Lambano
Well-Known Member
That's gotta be a first....Why are you accusing me of being a pharisee?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's gotta be a first....Why are you accusing me of being a pharisee?
Indeed.That's gotta be a first....
It's just the irony - for two years, you've been a heretic. Now you're a legalist?Indeed.
When you pin these folks down, they snarl and snap like cornered animals. (tooth and claw)
But that's not a first. - LOL
[
Right.It's just the irony - for two years, you've been a heretic. Now you're a legalist?
This shows in the New Testament there's is also graceful 'moral' and 'immoral' justice.Certainly not a support for Jesus allowing for divorce in the case of adultery.
God HATES divorce. Right? Why would Jesus allow it?
You continue to make this supposed biblical claim with no biblical support.This shows in the New Testament there's is also graceful 'moral' and 'immoral' justice.
Therefore, either on the ground of 'fornication' or 'adultery', divorce is allowed, rather than stoning to death the 'guilty'.
You want to go down that road of a Pharisee think you're better than others, don't want to burst your bubbles.You continue to make this supposed biblical claim with no biblical support.
I need you to be the Pharisee here. (prove it)
[
Would calling someone a Pharisee be a first stone?As a believer if am to cast the first stone even 'verbally' on others, am to examine myself first should be without sin.
Readers, how about calling another a 'parrot'?Would calling someone a Pharisee be a first stone?
[
This shows in the New Testament there's is also graceful 'moral' and 'immoral' justice.
Therefore, either on the ground of 'fornication' or 'adultery', divorce is allowed, rather than stoning to death the 'guilty'.
This is based on the husband or men are 'innocent' and 'faithful in marriage', yet such a thing happened to them.
To men who are 'guilty' as well, will themselves undergo punishment for sin, curse and death directly from GOD.
'Guilty' women's punishment are not allowed to 'remarry', rather than do and fall under the ground of 'adultery' with her new man.
There's no such thing as one is punished while the other go scot free, 'guilty' will reap what they sow or harvest what they plant.
Jesus is very clear to men and women, your sins are forgiven, sin no more, and concluded, or something worse shall happen to you.
Even to the men who dragged the adulteress woman to test the verdict of Jesus, only the one without sin are eligible to cast the first stone.
As a believer if am to cast the first stone even 'verbally' on others, am to examine myself first should be without sin.
Shalom in the name of Jesus Christ
This is an important point….virginity had to be provable, or else she could be accused of not being a virgin for her husband, which was an expectation.….and part of God’s law.The cloth is presented to prove her virginity. That there was no fornication prior to marriage.
Yes.This topic certainly makes for good word study, and the defining of original language, etc. However, to avoid the common pitfalls of language confused by God, it is more important to consider what the words represent.
In other words, the relationships between men and women are merely examples or images given in the parable of our creation--which only come to their full meaning when the man is Christ, and the women is His bride.
Which offences (by example) then are against that greater relationship?
When a man divorces his wife without any cause, and she's been faithful in their marriage, without committing any sexual immorality.You have some holes in your statements.
But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery. Matthew 5:32
Now this goes out to that husband who divorces his wife without a cause, even not on the ground sexual immorality.And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.” Matthew 19:9
Christ came to the Jews first and addressed to them first, and His disciples were in discipleship to these all of the Kingdom of GOD.These are probably some the most misunderstood verses in the Bible. Christian beliefs have been built on this discussion about divorce and they should not have been….because….. Christ was talking to Jews. And we do not know how many wives the Jews had. So not being able to marry again did not mean they did not have a wife or wives.
Women were under the guardian of the leaders, women folks, family and husbandsAt this point in time women were the propterty of their fathers and then their husbands.
Also fornication is sexual immorality.Sexual immorality would include adultery….adultery during this period was not only a sin but a property crime….punishable by death or divorce. The Mosaic Law did not allow for forgiveness. The wormb was for one man and his heirs.
The Law is Spiritual, and GOD have directly dealt with Israelite men in the Old.You said----To men who are 'guilty' as well, will themselves undergo punishment for sin, curse and death directly from GOD. The Mosaic Law does not address unfaithful men unless they were unfaithful with another man's wife. For one they could have multiple wives….The scriptures never puts an end to polygamy or concubinage.
The legislation is strict and not easy to swallow, but Jesus said that's what GOD intended from the beginning.Even His disciple objected to what Yeshua said about divorce.
Adultery is mentioned in the Roman Gentile Church as well, as how Jesus dealt with the Jews first.The process of divorce is a Jewish process that does not appear outside of the Gospels….Jewish-Christians only.
For the Gentile-Christians the word divorce does not occur after the Gospels….This is what the Apostle Paul said about separation…
For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage. Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress. Romans 7:2-3
It is the same but in other words, send away is she's going back to her family, and put away is she's no longer wanted.To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord): the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife. 1st Corinthians 7:10-11 The word divorce does not appear in the scriptures….the word means---send away or put away.
Jesus is the Master of the Gospel, and the thirteen are 'vessels' or 'instruments' of His, who added furthermore according to the wisdom given to them.No biblical death sentence for a Christian woman that commits adultery, but as history goes on a few were burnt at the stake for adultery.
