Your point about the lack of evidence for the existence of God is a common stance taken by many agnostics or skeptics.
Welcome to CB.
In your experience, what evidence will they accept?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Your point about the lack of evidence for the existence of God is a common stance taken by many agnostics or skeptics.
In accordance with direct experience thought appears and disappears.
Therein, all thought is magical. Even the thought, ‘thinking’.
The evidence they accept is provided only by their own relative grasp of human knowledge and understanding. Of their limited abilities to even understand the world around them; and they do a sad job of that..
Appearance isn’t ‘often’. Appearance is now-only. The thought ‘often’ appears now-only, but implies linear time which is not an actuality and is never actually experienced. The thought (often) is experinced now-only, but what the thought implies does not actually exist.Often. However, the thought you expressed here is preserved in writing and, for some period of time, in the minds of those who are privy to it.
What would you say it is about thought which makes it magical?
Much appreciated, thanks!Welcome to the forum.
I forgot about this thread, since you did not respond to post #246 about the purpose and meaning in life perspective.Morality is not direct evidence of a God if that is what you’re trying to say.
I found this interesting.The funny part is that despite hoping that believers would be right as a form of giving them the benefit of the doubt, I, for the life of me due to my integrity, cannot stoop as far as being intellectually dishonest to the point of saying God is real just because I wish he is. That’s what you do. You wish your God is real so you start with claiming he is instead of having the humility in admitting that you don’t really know. Instead of saying something like, “God -could- be real, here are the reasons why”, you start with saying “Here is why he is real.” That is not how an honest scientist proceeds.
The god they look for, has leavers that he just pulls to fix things out of the blue !
When Jesus was preaching he went to the lost sheep of Israel. They believed in God overall but they weren't following his directions.
Bingo. I address this very point in one of my blog entries:
I went through the public education system until grade 10. Then I went to a private Christian school. Going from one to the other was a very jarring experience.
Generally, the more religious one is, the less educated they are.
Deconstructing is by no means easy, but this lady has done it here after many years of being a Christian:
Critique itself?The thought occurred to me "if Critical thinking doesn't need to lead people to God, maybe critical thinking needs to critique itself"