Harvard professors argue that America needs a 'militant democracy' to stop Trump

[Taken]

@Reggie Belafonte

It, ( the corruption and frustration has finally taken notable center stage for Revealing and Combatting… and is sending Fear into the backroom plotters cushy domaine.)

It has been a decades long process of cunningly redefining words to mean opposites, and public education indoctrination in that younger generations know not the difference.

The front ear tickle is “own nothing…while deserving and having every want / desire void of effort and true facts”.

God bless you.

Glory to God,
Taken

 

[Brakelite]

One common thread running through these current event and political discussions is a lack of a true biblical perspective, that of realising and acknowledging that we fight not against flesh and blood but spiritual wickedness...aka demonic powers... in heavenly places. The Democrats, the liberals, the gays, trans, socialists, university professors, nor even the dumbed down victims of the modern American education system, nor even the outspoken left wing dupes of Hollywood and the liberal media, not one or all of these are your enemy.
It really seems to me that American evangelical Christianity, despite the many noble causes it espouses, is fighting the wrong battle. The warfare isn't carnal, it's spiritual. And the weapons of that warfare are also spiritual. The principle one being the gospel. Preaching the crucified and risen Jesus as the loving Saviour and Lord Who holds the power to redeem and deliver those people from their false ideas and humanistic ideals. Is Jesus being presented as the loving Lord Who seeks to heal, forgive, and restore humanity and recreate man in His own image? Or is He being presented as a judge and vindictive vengeful God Who is seeking to take out His adversaries at the first opportunity?

 

[bluedragon]

Let's take this to the Supreme Court.

I would enjoy seeing the decision started with "Harvard Professors should learn to read the Dictionary." A grant is a gift .....Not a guarantee.

 

[amigo de christo]

@Reggie Belafonte

It, ( the corruption and frustration has finally taken notable center stage for Revealing and Combatting… and is sending Fear into the backroom plotters cushy domaine.)

It has been a decades long process of cunningly redefining words to mean opposites, and public education indoctrination in that younger generations know not the difference.

The front ear tickle is “own nothing…while deserving and having every want / desire void of effort and true facts”.

God bless you.

Glory to God,
Taken

in part that is true my friend . BUT IT AINT the only ear tickling event that has been going on my friend .
But yeah this own nothing and being happy is a tool to feed the lazy who refuse to work
a delusion of a utopia that will provide their every need and desire .
THE THING IS , the BLIND that embrace and love it
have no idea ITS ONLY A SNARE . a snare that will surely not fullfill the promises it has given to them
but rather will , SERVE THE ELITES . not the poor . this people is very blind indeed .

 

[amigo de christo]

Let's take this to the Supreme Court.

I would enjoy seeing the decision started with "Harvard Professors should learn to read the Dictionary." A grant is a gift .....Not a guarantee.

yea rather my advice is
we take all things we hear to THE SUPREME GOD in prayer .
Cause In the end , HE BE THE ONE , HIS CHRIST BE THE ONE
who is THE JUDGE of all . and it wont bode well for those who sat under men
who preached contrary to HIM .

 

[Taken]

in part that is true my friend . BUT IT AINT the only ear tickling event that has been going on my friend .
But yeah this own nothing and being happy is a tool to feed the lazy who refuse to work
a delusion of a utopia that will provide their every need and desire .
THE THING IS , the BLIND that embrace and love it
have no idea ITS ONLY A SNARE . a snare that will surely not fullfill the promises it has given to them
but rather will , SERVE THE ELITES . not the poor . this people is very blind indeed .

Yes it’s a snare. Once in the web, they have total control to systematically eliminate to reach their agenda of decreased World Population, “keeping the useful”, having millions fewer to exert the effort of Controlling.

 

[amigo de christo]

Yes it’s a snare. Once in the web, they have total control to systematically eliminate to reach their agenda of decreased World Population, “keeping the useful”, having millions fewer to exert the effort of Controlling.

well its good you see it for the snare it is my friend .
But would you mind telling me
why on earth many cannot see the snare of this interfaith finding common ground , WHICH I KNOW IS OF ANTI CHRIST .
I mean dang man . it seems so few can now see the deadly dangers in that LIE
that is and will merge all to be as one under a fat lie too .

 

[amigo de christo]

Yes it’s a snare. Once in the web, they have total control to systematically eliminate to reach their agenda of decreased World Population, “keeping the useful”, having millions fewer to exert the effort of Controlling.

IF folks find it hard to beleive that the finding common ground interfaith came of the SAME PROGRESSIVE liberal mindset
THEN DO YOUR HOMEWORK . The RCC , the most liberal minds BROUGHT THIS LIE unto the evangelical realm .
AND MANY DO ITS WORK taken . vance could not kiss the south end of this pope enough . THEY ARE IN BED
my friend WITH THE SAME LIE . We gots to flee it and now . flee it and now and dont ever look back .

 

[Ronald Nolette]

On the news came up and important issue for US citizens to consider regarding possible constitutional rights violations promoted by both parties as desired in an article PDF on Harvard edu site which I also will link below. The Republican contender is the Fox news article and the democrat contender is the CNN news article. Little bit of toxic humor for good measure, hope it's not too offensive ;)

Harvard professors argue that America needs a 'militant democracy' to stop Trump

Harvard professors argue that America needs a 'militant democracy' to stop Trump

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics...donald-trump-democracy-threat-intv-newday.cnn

https://scholar.harvard.edu/sites/s...latt/files/chapter_8_ziblatt_and_levitsky.pdf

In the article from harvard.edu it states:

"A second strategy for confronting authoritarians—known as militant or defensive democracy—also emerged out of the trauma of 1930s Europe. The idea is that government authority and the law can be used to exclude and aggressively prosecute antidemocratic forces. The strategy was first implemented in post–World War II West Germany. Haunted by the experience of Hitler’s rise to power, the country’s postwar constitutional designers didn’t want their democratic government to stand by helplessly in the face of authoritarian threats from within"

=====================================================================

The two news articles appear to emphasize different language regarding a Harvad.edu article. I'm not sure I found the same article by the same author but the one above appears to discuss and old WWII idea. On the one side of their idea is a Trump republican candidate that they say are concerned about authoritarian conduct. And on the other side a promotion of militant or defensive democracy. Neither is related to the idea of the founding fathers constitution governing freedom of the citizens from government abuses or citizen abuses against citizens.

With the recent "considered" legal and also illegal immigration I find a statistic related to foreign-born citizens:

"he foreign-born or immigrant population (legal and illegal) hit new record highs in March 2024 of 51.6 million and 15.6 percent of the total U.S. population. Since March 2022 the foreign-born population has increased 5.1 million, the largest two-year increase in American history." Foreign-Born Population Grew by 5.1 Million in the Last Two Years

I certainly hope that the illegal influx of immigrants is addressed and that any persons that were brought in under the claim of "legal immigrant" has sworn the oath of citizenship and accepts the USA constitution and citizen duties as a core belief for their new life in the United States. I also hope that universities also adhere to those principles. The oath can be found here which relates to the news articles:

Chapter 2 - The Oath of Allegiance

“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

=========================================================================

To be honest, WWII was a traumatic and horrific war where American military and citizens lost their lives and loved ones, including my own family history. A good research on factual information related to that war and the different countries activities including war atrocities is invited. It is a massive information area that I'm not sure is fully covered for certain reasons.

The current election is an interesting one given the current state of world and US affairs. Cheers to All! ;)

Can anyone say Coup d'etat

 

[Taken]

well its good you see it for the snare it is my friend .
But would you mind telling me
why on earth many cannot see the snare of this interfaith finding common ground , WHICH I KNOW IS OF ANTI CHRIST .
I mean dang man . it seems so few can now see the deadly dangers in that LIE
that is and will merge all to be as one under a fat lie too .

Interfaith… depending on what interfaith “contextually” means to an individual… seems to be “broad”.

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “have faith”?

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “have faith in “a” god?

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “have faith in “Different gods”?

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “can respect the others “godly choices”, and co-exist peaceably on this earth?

Now “consider”, the Nations of the World and the citizens of Differing Nations, AND “How Much” or “How Little”… the LAWS and STATUTES factor in, PER the “Religious Standing AND the GOVERNANCE of Said Nations and her “citizens”. —->

^^^ HERE is where the “conflict” arises.
* Some Nations “Require” their “citizens” to “Believe” in a “particular” Named, Titled, Described “god.”

* Some Nations “Do Not Require” their “citizens” to “Believe” in “Any” god.
* But Do “Require” it’s citizens (and alien visitors) to be Governed by, and “subject to” a Lawful set of Laws and Statutes “established UNDER the Principles and Standards” of “a” particular “god”.

