Is the Bible the word of God?

[BreadOfLife]

Only a deceived fool would say that cutting off body parts, and collecting the organs of the DEAD, is... anything but Satanic.

And so is child molesting.
So, do you agree with that also?
If you dont then write the Pope a Letter, and tell him that Paul teaches that Peter had a wife, ......

Peter had a wife - BFORE he met Jesus. By the time we read about his mother in law (Luke 4:38-40). Many scholars surmise that since Peter's wife is missing in this story, she was probably already deceased,

While Paul does mention Peter’s marriage (1 Cor. 9:5), we read 2 chapters earlier about Paul’s advice of celibacy as a more excellent way to serve God (1 Cor. 7:32-35).

Your Scriptural ignorance is astounding . . .

and that if you teach "forbidding to marry", as the "cult of Mary" forbids their Priest, then this a "doctrine of devils"

And I already corrected you about his, Einstein. Paul is talking about the Gnostic heretics. Being so utterly lost iin heresy yourself – it’s NOT surprising that you can’t understand this.

The Gnostics of Paul’s time forbade marriage and the eating of certain foods.

...and it is causing these men, many of them, to become Pedophiles.

“Many” – or a small percentage?
Didn’t you learn your lesson from the last time you brought this up and I had to correct you?

Instead of obsessing over this issue in the Catholic Church – which has been dealt with and is now largely non-existent – worry about the epidemic of child molestation in your OWN Protestant sects . . .

How Protestant Churches Hid Sexual Abuse ...​

Blogger Who Exposed Protestant Sex Abuse Cover Up Sued By Her Pastor

Denial About Sexual Abuse In Evangelical Churches

Southern Baptists Apologize For Sex Abuse Coverups

Confronting Evangelical Enabling of Sexual Abuse

Bombshell: sex abuse, coverup in America's largest Protestant ...

Southern Baptist leaders covered up sex abuse, kept secret ...

Clergy Abuse Coverup within the Protestant Church

A History of Sex Abuse in the Protestant Imagination

FAQ: Sexual Abuse by Protestant Clergy - The Doan Law Firm​

1 in 10 Young Protestants Have Left a Church Over Abuse

Evangelicals ‘worse’ than Catholics on sexual abuse

Evangelical Sex Abuse Record ‘Worse’ Than Catholic, Says Billy Graham’s Grandson

Protestants can no longer dismiss abuse as a ‘Catholic problem’

Child Sex Abuse More Prevalent Among Protestants Than Among Catholics

There Is More Sexual Abuse In The Protestant Churches Than Catholic

Catholic priests no guiltier of sex abuse than other clergy

Data Shed Light on Child Sexual Abuse by Protestant Clergy

Blogger Who Exposed Protestant Sex Abuse Cover Up Sued By Her Pastor

Denial About Sexual Abuse In Evangelical Churches

Southern Baptists Apologize For Sex Abuse Coverups

U.S. Protestants’ Views Mixed about Extent of Clergy Sexual Abuse

Churchgoers Split on Existence of More Sexual Abuse by Pastors

Confronting Evangelical Enabling of Sexual Abuse

Child abuse a Calvinist problem, podcast says

Protestant Churches Grapple With Growing Sexual Abuse Crisis ​

​

Ted Haggard and His Wife Talk About the Gay Sex Scandal​

Adventist Women's Ministries | Statement on Child Sexual Abuse​

Healing the wounds of childhood sexual abuse - Adventist Record​

 

[MatthewG]

I think it’s just the written word, and not the actual “Word of God that became born of spirit and flesh.”

 

[amigo de christo]

I think it’s just the written word, and not the actual “Word of God that became born of spirit and flesh.”

What GOD inspires , GOD inspires . BIBLE TIME friends . far too many thinkers thinking they know GOD
when in truth their thoughts and doctrines Be a CONTRADICTING HIM . just a friendly reminder to all .
So tonight let all crack open that bible and be a feasting .

 

[Behold]

Peter had a wife - BFORE he met Jesus. By the time we read about his mother in law (Luke 4:38-40). Many scholars surmise that since Peter's wife is missing in this story, she was probably already deceased,

Paul is pointing out that several of the Apostles have wives.

So, the only thing that is "deceased" is your Theology.

 

[Behold]

Instead of obsessing over this issue in the Catholic Church – which has been dealt with and is now largely non-existent – worry about the epidemic of child molestation in your OWN Protestant sects . . .

From Genesis to Revelation (In a Bible), there is not a single case.........of an "infant, (baby)" being water baptized.

John the Baptist, didnt do it.
Jesus The Christ didnt do it.
Neither Paul, nor Peter, nor any Apostle or any person listed in the entire bible, "baptized infants".

Not once = .. not Ever.... = NEVER.

Yet, "the Cult of the virgin" says, its to be done, its "church tradition"., and if its not in a bible, well... who needs a bible when you have a Pope and "church fathers", and "Tradition".

And Here.... is a CATHOLIC Tradition, that (probably)... no Protestant knows anything about, and i'll share it..

A.) "The Cult of the Virgin", is into "RELICS".. They love antiquity related to past Saints, and so forth.