When a man divorces his wife without any cause, and she's been faithful in their marriage, without committing any sexual immorality.
And, he marry another, probably young or for any other reasons, makes his former wife commit adultery.
Due to unfairness and her dissatisfaction over her husband, she might marry another man, and that makes her commit adultery.
Hence the context is, the man who marries her, himself also commits adultery on the other hand.
The wife can be a newly wed or been wed for some time, but somehow the husband seem to be not happy with her.
This is probably due to arrange marriage or been caught fornicating together and forced marriage, or many other reasons while living together.
Jesus permits divorce only on the ground of sexual immorality, probably a newly wed wife been found not virgin, have committed fornication before marriage.
Or in other case, during one husband's absence, the wife committed sexual immorality with another man committing adultery.
Now this goes out to that husband who divorces his wife without a cause, even not on the ground sexual immorality.
And proceeds to marry another freely, henceforth himself commits adultery as well.
Christ came to the Jews first and addressed to them first, and His disciples were in discipleship to these all of the Kingdom of GOD.
And before Christ's ascension, He commissioned them disciples to likewise make disciple of all nation, kindred and tongue.
All nation consisting of scattered Jews and Gentiles, and for the record, Gentile men too divorce and marry many wives without a cause.
Women were under the guardian of the leaders, women folks, family and husbands
Also fornication is sexual immorality.
Mosaic Law is GOD's justice in the Old Testament, so is dealt with then and there, so that the community and the land will not be defiled.
The Law is Spiritual, and GOD have directly dealt with Israelite men in the Old.
For one, king David and many more, also the Hebrews committed sexual immorality during Moses absence with GOD on Mont Sinai.
The legislation is strict and not easy to swallow, but Jesus said that's what GOD intended from the beginning.
Adultery is mentioned in the Roman Gentile Church as well, as how Jesus dealt with the Jews first.
It is the same but in other words, send away is she's going back to her family, and put away is she's no longer wanted.
Jesus is the Master of the Gospel, and the thirteen are 'vessels' or 'instruments' of His, who added furthermore according to the wisdom given to them.
When the Master permits divorce only on the grounds of sexual immorality, fornication or adultery in the Gospel, who are we?
But rather He prefers, if couples are able to reconcile and carry on their marriage without divorce, would be a plus point.
Isn't that love the greatest compared to faith and hope?
Shalom in the name of Jesus Christ
No, This is incorrect. The word used in Matt 19:9 is porneia in the Greek.The position of the church and society at large is mistaken as to what Jesus was quoted as saying in the gospels. IMHO
Let's discuss.
Questions:
1) What did Jesus actually say?
2) Why did he say it?
3) If we got this wrong, where do we go from here?
The position of the church and society at large is that adultery (sexual immorality) is grounds for divorce.
And they will quote Jesus as an authority on this. But is Jesus being misquoted? Yes, I believe so.
The biggest problem is the disconnect we have with the culture that Jesus was speaking to.
The church teaches that the only grounds for divorce is adultery. (sexual immorality)
But that is not what Jesus actually said.
The basis for this teaching is found in Matthew 19:9
See the NIV translation below, taking note of verse 10 as well as verse 9. (at the very bottom of this post)
Then compare the KJV below that. Note the use of the word "fornication" which matches the NT Greek.
This makes a HUGE difference, especially when considering the cultural setting of the Israelites under the law.
Jesus was saying that the only grounds for divorce is fornication, which is sexual intercourse before marriage. (not after)
What does this mean? Both in the historical context and to the misinterpretation assigned by the church today. ???
For the Israelites, a bride's parents presented her as a virgin to her husband-to-be. The law of Moses made a provision for this.
If the husband-to-be discovered that he had been given a bride that was not a virgin, he could divorce her. (for fornication)
Unfortunately, some new husbands were making false claims in order to divorce their new brides. The fornication loophole.
Parents were allowed to challenge this claim if it was false. See Deuteronomy 22:16-18
Therefore, the KJV translation is correct and the church got it wrong.
Jesus said there is no grounds for divorce except for fornication. Now read verse 10 again.
Better not to marry? Indeed. Not if you have ANY plans to divorce.
Matthew 19:8-10 NIV
Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning.
9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”
10 The disciples said to him, “If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry.”
--- COMPARE ---
Matthew 19:8-10 KJV
He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives:
but from the beginning it was not so.
9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication,
and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
/
Let's stick to 'sexual immorality', and the opposite 'sexual morality', according to the kingdom of GOD.Give me a little more to understand your point.
Fornication is not a biblical word and can be very misleading. That is why whether you are teaching or learning it is best to know and use the words that are actually in the Bible. But even that can be difficult.....the resource material can be just as misleading because a lot of it has a direct connection to the King James Version of the Bible and so inherits all of its errors. It all depends on how serious you are about teaching the truth or knowing the truth.
So you are claiming that Jesus approved of divorce?No, This is incorrect. The word used in Matt 19:9 is porneia in the Greek.
It includes sexual immorality, fornication, marital unfaithfulness, prostitution, adultery, a generic term for sexual sin of any kind.