( An individual of Foreign Descent, legally entering the US, are under “agreement” to abide by “Laws and Statutes” “established UNDER the Principles and Standards of the Heavenly Creator and Maker, Lord God Almighty”….is called “assimilation”…
And still “retain” the right to ”WORSHIP” their “god”, as they choose.

They HAVE “forfeited” their “right” to legally use “their gods’” punishment, treatment between men kind, that which is Against the established “Laws and Statutes” of THIS Nation.

It is an ongoing issue, when citizens of Differing Nation attempt to Domicile together, and NOT comprehend…
Worship is one thing of common ground among ALL men…who acknowledge “a” god.

It is another thing to “enter a foreign nation” and Attempt to “undermine” that Nations established “Laws and Statutes”…. And think they have a pass, because they “worship a different god, or have no god”.

Every ( political )“Servant” in the US, takes an Oath, by their WORD to uphold, defend and protect the Established US Constitution.
Following the Oral Oath, they Attest to their Oral Oath, by Signing their Signature of Their name to a Document …so Dated on the Document that the Date IS:
in the year of our Lord”.

In the US, “Our Lord legally, IS Christ Jesus”.
If that is Not “their” Lord…did they Lie?

It’s a conundrum. How to decipher Differences in “gods” men choose to “Worship”…and Oaths men and women take and attest to with “differing “”Lords”.
To thereafter “expect” such Servants to literally BE on the same “our” “same” page of “limited governance authority over the Citizens at large”.

Jesus taught…to be welcoming of foreigners to live amongst the Jews…UNTIL…the foreigners attempt to Sway, Encourage, Jews to abandon “their God” and “assimilate” with “other gods”.

I have no issue with individuals Learning About others Beliefs / Faiths / Religions / branch denominations. It is the individual who chooses his own “Standing” with whatever “god” he chooses to Worship, and enjoy or suffer the “consequences”.

FREEWILL is Gods design integrated in His Creation of manKind. People will Freely pick, choose, reject as they please, and the consequence Be their own.

Glory to God,
Taken

 

[amigo de christo]

Interfaith… depending on what interfaith “contextually” means to an individual… seems to be “broad”.

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “have faith”?

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “have faith in “a” god?

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “have faith in “Different gods”?

Is it “common ground” that two different individuals “can respect the others “godly choices”, and co-exist peaceably on this earth?

Now “consider”, the Nations of the World and the citizens of Differing Nations, AND “How Much” or “How Little”… the LAWS and STATUTES factor in, PER the “Religious Standing AND the GOVERNANCE of Said Nations and her “citizens”. —->

^^^ HERE is where the “conflict” arises.
* Some Nations “Require” their “citizens” to “Believe” in a “particular” Named, Titled, Described “god.”

* Some Nations “Do Not Require” their “citizens” to “Believe” in “Any” god.
* But Do “Require” it’s citizens (and alien visitors) to be Governed by, and “subject to” a Lawful set of Laws and Statutes “established UNDER the Principles and Standards” of “a” particular “god”.

( An individual of Foreign Descent, legally entering the US, are under “agreement” to abide by “Laws and Statutes” “established UNDER the Principles and Standards of the Heavenly Creator and Maker, Lord God Almighty”….is called “assimilation”…
And still “retain” the right to ”WORSHIP” their “god”, as they choose.

They HAVE “forfeited” their “right” to legally use “their gods’” punishment, treatment between men kind, that which is Against the established “Laws and Statutes” of THIS Nation.

It is an ongoing issue, when citizens of Differing Nation attempt to Domicile together, and NOT comprehend…
Worship is one thing of common ground among ALL men…who acknowledge “a” god.

It is another thing to “enter a foreign nation” and Attempt to “undermine” that Nations established “Laws and Statutes”…. And think they have a pass, because they “worship a different god, or have no god”.

Every ( political )“Servant” in the US, takes an Oath, by their WORD to uphold, defend and protect the Established US Constitution.
Following the Oral Oath, they Attest to their Oral Oath, by Signing their Signature of Their name to a Document …so Dated on the Document that the Date IS:
in the year of our Lord”.

In the US, “Our Lord legally, IS Christ Jesus”.
If that is Not “their” Lord…did they Lie?

It’s a conundrum. How to decipher Differences in “gods” men choose to “Worship”…and Oaths men and women take and attest to with “differing “”Lords”.
To thereafter “expect” such Servants to literally BE on the same “our” “same” page of “limited governance authority over the Citizens at large”.

Jesus taught…to be welcoming of foreigners to live amongst the Jews…UNTIL…the foreigners attempt to Sway, Encourage, Jews to abandon “their God” and “assimilate” with “other gods”.

I have no issue with individuals Learning About others Beliefs / Faiths / Religions / branch denominations. It is the individual who chooses his own “Standing” with whatever “god” he chooses to Worship, and enjoy or suffer the “consequences”.

FREEWILL is Gods design integrated in His Creation of manKind. People will Freely pick, choose, reject as they please, and the consequence Be their own.

Glory to God,
Taken

That is the problem my friend . You have no issues at all with the decieved remaining decieved .
I do . Because i desire LIFE for them , NOT death . Where is the love my friend . I dont see it .
The evangelical realm has taken the bait . The progressive liberal now rules the evangelical realm and they have no idea
it does . You should care . but it seems many rather care more about the easy life and who can give them
their desires rather than the souls of men . These are very sad days indeed .
I pray you see the error fast my friend .

 

[Reggie Belafonte]

Look what the MSM call the Hard Right Wingers ?

A dude I seen on TV today was speeking against, himself and other Australian born people, being welcomed to Country !

So what has happened regarding the far Left Socialist bag of tricks and demands, is that they have pushed for the people who are born in Australia to accept that they are second class citizens in fact !

So anyone with a brain would know and say, Do not welcome me to my own Country ! So this dude turned around and said, that he did not want to be welcomed to his own Country !

He has been branded as a Far Right Wing extremist !

Now an Aboriginal is a full blood person in fact, the people here before Cook !
Now once you have a Pom etc and an Aboriginal have a child that Child is not an Aboriginal in fact, but a mulato ? Half and half ! so that one is 50/50 ? now next child of that person becomes what blood % if has a Pom dad and mum ? hey ! and then the next ? So then I am 5th generation Australian, so I am more Australian than most so called Abo's in fact !

So why should I put up with little snotty noses fools like our PM play such stupid idiot cunning stupid games Demanding we all accept his demands, because this little good for nothing boy man queer fruitloop is only a 1st generation Australian himself, not to mention he grew up without a Dad. and on the Government Tip easy street.
He is still a little boy mentality typical of Socialist childish deranged values ! they demand all swallow their values in fact ! Typical of all Socialist ! the card is played that he is uniting the people ? No he is forcing compliance ! because he is only a Boy on such subjects.

 

[Taken]

That is the problem my friend . You have no issues at all with the decieved remaining decieved . I do.

You should care .

but it seems many rather care more about the easy life and who can give them
their desires rather than the souls of men .

Do enlighten me…
“How exactly” do “YOU” “care”?
Talk “about them”?
Talk TO “evangelicals”?
Go to “their” meetings and “shout out
your Objections”?
Brow beat “them” ?

“How” did you “determine” I do NOT care what becomes of another's “soul”?

 

[Jericho]

There's a WW2 skit where one Nazi soldier notices all the skull badges on his uniform and asks the other Nazi soldier, "Are we the baddies?" I feel that is where we are at. There is a total disconnect with reality with people like this professor. They have this distorted view that justifies this sort of rhetoric and sometimes outright violence and vandalism, all the while thinking we are the baddies when it's really them.

 

[amigo de christo]

Do enlighten me…
“How exactly” do “YOU” “care”?
Talk “about them”?
Talk TO “evangelicals”?
Go to “their” meetings and “shout out
your Objections”?
Brow beat “them” ?

“How” did you “determine” I do NOT care what becomes of another's “soul”?

you wrote and said you dont care what one believes . HEY you wrote it and i only responded .
ENOUGH with satans interfaith co exist anti christ lie .
Warn folks . PAUL DID , they all did . ITs not a sin to warn men to repent and believe on JESUS
and its not a sin to warn brethren in error to repent of said error .

 

[Taken]

you wrote and said you dont care what one believes . HEY you wrote it and i only responded .
ENOUGH with satans interfaith co exist anti christ lie .
Warn folks . PAUL DID , they all did . ITs not a sin to warn men to repent and believe on JESUS
and its not a sin to warn brethren in error to repent of said error .

you wrote and said you dont care what one believes . HEY you wrote it and i only responded .
ENOUGH with satans interfaith co exist anti christ lie .
Warn folks . PAUL DID , they all did . ITs not a sin to warn men to repent and believe on JESUS
and its not a sin to warn brethren in error to repent of said error .

