Bible Highlighter
Well-Known Member
The one baptism is Christ's baptism of the great commission which was commanded, to be taught, that saves, that was administered by humans (disciples), it was how disciples were made and lasts till the end of time. None of these things are ever said about any kind of "spirit" baptism. Note Acts 8, the Spirit sent Phillip to WATER baptize the eunuch for that is how one is saved not by some spirit baptism. If 'spirit' baptism is what saved why the need for Phillip to water baptize? The Spirit could have done that apart from Phillip."Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life" Jesus is telling them to put more emphasis on the spiritual food over the physical food. Jesus is NOT literally telling them to not work for the physical food they eat for that violates 2 Thessalonians 3:10.
John 3:5-------Spirit ++++++++++ water >>>>>>>>>> in the kingdom
1 Cor 12;13---Spirit ++++++++++baptized >>>>>>>> in one body
Tts 3:5-------Holy Spirit +++++++washing >>>>>>>>> saved
Clearly the Bible shows this is WATER baptism. We already saw that Paul water baptized some of the Corinthians himself 1 Cor 1:14,17.
Paul said "we all" showing the universalism of this baptism among ALL Christians. One cannot be a Christian yet unbaptized..no such thing as an unbaptized Christian. All men have been commanded to be water baptized, the baptism of Christ's great commission that makes one a disciple, that saves that is administered by humans. No human can administer 'spirit' baptism only the Lord administed baptism with the Holy Spirit (Matthew 3:11).
This baptism of 1 Cor 12:13 is NECESSARY in order to be saved/be in the body for there is no salvation outside the body of Christ. Since water baptism has been commanded to all men and men can obey that command then if I have not been water baptized therefore not saved that is MY fault, MY culpability. Being baptized with the Holy Spirit is out of my control. Baptism with the HS has NEVER been commanded to anyone therefore cannot be obeyed. So those who are lost (outside the body) are lost due to God's fault and culpability in not having baptized them with the Holy Spirit. Baptism with the HS was never promised to anyone today, it was never commanded to anyone, it does not save, it is not how disciples are made, it does not last till the end of time and not administered by men. All of these things are only true of the water baptism of the great commission.
CONTEXT!!!! In Acts 1:1-5 Jesus was speaking to His Apostles promising only then baptism with the HS, not speaking to anyone today. And it was just the Apostles in Acts 2 that the HS fell upon on.
--Already showed from 1 Cor 1:12-13 one MUST be baptized to be "of" Christ,
--Paul DID water baptize and did not sin.
--1 Cor 1:17 is a not-but ellipsis where emphasis was put on preaching over baptizing but not to the total exclusion of baptizing.
Peter, in speaking about wives, used a not-but ellipsis: "Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price." Peter is saying wives should put more emphasis on the inward adorning over the outward adorning. Peter is NOT literally telling wives to not put on apparel no more than Paul was to not literally baptize (for he DID) but a placement of emphasis on one thing over another but NOT to the exclusion of either.
John 6:27 another not-but ellipsis:
Nothing in the text says Apollos needed to lean about some 'spirit' baptism.
[Bible Highlighter]
#6. Acts of the Apostles 19:1-7 says, “And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples, He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost. And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied. And all the men were about twelve.”
In other words, the believers at Ephesus only knew of John’s baptism of water, and they were not aware of the Holy Ghost. So Paul baptized them into the Holy Ghost by laying his hands on them. So they received the baptism of the Spirit.
It's water baptism that is the 'name of the Lord' Acts 2:38; Acts 10:47-48. Only God can baptize with the HS (Matt 3:11) no man can baptize with the HS.
Not of works of Eph 2:9 refers to works of merit. Water baptism, obedience to God, is never called a work of merit. If one could work to keep God's law perfectly sinless then that woild be something to boast about. But man's obedience will not be perfect so it is nothing to boast about.
Sorry, you have water on the brain whenever you read the baptism in the Scriptures. The context determines how that word is used. You cannot enforce your church’s belief over what the Bible says. You have already altered the plain reading 1 Corinthians 1:17 and Romans 10:13. So not sure our discussion is going to get anywhere with this kind of handling of the Word of God. These verses either mean plainly what they say or they don’t. Romans 11:6 says if it is grace it is no more works and if it is works it is no more grace. Again, you cannot in good conscience believe this verse plainly in what it says because you believe you are saved initially by a work.
Last edited: