bondage. It is God that that changes the heart, but we should think of this not as God "destroying our free will," but rather freeing us from bondage to sin, or slavery to sin and unrighteousness.If it's God that changes the heart,,,where is our free will?
Adam was the federal head of the human race. From birth, we are in Adam, as his progeny. We inherited the same sinful ~ dead in sin ~ state that he fell into in Genesis 3.If it's God that changes the heart, how could we be responsible when we sin?
Yeah, discussing God's Word is always a good idea.Maybe if we discussed actual verses it would be better.
Now, by "verses from the Institutes," I guess you mean excerpts. There are no "verses" in the Institutes... :) I don't mean to be corrective here, but, well, you know. Just sayin.' :) At any rate, because one is predestined to do things does not mean he or she does not make a choice to do any or all of those very things.I posted a couple of verses from the Institutes that do not agree at all with what you say above. As far as Calvin understood and taught, EVERYTHING is predestinated by God.
Well, we can certainly say 'mystery,' but we should understand it in terms of wonder and even magnificence. That God's absolute sovereignty and man's free will coexist is a mystery in this sense, and probably cannot be completely grasped in our finite minds. David says in Psalm 139, "Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high; I cannot attain it." And so we can say the same thing, that such knowledge is too wonderful for us; it is high; we cannot attain it. But we can accept it, as David does. :)And how we could possibly reconcile that with our responsibility is called a mystery by those I hear speaking like Piper, Macarthur, etc.