What documents and why destroyed the US Embassy in Kiev during the move (strana-today.translate.goog)
Another bit of news the US media will never print
On the eve of the "invasion" announced by the United States, but never took place, the American embassy in Kyiv was closed and documents were destroyed. Photo: RIA Novosti
One possible explanation for the sudden and hasty relocation of the US Embassy from Kiev to Lviv, with the destruction of documents and servers, could be an attempt to cover its tracks in the case of interference in the 2016 elections on the side of Hillary Clinton.
This version is increasingly discussed in expert circles.
The United States closed its embassy in Kiev amid "threats of Russian invasion of Ukraine" by decree of Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
The destruction of the documents was discussed in a Feb. 12 phone call between Under Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian McKeon and House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Gregory Meeks, Hill reported.
What is behind this, the "Country" understood.
The Bidens and invasion herald Sullivan
During the move, the embassy staff destroyed some of the files, among which, according to the official version, were applications for green cards and raw passport documents, explaining this by the protocol for the protection of confidential information (by other owls, so as not to fall into the hands of "enemies").
Also, according to the Wall Street Journal, diplomats were ordered to destroy network equipment and computer workstations, as well as dismantle the telephone system of the embassy.
Details in the State Department classified. State Department spokesman Ned Price at the briefing said he could not provide details about the destruction of documents at the US embassy in Kyiv, but said no valid passports were destroyed.
"There is a standard set of procedures that we run when we start downsizing an embassy," Price said. "We've taken reasonable precautions when it comes to sensitive documents and sensitive equipment, but we just can't provide details."
There is an opinion that behind the destruction of the document is actually the toxic history of the Biden family's relationship with the Ukrainian elite.
We are talking about compromising evidence related to the work of Biden's son, Hunter, who received 50 thousand dollars a month in a Ukrainian oil company under the protection of his father. As well as accusations that the Ukrainian authorities, on the orders of the then White House administration, interfered in the American elections on the side of Hillary Clinton, helping her fight Trump.
“Sooner rather than later, the Trump team and other Republicans will achieve an investigation. And here, by a happy coincidence, all the archives burned down. Let’s not forget that in 1917 the file of the criminal investigation department was burned first. Lvov himself ordered the destruction of network equipment and computers in the embassy," international journalist Nadezhda Sass writes on her Facebook.
According to Andrew Stattaford, editor of the National Review magazine, the transfer of the embassy to Lviv, and especially the destruction of documents and dismantling of equipment, looked like an act of surrender.
"The US response to the Ukraine crisis is reminiscent of the fiasco in Kabul," Stattaford tells us.
In the destruction of classified materials, according to Andriy Telizhenko, a former employee of the Ukrainian embassy in the United States, in addition to the Bidens and the top echelons of the Democratic Party, high-ranking American officials may also be interested (compromising evidence on which can hit their bosses).
"For example, Mr. Jake Sullivan (Obama and the Clintons man, now Biden's national security adviser - herald of the invasion, who speaks loudest of all about "Putin's attack this week," - Red.). As the investigation found, he lied in his testimony about Russiagate in 2018-2019. It turned out that he ordered materials against Trump during the 2016 election campaign, when he worked in the Clinton campaign. It is possible that not only the Bidens are interested in destroying certain documents in Ukraine, but also senior officials who could organize coordination with the exit of the diplomatic mission in order to clear up traces of their affairs. When Sullivan began commenting on the invasion, it was reported that he was involved in the anti-Trump campaign. And what he said before, under oath, was a lie. Another possible stakeholder is the Clintons, who hired a Trump spying campaign to come up with a story about his ties to Russia's Alfa Bank. And many things within the framework of this campaign came from Ukraine,"
Indeed, Fox News, citing sources, writes that Jake Sullivan is mentioned in the investigation into the circumstances of surveillance of the Trump campaign in 2016.
Previously investigating U.S. Special Counsel John Durham charged perjury against Democratic lawyer Michael Sussman, who in 2016 provided the FBI with information about an alleged "secret communication channel" between Trump's Trump Organization and a Russian bank. The lawyer hid that he acted in the interests of the Clinton headquarters, as well as a certain company.
Sullivan is listed in the indictment as a "foreign policy adviser." According to the channel, the document indicates that a Clinton campaign lawyer discussed the information provided by Sussman "with her campaign manager, director of communications and foreign policy adviser."
Fox News notes that Sullivan's mention in the indictment demonstrates the Durham investigation's "shortest connection to the Joe Biden administration to date."
American political scientist Dmitry Drobnitsky also speaks about the "Sullivan factor" and compromising evidence on him, who published a caricature of the scandalous Biden adviser and Secretary of State Blinken: "The more compromising evidence on Sullivan, the worse it is with de-escalation."
“When signs of de-escalation appeared and Biden’s speech about Ukraine was being prepared, publications appeared about illegal wiretapping of Trump. It turned out that he was listened to both during the election campaign and when he already became president. And that Sullivan was directly involved in this. , show videos, as he said that "the Russians have definitely hacked into the electoral system and are leading Trump to the presidency." The war of compromising evidence in the United States is immediately reflected on the international agenda. ", perhaps, one of the most dangerous and previously unseen phenomena in geopolitics. For example, when there was a Watergate in 1972-1974 against Nixon, it was calm on the outer contour," Drobnitsky said in the Now program.
