jaybird
Well-Known Member
- Feb 29, 2016
- 1,595
- 560
- 113
The He was in italics (which means it is not included in the original manuscripts); but even if it stands as being valid, it is explained by John 8:27 who the "He" is that Jesus is speaking of.
makes no difference if the "he" is in italics, the phrase is understood as i am him, he, the one, someone etc. we know this because when hearing this the Jews asked "who are you?", or in other words, who is "he"?
and in John 10 you have Jesus and the Jews having this exact same conversation again, this time they want to stone Him for His claims but this time Jesus says who He is claiming to be, the "Son of" the Most High, not the Most High.
"son of" the Most High is not the Most High, the Most High is not anyone's son, that is why He is called "Most High".
Last edited: