Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Anyone who wants to trust a Bible commissioned by homosexual royalty With an obvious agenda, I got no problems with that, for what it’s worth. Imo It was a great Bible for it’s time
And the bunnies in the eggs, meh
lol
Have you been persecuted?Anybody that wants to believe every anti-KJV lie and wind up like bbyrd009, you all just go right on ahead because the other part of that lie is that he changed the scripture when all you have to do to prove it is a lie is to see the verses are still in there, condemning homosexuality as an abomination.
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. KJV
Leviticus 20:13If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. KJV
So hardly any proof of King James changing the scripture. The accusations of King James being a homosexual are false but again, you have to research it among all the slander on the internet by going to a site that address the accusations reasonably in proving it is just slander, but you ought to know it is slander just by the fact that the verses condemning homosexuality as an abomination are still in there.
Was King James a Homosexual?
Just believe every lie that comes your way, and you will be sorry when you see Jesus face to face.
To all Christians reading this; look at what anti-KJVonlyism has done to bbyrd009. No wonder he doubts everything scripture now.
Matthew 13:20 But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.
I dare say people are easily offended when they once rely on the KJV and then get offended by all that persecution and fall away as a result, and in more ways than one.
i spose youre right anyway tho :)Reckon a miracle has to come from Him now.
so, i'm not saying that this is fact, and i dont have any proof, ok, but you might at least allow room for your favorite xlation's deficiencies? The KJV was cutting edge when It was issued, and It is still a primary goto for verification; but It has flaws, the flaws are known, the counter-arguments are well established, etc rightThat is one of the hypocritical anti-KJV diatribe that can be said about any modern Bible in English, right? And I am sure they repeat these anti-KJV rhetoric when the KJV is in Chinese too.
i aready menchend Easter rightnot sure why you think over 50 KJV translators split up into 8 groups is not a Biblical way to confirm the translation of the Greek and Hebrew for the KJV.
emphasis mine, and yeh i have read the brochure, honest. Eggs and bunnies, bro; fertility rites. K?Like Easter when passover is also derived from the Chaldean origin and not Hebrew from the Greek. Jewish tradition has the days of the unleavened bread follow the specific day of the Passover. So "pasco" could not be translated as Passover and since that Herod was not a Jew, the only other public ceremony
emphasis mine, and yeh i have read the brochure, honest. Eggs and bunnies, bro; fertility rites. K.Like Easter when passover is also derived from the Chaldean origin and not Hebrew from the Greek. Jewish tradition has the days of the unleavened bread follow the specific day of the Passover. So "pasco" could not be translated as Passover and since that Herod was not a Jew, the only other public ceremony
ha but listen to ourself now; a Hebrew or Greek/Aramaic root xlated through the Kyng's Englyshe, to Chinese?I hadn't realized that the KJV had been translated into Chinese.![]()
"Lord" is an Olde Englyshe title and maybe not the best characterization of the relationship?Just like any other modern English Bible in other languages.
ah well can you Quote any of them?Because he was not called Satan until after his lies.
I came that you might have life, more abundantlyThere is no “other life” for it to be completed in, after all? Unless you mean the one after baptism?
You and your sons will be here with me
"in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened, and you will become like Yah" and see how, from a very broad perspective, what satan said is ezackly what came true. And they did not literally die rightBut the serpent said to the woman: "You certainly will not die!
so, a joke book, like the upcoming or already published dunno "Hebrew" NTChinese/English Bible, King James Version 英王钦定本圣经(中英文对照)
"everybody's here with me;You don't know by what your own cult is called, but you know what your cult stands for...and the "we" group are who, you and ?
well, a reply at least, yeh, so, i replied to the reply, if you wanna reply thenPost # 273 Philip James gave the answer you requested.
So, you plan to live forever and never pass over...ok, then?[/QUOTE][QUOT
You and your sons will be here with me
he said, with oh wait i might agree with that one...which might make it worse lol...brbIt's both within believers and in the heavenly realms.
niceand pay the penalty for mankind’s sins
WordSo it seems that what Jesus was actually saying was the kingdom wasn't far off, but among them, that is, he was bringing it.
And they did not literally die right
as long as it is called 'today'One day, however, the kingdom of God will be quite literally manifest on the earth (Isaiah 35:1),
he said, with...and Jesus Christ will rule a physical kingdom from David’s throne (Isaiah 9:7) with Jerusalem as His capital (Zechariah 8:3).
Have you been persecuted?
i spose youre right anyway tho :)
so, i'm not saying that this is fact, and i dont have any proof, ok, but you might at least allow room for your favorite xlation's deficiencies? The KJV was cutting edge when It was issued, and It is still a primary goto for verification; but It has flaws, the flaws are known, the counter-arguments are well established, etc right
As long as one is relying on a translation/s anyway, which tbh i dont quite get
but i love the KJV; it's "kjv only" ppl that i struggle to understand