6 The Eternal, Commander of heavenly armies,
King of Israel, who paid their ransom, has this to say:
Eternal One: I am at the beginning and will be at the end.
There is no God except for Me
Isaiah 44:6 (Voice)
Nathanael: 49 Teacher, You are the One—God’s own Son and Israel’s King.
John 1:49 (Voice)
One of the things I like about the VOICE is that it makes explicit who is talking. Isaiah 44:6 is really all you need to grasp that there is no trinitarian God. John 1:49 clearly differentiates between this one God and his son. Regarding Revelation and the intro to John so many attempt to rely on; as I've said there are 2 beginnings. This vid should make it crystal clear.
And in Isaiah 44, who is the one saying is King of Israel.
In John 1, while it is Nathaniel who said that Jesus is the Son of God, the King of Israel, Jesus did not, in the least bit, in any way, shape, of form, denied that nor refute Nathaniel. To the contrary His response to what Nathaniel said, affirms it.
It’s any one’s right to choose what translation he prefers to read. I too prefer to read the easily understood versions. But I do due diligence to check out on the Greek texts that was translated to have a better view of what is being said.
Having said that, be it in the rendering of the VOICE version, it says the same truth, that Jesus is the King of Israel, and that the King of Israel is YHVH (Yahweh/Jehovah).
<<<Regarding Revelation and the intro to John so many attempt to rely on; as I've said there are 2 beginnings. This vid should make it crystal clear.>>>
What is clear in scriptures is that Jesus declared that He is the first and the last as did YHVH (Yahweh/Jehovah) declared Himself to be. That YHVH is the King of Israel and that Jesus is the King of Israel.
Regarding what’s said in the vid you provided, let me here address the logical fallacy charge portion.
He shows the alleged fallacy, by saying:
Yahweh is called the King of Israel.
David is called the King of Israel.
Therefore, David is Yahweh.
By that, he was trying to show that it is equally a fallacy when one say:
Yahweh is called the King of Israel.
Jesus is called the King of Israel.
Therefore, Jesus is Yahweh.
However, if one considers the scriptures I provided, what they say is more than being called the King of Israel, of Israel whose king was David at one time. What they say is:
Yahweh is the King of Israel.
Jesus is the King of Israel.
Now, being called the King of Israel is not the same as being the King of Israel.
When Nathaniel said of Jesus, that He is the Son of God, the King of Israel, surely he was referring to the promised Messiah who is to come. Nathaniel knew who the Messiah is, that he is the King of Israel, according to scriptures. The King of Israel, not for a time and then no more, but forever.
Now, who is the Israel that Yahweh is the King of? Is it a kingdom of this world or a kingdom that is not of this world? Of course, it refers to a Kingdom that is not of this world. For in this world, those who were kings of Israel were but men. Men who dies and after, are replaced by other men to be kings. But the scriptures (Isaiah 44:6) I referred to speaks of Yahweh as the King. It speaks of the Kingdom of God not the kingdom of men. It is an everlasting kingdom, whose King is everlasting.
Tong
R2471