Hacker attacks from Ukraine
They could also destroy documents and servers related to the possible interference of the Democratic Party in the US elections on the side of Clinton in 2016 - with the help of Ukraine.
Trump mentioned them during a scandalous telephone conversation with Zelensky, who almost brought the ex-president to impeachment. According to his entourage, Ukrainians, not Russians, were behind the hacker attack on the servers of the Democratic Party.
"Crowdstrike says (a company in the Us that specializes in countering cyber attacks - Ed.) ... It's about one of your rich people. The server, as they say, is in Ukraine," Trump said.
Crowdstrike is a company that helped investigate the penetration of hackers into the networks of the US National Democratic Committee in the last presidential election, from where the information was leaked to WikiLeaks. We are talking about Clinton's secret e-mail correspondence, the publication of which shook her rating.
In November 2018, Reuters wrote that hackers from the Cozy Bear group, which is associated with Russian special services, sent phishing letters to US officials, hiding behind the names of representatives of the US State Department. Information about this was shared with the agency by representatives of CrowdStrike and FireEye Inc., specializing in cybersecurity.
"There is a version that hacker servers are actually not in Russia, but in Ukraine, from friends of the Democratic Party. And that the Democrats themselves staged the hack in order to thus compromise Trump in alleged collision with Russia, as well as to justify the loss of the election. Democrats, of course, deny everything," Peter Stone, a Political Expert from Washington, told Strana.
This version was indirectly previously promoted by Trump himself.
"Why did the Democratic National Committee refuse to hand over its server to the FBI? This is a big scam of the Democrats and the justification for losing the election!" wrote Trump on Twitter in June 2017.
In turn, Crowdstrike claims that they transferred the servers to the FBI.
"We have provided all forensics and analysis to the FBI," CrowdStrike spokeswoman Ilina Kashiola told the New York Times.
Alperovich, a Russian immigrant, founded Crowdstrike in 2011 with George Kurtz (both former McAfee executives), according to Forbes.
Our sources in diplomatic circles say that in addition to the Biden case, they want Trump to investigate cyber attacks on the Democratic Party servers that could come from Ukraine in collusion with the local pro-democracy elite.
Like, the Democrats hoped to kill two birds with one stone - to accuse Russia of interfering, and Trump of conspiring with it.
"Among the destroyed files could also be documents related to hacker attacks," - says the source.
Another bit of news the US media will never print
On the eve of the "invasion" announced by the United States, but never took place, the American embassy in Kyiv was closed and documents were destroyed. Photo: RIA Novosti
One possible explanation for the sudden and hasty relocation of the US Embassy from Kiev to Lviv, with the destruction of documents and servers, could be an attempt to cover its tracks in the case of interference in the 2016 elections on the side of Hillary Clinton.
This version is increasingly discussed in expert circles.
The United States closed its embassy in Kiev amid "threats of Russian invasion of Ukraine" by decree of Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
The destruction of the documents was discussed in a Feb. 12 phone call between Under Secretary of State for Management and Resources Brian McKeon and House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Gregory Meeks, Hill reported.
What is behind this, the "Country" understood.
The Bidens and invasion herald Sullivan
During the move, the embassy staff destroyed some of the files, among which, according to the official version, were applications for green cards and raw passport documents, explaining this by the protocol for the protection of confidential information (by other owls, so as not to fall into the hands of "enemies").
Also, according to the Wall Street Journal, diplomats were ordered to destroy network equipment and computer workstations, as well as dismantle the telephone system of the embassy.
Details in the State Department classified. State Department spokesman Ned Price at the briefing said he could not provide details about the destruction of documents at the US embassy in Kyiv, but said no valid passports were destroyed.
"There is a standard set of procedures that we run when we start downsizing an embassy," Price said. "We've taken reasonable precautions when it comes to sensitive documents and sensitive equipment, but we just can't provide details."
There is an opinion that behind the destruction of the document is actually the toxic history of the Biden family's relationship with the Ukrainian elite.
We are talking about compromising evidence related to the work of Biden's son, Hunter, who received 50 thousand dollars a month in a Ukrainian oil company under the protection of his father. As well as accusations that the Ukrainian authorities, on the orders of the then White House administration, interfered in the American elections on the side of Hillary Clinton, helping her fight Trump.
“Sooner rather than later, the Trump team and other Republicans will achieve an investigation. And here, by a happy coincidence, all the archives burned down. Let’s not forget that in 1917 the file of the criminal investigation department was burned first. Lvov himself ordered the destruction of network equipment and computers in the embassy," international journalist Nadezhda Sass writes on her Facebook.
According to Andrew Stattaford, editor of the National Review magazine, the transfer of the embassy to Lviv, and especially the destruction of documents and dismantling of equipment, looked like an act of surrender.
"The US response to the Ukraine crisis is reminiscent of the fiasco in Kabul," Stattaford tells us.