How much do they love gathering "relics'?
This "Cult of the Virgin" will exhume (dig up) a dead Christian, whom they defined as a canonized "SAINT".., and they will have a surgeon take parts of the body, as "relics". to collect., like you would collect stamps or coins.
This "cult of the Virgin" collects human parts...as found "inside the body".. or "pieces of the dead SAINT's thigh"... They will takes parts of the Body of a Saint they "dug up", and sometimes "dug up" a few times, and get some pieces of their body, that they want to keep...

They call these : "RELICS".
Im assuming the more famous body parts that have been removed from the more famous Catholic Saints, are in "The Vatican".

I call that situation..., = perverted demonic behavior,.... pretending to be "of God".

Can you imagine Jesus The Christ cutting off a part of some Apostle's dead body, to collect it?

So, WELCOME to "the cult of the Virgin".

 

[BreadOfLife]

From Genesis to Revelation (In a Bible), there is not a single case.........of an "infant, (baby)" being water baptized.

John the Baptist, didnt do it.
Jesus The Christ didnt do it.
Neither Paul, nor Peter, nor any Apostle or any person listed in the entire bible, "baptized infants".

Not once = .. not Ever.... = NEVER.

Yet, "the Cult of the virgin" says, its to be done, its "church tradition"., and if its not in a bible, well... who needs a bible when you have a Pope and "church fathers", and "Tradition".

And Here.... is a CATHOLIC Tradition, that (probably)... no Protestant knows anything about, and i'll share it..

That’s a pretty ignorant statement – even coming from YOU.
Allow me to educate you . . .

In the OT, circumcision was the way a Jew entered into the Covenant with God (Gen. 17:9). Baby boys were circumcised at 8-days old.

In the New Covenant, a person must be Baptized (Mark 16:16, John 3:5).
Both Peter and Paul Baptized entire households (Acts 10:1-49, 11:13-14, Acts 16:23-33, 1 Cor. 1:16).

The Early Church Fathers attested to Infant Baptism being an Apostolic mandate
Irenaeus
He [Jesus] came to save all through himself – all, I say, who through him are reborn in God; infants, and children, and youths, and old men. Therefore he passed through every age, becoming an infant for infants, sanctifying infants; a child for children, sanctifying those who are of that age . . . [so that] he might be the perfect teacher in all things, perfect not only in respect to the setting forth of truth, perfect also in respect to relative age (Against Heresies 2:22:4 [A.D. 189]).

Cyprian
As to what pertains to the case of infants: You [Fidus] said that they ought not to be baptized within the second or third day after their birth, that the old law of circumcision must be taken into consideration, and that you did not think that one should be baptized and sanctified within the eighth day after his birth. In our council it seemed to us far otherwise. No one agreed to the course which you thought should be taken. Rather, we all judge that the mercy and grace of God ought to be denied to no man born" (Letters 64:2 [A.D. 253]).

Augustine
It is this one Spirit who makes it possible for an infant to be regenerated . . . when that infant is brought to baptism; and it is through this one Spirit that the infant so presented is reborn. (Letters 98:2 [A.D. 408]).

A.) "The Cult of the Virgin", is into "RELICS".. They love antiquity related to past Saints, and so forth.

How much do they love gathering "relics'?
This "Cult of the Virgin" will exhume (dig up) a dead Christian, whom they defined as a canonized "SAINT".., and they will have a surgeon take parts of the body, as "relics". to collect., like you would collect stamps or coins.
This "cult of the Virgin" collects human parts...as found "inside the body".. or "pieces of the dead SAINT's thigh"... They will takes parts of the Body of a Saint they "dug up", and sometimes "dug up" a few times, and get some pieces of their body, that they want to keep...

They call these : "RELICS".
Im assuming the more famous body parts that have been removed from the more famous Catholic Saints, are in "The Vatican".

I call that situation..., = perverted demonic behavior,.... pretending to be "of God".

Can you imagine Jesus The Christ cutting off a part of some Apostle's dead body, to collect it?

So, WELCOME to "the cult of the Virgin".

And in your usual idiotic manner – you have completely ignored the fact that most first-class relics are in fact, bones.

Even after 2 posts, where I educated you about the use of ossuaries (bone boxes) all through antiquity including Jewish culture. Your “shock" and befuddlement only serves to magnify your incredible ignorance with regard to ALL things historical.

 

[BreadOfLife]

Paul is pointing out that several of the Apostles have wives.

So, the only thing that is "deceased" is your Theology.

And yet, what did Paul recommend as a better was to serve God?
CELIBACY (1 Cor. 7:32-38).

 

[Behold]

That’s a pretty ignorant statement – even coming from YOU.
Allow me to educate you . . .

You can't educate Christians with "Cult of Mary" Church Fathers.
That's a fail. - 100%

These are the same who believe that Mary flew to heaven in her dead body, and that cutting off the body parts of dead people is not pagan ritual.

 

[BreadOfLife]

You can't educate Christians with "Cult of Mary" Church Fathers.
That's a fail. - 100%

You mean, the SAME Church Fathers like Irenaeus and Augustine who your Protestant Fathers appealed to when formulating their heretical doctrines??

Now, you’re just arguing out of your backside . . .

These are the same who believe that Mary flew to heaven in her dead body, and that cutting off the body parts of dead people is not pagan ritual.

Soooo, YOU believe that Enoch and Elijah “flew” to Heaven by the power of God – but you don’t think that God had the power to assume Mary into Heaven?

Of ALL the idiotic things you’ve said so far – this is the most moronic . . .