Do enlighten me…
“How exactly” do “YOU” “care”?
Talk “about them”?
Talk TO “evangelicals”?
Go to “their” meetings and “shout out
your Objections”?
Brow beat “them” ?

 

[shepherdsword]

I challege anyone to show

On the news came up and important issue for US citizens to consider regarding possible constitutional rights violations promoted by both parties as desired in an article PDF on Harvard edu site which I also will link below. The Republican contender is the Fox news article and the democrat contender is the CNN news article. Little bit of toxic humor for good measure, hope it's not too offensive ;)

Harvard professors argue that America needs a 'militant democracy' to stop Trump

Harvard professors argue that America needs a 'militant democracy' to stop Trump

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics...donald-trump-democracy-threat-intv-newday.cnn

https://scholar.harvard.edu/sites/s...latt/files/chapter_8_ziblatt_and_levitsky.pdf

In the article from harvard.edu it states:

"A second strategy for confronting authoritarians—known as militant or defensive democracy—also emerged out of the trauma of 1930s Europe. The idea is that government authority and the law can be used to exclude and aggressively prosecute antidemocratic forces. The strategy was first implemented in post–World War II West Germany. Haunted by the experience of Hitler’s rise to power, the country’s postwar constitutional designers didn’t want their democratic government to stand by helplessly in the face of authoritarian threats from within"

=====================================================================

The two news articles appear to emphasize different language regarding a Harvad.edu article. I'm not sure I found the same article by the same author but the one above appears to discuss and old WWII idea. On the one side of their idea is a Trump republican candidate that they say are concerned about authoritarian conduct. And on the other side a promotion of militant or defensive democracy. Neither is related to the idea of the founding fathers constitution governing freedom of the citizens from government abuses or citizen abuses against citizens.

With the recent "considered" legal and also illegal immigration I find a statistic related to foreign-born citizens:

"he foreign-born or immigrant population (legal and illegal) hit new record highs in March 2024 of 51.6 million and 15.6 percent of the total U.S. population. Since March 2022 the foreign-born population has increased 5.1 million, the largest two-year increase in American history." Foreign-Born Population Grew by 5.1 Million in the Last Two Years

I certainly hope that the illegal influx of immigrants is addressed and that any persons that were brought in under the claim of "legal immigrant" has sworn the oath of citizenship and accepts the USA constitution and citizen duties as a core belief for their new life in the United States. I also hope that universities also adhere to those principles. The oath can be found here which relates to the news articles:

Chapter 2 - The Oath of Allegiance

“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

=========================================================================

To be honest, WWII was a traumatic and horrific war where American military and citizens lost their lives and loved ones, including my own family history. A good research on factual information related to that war and the different countries activities including war atrocities is invited. It is a massive information area that I'm not sure is fully covered for certain reasons.

The current election is an interesting one given the current state of world and US affairs. Cheers to All! ;)

If he thinks the military would side with the woke neocommie ultra-left he has another thing coming

 

[Reggie Belafonte]

I challege anyone to show

If he thinks the military would side with the woke neocommie ultra-left he has another thing coming

You would think so !

But I know a lot of people in the ADF who are Dupes ! leftys. and gutless, who will do anything, they are told how to think ! they live in total feer of looking things up on line.

The Head of our ADF who is gone now, openly said he hated Australian men in the ADF ! did not like them at all because to many of they were good people in fact !
Real people not wind bags, who were like the UK in WW2 where Australians did not salute the Pommys because they did not respect such people.
That's the Aussie Spirit of real men ! not back sliding whimps, that our ADF promotes nowadays, just some wind bag that does not question nonsense from deranged filth Evil men in power That was just of the same ilk as the Nazi total evil power that was demanded over the men !

It comes from the very same pure Evil cunning Sodomites who totaly love dictating over everyone like a mongrel dog in fact, that who they are at the top, all wind bags of evil Governments intent over the People !

I know many people in our ADF that have told storys of being treated with no regard, just as if it was Nazi Germany orders, and not in War time even. and treated as nothing in War time with no respect but for nothing but malice intent because clearly they could get aways with it in spite. that's how it runs when Sodomites are up in top possitions. They are insane !

Political Correctness in the ADF is the highest order, It is totaly idolised as a god !
In WW2 Australia ADF did not have Political Correctness at all !
Nazi Germany had Political Correctness in fact ! so did Communist Russia in fact !
The UK was not Political Correctness but typical Pommy Lord Ship Toffs of the era.

A mate of mine a Major pointed out to above him a issue that was unlawfull in fact and was given such as total Nazi treatment from above for calling the fact out ! The Major won his case, he had to take the malice bastard to Court ! but still the ADF were rotten to the core and this bastard should of been exposed by the Media for just how outright under handed he and others were to the Major. They were outright pure Evil !
In Buisness such as they would be rotten to the core outright Criminal conduct ! but the Government's are such total good for nothings so as to let such as that slide ! Outright Mallice ! just let to slide.

Yet the top Dog of the ADF came out undermining all of our SAS, he was totaly full of crap ! and he hounded them all like a total moron ! With total outright lack of respect for the best people in the ADF in fact ! This bloke was a inbreed and a Government picked stooge in fact ! not to mention Queer. Yes he tryed his best to destroy the SAS In the eyes of simple minded people of Australia in fact.

I had morons coming up to me and supporting this Clowns crap and I had to say, Listen bud. you could not even make it into the SAS in fact, just in relation to discipline you would totaly full on fail and that's a fact ! Seriously. let alone anything else, period ! Like really people fall for that crap.

 

[amigo de christo]

Do enlighten me…
“How exactly” do “YOU” “care”?
Talk “about them”?
Talk TO “evangelicals”?
Go to “their” meetings and “shout out
your Objections”?
Brow beat “them” ?

Exposing sin and error is not sin .
Exposing a broad road false love is not sin .
ITS LOVE to correct .
These lil sermons about brow beating and hollering
were invented to actually SILENCE the TRUTH that exposes the sin and evil of those who loved and love thier sin .
IF you think warning folks , reminding folks is wrong
THEN you had been dead set against CHRIST and all the apostels .
This generation had seen his warnings as well as the warnings of the apostels to even the churches
as hate and brow beating . IF ya dont believe me
TRY reading their own letters to the churches and YOU SEE how they approached sin and error within that church .
Paul didnt say THOSE WHO SIN , oh JUDGE NOT we all sinners
HE said REBUKE before all that others may fear .
Pual didnt say LET all who name the name of CHRIST judge not and correct not
HE said let it NOT ONCE be named . HE didnt say OH we all sinners dont judge , just hug and get along .

 

[Taken]

Exposing sin and error is not sin .
Exposing a broad road false love is not sin .
ITS LOVE to correct .
These lil sermons about brow beating and hollering
were invented to actually SILENCE the TRUTH that exposes the sin and evil of those who loved and love thier sin .
IF you think warning folks , reminding folks is wrong
THEN you had been dead set against CHRIST and all the apostels .
This generation had seen his warnings as well as the warnings of the apostels to even the churches
as hate and brow beating . IF ya dont believe me
TRY reading their own letters to the churches and YOU SEE how they approached sin and error within that church .
Paul didnt say THOSE WHO SIN , oh JUDGE NOT we all sinners
HE said REBUKE before all that others may fear .
Pual didnt say LET all who name the name of CHRIST judge not and correct not
HE said let it NOT ONCE be named . HE didnt say OH we all sinners dont judge , just hug and get along .

Didn’t ask what sin is not.
Didn’t ask how to brow beat.
Didn’t ask what Paul didn’t say.
Didn’t ask who is a sinner.

Did ask HOW you “care”…

Guess your answer is:
“don’t judge, just hug and get along”.

Seems though, you first “judge” “by your “correction”…

I speak what I believe.

I believe, speak, promote “as the Spirit of God directs my spirit”

I certainly have disagreements with what some others others believe, speak, promote.

Others can consider, investigate, verify, judge, reject what I believe, speak, promote.
(And vise versa).

Do I CARE IF another, considers, investigates, verifies, judges, rejects what “I” believe, speak, promote ? No.

Each individual has their God given Right and Authority to exercise their own FREEWILL, to Believe, Speak, Promote and verify what they Hear, as THEY choose. (Or not)

Does THAT have ANYTHING to do with, loving, liking, hugging, getting along with another Person? No.

It DOES however Have “Everything to Do….
With Knowing “IF” the other…
IS or IS NOT, “your brethren IN Christ.”

Brethren IN Christ HAVE a unique, spiritual Family Bond of Eternal Life…
(Without Human Blood, Without National origin or Nation of Citizenship, Without a man devised Dominational Church Membership).

Glory to God,
Taken