In the destruction of classified materials, according to Andriy Telizhenko, a former employee of the Ukrainian embassy in the United States, in addition to the Bidens and the top echelons of the Democratic Party, high-ranking American officials may also be interested (compromising evidence on which can hit their bosses).
"For example, Mr. Jake Sullivan (Obama and the Clintons man, now Biden's national security adviser - herald of the invasion, who speaks loudest of all about "Putin's attack this week," - Red.). As the investigation found, he lied in his testimony about Russiagate in 2018-2019. It turned out that he ordered materials against Trump during the 2016 election campaign, when he worked in the Clinton campaign. It is possible that not only the Bidens are interested in destroying certain documents in Ukraine, but also senior officials who could organize coordination with the exit of the diplomatic mission in order to clear up traces of their affairs. When Sullivan began commenting on the invasion, it was reported that he was involved in the anti-Trump campaign. And what he said before, under oath, was a lie. Another possible stakeholder is the Clintons, who hired a Trump spying campaign to come up with a story about his ties to Russia's Alfa Bank. And many things within the framework of this campaign came from Ukraine,"
Indeed, Fox News, citing sources, writes that Jake Sullivan is mentioned in the investigation into the circumstances of surveillance of the Trump campaign in 2016.
Previously investigating U.S. Special Counsel John Durham charged perjury against Democratic lawyer Michael Sussman, who in 2016 provided the FBI with information about an alleged "secret communication channel" between Trump's Trump Organization and a Russian bank. The lawyer hid that he acted in the interests of the Clinton headquarters, as well as a certain company.
Sullivan is listed in the indictment as a "foreign policy adviser." According to the channel, the document indicates that a Clinton campaign lawyer discussed the information provided by Sussman "with her campaign manager, director of communications and foreign policy adviser."
Fox News notes that Sullivan's mention in the indictment demonstrates the Durham investigation's "shortest connection to the Joe Biden administration to date."
American political scientist Dmitry Drobnitsky also speaks about the "Sullivan factor" and compromising evidence on him, who published a caricature of the scandalous Biden adviser and Secretary of State Blinken: "The more compromising evidence on Sullivan, the worse it is with de-escalation."
“When signs of de-escalation appeared and Biden’s speech about Ukraine was being prepared, publications appeared about illegal wiretapping of Trump. It turned out that he was listened to both during the election campaign and when he already became president. And that Sullivan was directly involved in this. , show videos, as he said that "the Russians have definitely hacked into the electoral system and are leading Trump to the presidency." The war of compromising evidence in the United States is immediately reflected on the international agenda. ", perhaps, one of the most dangerous and previously unseen phenomena in geopolitics. For example, when there was a Watergate in 1972-1974 against Nixon, it was calm on the outer contour," Drobnitsky said in the Now program.
Hacker attacks from Ukraine
They could also destroy documents and servers related to the possible interference of the Democratic Party in the US elections on the side of Clinton in 2016 - with the help of Ukraine.
Trump mentioned them during a scandalous telephone conversation with Zelensky, who almost brought the ex-president to impeachment. According to his entourage, Ukrainians, not Russians, were behind the hacker attack on the servers of the Democratic Party.
"Crowdstrike says (a company in the Us that specializes in countering cyber attacks - Ed.) ... It's about one of your rich people. The server, as they say, is in Ukraine," Trump said.
Crowdstrike is a company that helped investigate the penetration of hackers into the networks of the US National Democratic Committee in the last presidential election, from where the information was leaked to WikiLeaks. We are talking about Clinton's secret e-mail correspondence, the publication of which shook her rating.
In November 2018, Reuters wrote that hackers from the Cozy Bear group, which is associated with Russian special services, sent phishing letters to US officials, hiding behind the names of representatives of the US State Department. Information about this was shared with the agency by representatives of CrowdStrike and FireEye Inc., specializing in cybersecurity.
"There is a version that hacker servers are actually not in Russia, but in Ukraine, from friends of the Democratic Party. And that the Democrats themselves staged the hack in order to thus compromise Trump in alleged collision with Russia, as well as to justify the loss of the election. Democrats, of course, deny everything," Peter Stone, a Political Expert from Washington, told Strana.
This version was indirectly previously promoted by Trump himself.
"Why did the Democratic National Committee refuse to hand over its server to the FBI? This is a big scam of the Democrats and the justification for losing the election!" wrote Trump on Twitter in June 2017.
In turn, Crowdstrike claims that they transferred the servers to the FBI.
"We have provided all forensics and analysis to the FBI," CrowdStrike spokeswoman Ilina Kashiola told the New York Times.
Alperovich, a Russian immigrant, founded Crowdstrike in 2011 with George Kurtz (both former McAfee executives), according to Forbes.
Our sources in diplomatic circles say that in addition to the Biden case, they want Trump to investigate cyber attacks on the Democratic Party servers that could come from Ukraine in collusion with the local pro-democracy elite.
Like, the Democrats hoped to kill two birds with one stone - to accuse Russia of interfering, and Trump of conspiring with it.
"Among the destroyed files could also be documents related to hacker attacks," - says the source.
