BarneyFife
Well-Known Member
Futurism is the basis of prophecy
No, prophecy is simply history foretold.
so speaking against it is wrong
The cry of free speech and, thus, Everlasting Gospel cancelers everywhere
.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Futurism is the basis of prophecy
so speaking against it is wrong
You are the one who accepts what the RCC teaches about the mark and Preterism/Historicism
Good Morning,The theocracy was rejected when the people asked Samuel to give them a king so they could be like the other nations. It's a commonly held, Biblically accurate position.
"Sunday sacredness" is BADAll you've demonstrated above is that you have a vivid imagination. I see no evidence of any of the above in scripture, and it hasn't gone by unnoticed that you didn't use scripture as the basis for your ideas.
Allow me please to fill you in on a little history. You may confirm what I'm telling you quite really from the Vatican archives and other historical sources.
At the height of the reformation, the Catholic church convened an urgent church council in order to find ways to justify their own teachings in light of the flood of people converting to the faith of the Bible. Somehow Rome had to justify tradition, and find a way to rebuke the reformers and prove the scripture alone is a false doctrine, thus stemming the leaks in the Catholic doctrinal dam.
This council was held in Trent. Maye you've heard of it.
The upshot is that after much ruminating and discussion and debate, nothing could be found over many years until one bishop realised that the entire Protestant world were hypocrites because while teaching scripture alone, they didn't practise it because they kept a tradition of the Catholic church which is founded on no scripture, but merely Catholic tradition. Sunday sacredness. The Bishop was applauded, and everyone went home happy because they finally had an argument against scripture alone. Bishop Reggio of Milan I think. Don't quote me on that, memories a bit hazy as far as his name is concerned, but the he general details are correct. The council of Trent declared Sunday sacredness as an official Catholic tradition which was established with no biblical support whatsoever.
It is in the Gospel and the LORD said so = very clear!
MESSIAH said: “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill."
"IT IS THEREFORE THE DUTY OF THE PEOPLE OF GOD TO KEEP THE SABBATH." -Hebrews 4:9 PESHITTA
We're commanded to work the first six days of the week. So, not only are you demanding God grant you "rest" while trampling on the Sabbath, you also want Him to grant you PTO hours for the rest of the week?
I never understand why people think they can bargain with God over the terms of their salvation when the only thing they can bring to the bargaining table is a lost soul.
I've read and re-red your quote you posted where Jesus said ... "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill"@Big Boy Johnson says: "I've read and re-red your quote you posted where Jesus said ... "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill"
And Jesus is not saying "and thou slalt observeth Saturday sabbath or thou shalt burneth in helleth"
Got any other quotes that are actual calls to action?
I know there are no such calls to action by the Lord Himself or His teachings thru His Apostles... but this is be educational for you to search and see for yourself that there are no such calls to actions or instructions requiring Christians to observe Saturday sabbath which is nothing more then SDA per doctrine that they believe their salvation is based upon.
Still no call to action saying "and thou slalt observeth Saturday sabbath or thou shalt burneth in helleth"
Let's read what it actually says...
Hebrews 4:3-11
For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.
And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.
Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:
Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. (speaking about the New Covenant that He later established)
There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God.
For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.
Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.
Nothing here about observing Saturday sabbath, no call to action for Saturday... instead we are to enter in to His REST by believing, living in faith ceasing from our works as in trying to earn our salvation by doing good works such as going to church only on Saturday
Observing Saturday sabbath... does not earn your salvation! View attachment 41075
You have no scripture that say one is required to observe Saturday sabbath in order to be saved. View attachment 41074
The prophetic timeline has only one applicable interpretation: Protestant Historicism.No, they were wrong. They like many have confused a shadow or type of the beast for the actual beast.
Cool but the bible doesn't support that so go ahead and believe what your idea of the beast teaches you and keep thinking that is a great idea. What could go wrong?
Futurism is the basis of prophecy so speaking against it is wrong, and the opposite doctrine by any name is still another doctrine the RCC created, which some have swallowed whole. BTW, I am post trib.
lol, no. You are the one who accepts what the RCC teaches about the mark and Preterism/Historicism. You don't know what you are talking about. Go back and learn more from your beast and think it gives you special insight the bible never even speaks of.
"Sin is the transgression of the law" and "the soul that sinneth, it shall die". Breaking the 4th commandment makes you a "sinner".Still no call to action saying "and thou slalt observeth Saturday sabbath or thou shalt burneth in helleth"
I showed you what it actually says. The Peshitta does a better job with this verse than does the KJV, and if not for over 1,000 years of papal "Sunday sacredness", the KJV translators would have rendered it just as the Peshitta did.Let's read what it actually says...
Remember, verses 1 - 8 has "rest" translated from "kataposis" but verse 9 is "Sabbatismos" which SHOULD have been translated "Sabbath" instead of "rest". Lamsa did what the KJV translators were unable to do, due to over 1000 years of papal "Sunday sacredness".Nothing here about observing Saturday sabbath, no call to action for Saturday.
Of course, obedience doesn't earn salvation - it merely proves we've been saved.Observing Saturday sabbath... does not earn your salvation! View attachment 41075
Of course, salvation isn't obtained by "observance" - it's by faith.You have no scripture that say one is required to observe Saturday sabbath in order to be saved. View attachment 41074
God gave us the 'timeline' in Daniel.The prophetic timeline has only one applicable interpretation: Protestant Historicism.
Babylon, MP, Greece, Rome, Papacy.
What's your timeline?
Futurism is the basis of prophecy so speaking against it is wrong, and the opposite doctrine by any name is still another doctrine the RCC created, which some have swallowed whole.
God could have granted them judges - and endured their ceaseless grumbling for being denied a king. But, He granted them their wish after warning them of what would happen as a lesson in why we ought not choose imperfect human rulers prone to injustice and exploitation over the perfect, equitable, just rule of the Lord.God simply could of reverted back to the time of judges ruling over Israel.
He granted them their 'desire' = SaulGod could have granted them judges - and endured their ceaseless grumbling for being denied a king. But, He granted them their wish after warning them of what would happen as a lesson in why we ought not choose imperfect human rulers prone to injustice and exploitation over the perfect, equitable, just rule of the Lord.
Matthew 5:17 is the Foundation for the Truth of the Law that the LORD walked in on our behalf AND by which
The LORD directly restated Exodus 31:12-17 but under NEW COVENANT Terms.
"Sin is the transgression of the law" and "the soul that sinneth, it shall die". Breaking the 4th commandment makes you a "sinner".
I showed you what it actually says.
Remember, verses 1 - 8 has "rest" translated from "kataposis" but verse 9 is "Sabbatismos" which SHOULD have been translated "Sabbath" instead of "rest". Lamsa did what the KJV translators were unable to do, due to over 1000 years of papal "Sunday sacredness".
Of course, obedience doesn't earn salvation - it merely proves we've been saved.
Just like disobedience when we know better proves the absence of salvation.
Of course, salvation isn't obtained by "observance" - it's by faith.
@Big Boy Johnson says: "Jesus is responsible for the Truth of His Word being taught thru His Apostles and it's thru His teaching ministry thru His Apostles that we learn of the high standard brought forth in the New Covenant... the REST God's people follow not is not on any one day, Saturday or Sunday."That's your imagination running wild.... He said nothing about observing one day of the week as being holy and that day is Saturday
Jesus is responsible for the Truth of His Word being taught thru His Apostles and it's thru His teaching ministry thru His Apostles that we learn of the high standard brought forth in the New Covenant... the REST God's people follow not is not on any one day, Saturday or Sunday.
So your claim is that if one does not go to church on Saturday they are not in right standing with the Lord and on their way to hell?
Please show me in the New Testament warnings the let people know that not going to church on Saturday is a sin.
There's all kinds of warnings in the New Testament about what is sinful behavior... but you'll not find one scripture in the NT that says not going to church on Saturday is a sin. View attachment 41089
No, actually you pulled one scripture out of context and put yo eisegesis whammy on it to come up with your false claim... you put the SDA indoctrination on it View attachment 41085
And yet... still nothing about Saturday sabbath, or Sunday either for that matter.
So your claim is one must go to church on Saturday to "prove" they are saved!View attachment 41086
Then the SDA position that "only those that go to church on Saturday are saved" is a moot point.
Glad we got this all cleared up! View attachment 41087
Since you now acknowledge that one does not have to observe Saturday sabbath to be saved and these discussion are irrelevant and a waste of time.. the sabbath threads can all be closed down now. Thanks! View attachment 41088
@Phoneman777 @Big Boy Johnson @BarneyFife"Sin is the transgression of the law" and "the soul that sinneth, it shall die". Breaking the 4th commandment makes you a "sinner".
I showed you what it actually says. The Peshitta does a better job with this verse than does the KJV, and if not for over 1,000 years of papal "Sunday sacredness", the KJV translators would have rendered it just as the Peshitta did.
Remember, verses 1 - 8 has "rest" translated from "kataposis" but verse 9 is "Sabbatismos" which SHOULD have been translated "Sabbath" instead of "rest". Lamsa did what the KJV translators were unable to do, due to over 1000 years of papal "Sunday sacredness".
Of course, obedience doesn't earn salvation - it merely proves we've been saved.
Just like disobedience when we know better proves the absence of salvation.
Of course, salvation isn't obtained by "observance" - it's by faith.
Keeping the commandments is merely outward evidence of our inward faith - and disobedience is the outward evidence of our inward decision to refuse "rest in Christ".
Amen. There's no other way to interpret Daniel and Revelation except by Protestant Historicism. Unfortunately, Christians today prefer either Jesuit Preterism so that tribulation can be safely relocated to the past, or Jesuit "Left Behind" Futurism so Jesus can sneak into town and sneak out with the saints just before the "7 year tribulation".God gave us the 'timeline' in Daniel.
The LORD Jesus confirmed that 'timeline'.
The Apostlee also confirmed the 'timeline'.
Revelation enables us to SEE it actuated BEFORE it hits us.
Hey Brother = THANK YOU for this:Amen. There's no other way to interpret Daniel and Revelation except by Protestant Historicism. Unfortunately, Christians today prefer either Jesuit Preterism so that tribulation can be safely relocated to the past, or Jesuit "Left Behind" Futurism so Jesus can sneak into town and sneak out with the saints just before the "7 year tribulation".
It basically comes down to this: Protestant Historicism is rejected either for reasons of cowardice or sensationalism - they're either scared to death of a martyr's death, or the thrill of looking East for prophetic fulfillment simply can't be found looking West to Rome.
However, the Commandment to REST or DEATH is still in EFFECT as stated in Exodus ch31 but now is BINDING on ALL the world.
Where did the LORD Jesus Christ state this Declaration of REST or DEATH?
Before i give you the LORD'S direct statement, i have this question for you and @Phoneman777, all SDA's and all who Believe.WHERE in the New Testament does God's Word say those that do not observe Saturday sabbath are... in sin??? View attachment 41107
Let's see what you pull out yo backside to answer that! View attachment 41108