For some reason ,safari said that they couldn’t open the page..I would have like to have viewed that.
Its on YouTube try this link…
Risks verses benefits of blood transfusions.
This video, posted on The Australian Government’s website, was a warning, and exposed the risks of blood transfusions verses the benefits, and outlines two key reasons why people should weigh up their decision based on the facts rather than the medical profession’s now outdated opinion.
Two unwanted effects are “increased morbidity” (serious complications) and “mortality” (death) “more so than any other medical intervention” And this as a direct result of the procedure. The doctors in the video are medical professionals in this field of medicine.
You are certainly right about the risks of transfusion, in my days ,Aunty, the blood that I received after I haemorrhaged giving birth..wasn’t screened...I was fortunate or it appears that the blood they gave me wasn’t infected..with hepatitis c or HIV etc...I believe the blood they give now is screened...would you trust that?..if you needed a blood transfusion?
God’s law on consuming blood has never changed, and in fact, it was repeated three times in three different eras in the Bible. Taking blood into the body in any manner is against his law. Like sexual immorality, this carried the death penalty….so for us it is not a personal decision like vaccination….it is clearly stated.
The risks outlined in the video show us that blood is as unique to a person as their fingerprints. To introduce a living foreign substance, such as a virus or bacteria, sends the body’s immune system into combat mode. Precious resources are marshaled into combatting the invader…..and so the same applies to blood….it is a living substance.…and as such it came to represent life itself, as all living, breathing souls have blood in their veins to carry oxygen to every cell in the body. When the body’s energy is directed to fighting the invader, our ability to recover is compromised.
More people die after a blood transfusion than who ever die for refusing one. Jehovah’s Witnesses have proven it. The reasons are outlined in the video…I hope you can access it.
Acts 15:28-29 was a mandate to Christians that was not negotiable….
”For the holy spirit and we ourselves have favored adding no further burden to you except these necessary things: 29 to keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols, from blood, from what is strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you carefully keep yourselves from these things, you will prosper.”
So the law of Moses with its many rules was abolished because Christ has fulfilled it, resulting in a permanent sacrifice covering our sins, as long as we observed those “necessary things”.
If I hadn’t of had the blood transfusion I would have died...I believe I was meant to have that transfusion and that God saved my life...all those 50 odd years ago....
You had the doctor’s opinion on that….we have been told that for decades….but in hindsight, someone else’s unique blood was put into your body, do you know what came with it?…….and if you are admitted to hospital here in Australia, one of the questions they ask every patient on admission is…”Have you EVER had a blood transfusion?” Why do you think they would need to ask that? What do they know that they do not tell us?
Knowing that there are safer alternatives is my reason for posting this information, as it vindicates God’s law on the use of blood, and tells the truth that a multi-million dollar insustry doesn’t want you to know.
Abstaining from blood came with the promise…”you will prosper”.
For Jehovah’s Witnesses, this has always been true.
Let me know if the link fails and I will see if I can post it directly off the website…..it’s definitely worth watching.
