2nd Temple Judaism and Complexity of the Godhead

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This thread is a continuation of another I did on Christian Forums dot come over 2 years ago (History of the Trinity) but I'm going to try for it to be more focused. One of the big break throughs that has come about in recent times is our understanding of Second Temple Judaism. So what I'm going to do is focus more on the areas of Judaism from that era that lend itself to what we understand as Nicene Theology of the bishops that eventually formulate the Nicene Creed. Lots of people incorrectly believe that the Trinitarianism is a pagan corruption, and it is such a touchy subject that it is officially banned here (so no Trinitarian debates allowed for folks that want to argue against it).


My basic thesis for this thread is that there was already a basic Trinitarian Phronema (mindset) coming out of 2nd Temple Judaism. This official theology is called "Two Powers In Heaven" in various books, lecturers written by scholars. In Recent times Biblical scholar Michael Heiser was one of the big people talking about this topic.


Besides the "Two Powers in Heaven" theology of 2nd Temple Judaism there is another bullet point coming from the Aramaic language. By the time of Jesus, the common people had lost a lot of their knowledge of Hebrew. Hebrew by that time had largely become a dead language, and used as an official "Holy Language" in the same way that we have Churches use Latin, ancient Greek, Coptic, Armenian, Syriac and Slavonic today. What is however interesting in 2nd Temple Judaism are Aramaic translations of the Old Testament texts. In the Targums, we have a concept Memra that is very similar (seemingly identical to the Greek Logos), and has a lot of theological significance for describing things like Divine appearances and manifestations (Theophanies, Parousia's etc.).


I will end this basic setup, post by mentioning a basic point mentioned by Author Fr. Steven Deyoung in his book, "Religion of the Apostles". Much of our understanding of theology has been shaped by previous centuries and the development of "Monotheism". Unfortunately, much of the discussions on theology has been influenced by what Deyoung calls "Hard Monotheism". This the kind of monotheism that we have coming out Talmudic Judaism (a theology made purely for the purposes of rejecting Christian doctrine), as well as the rise of Islam. This is the kind of "monotheism" that rejects all forms of Scriptural nuance or complexity for the purposes of pure simply absolutism. That however is not the monotheism that existed in earlier Judaism. The Early Judaism believed God was One but began to recognize and take note that there was some really weird stuff going on in some of the scriptures and Old Testament events and begin to take notice of them and ponder the significance of them. Rather than thinking in terms of "Monotheism" vs. "Polytheism" the ancient Jews thought more in terms of "Their true Faith of Yahweh" vs. "the religions of the pagan heathens surrounding them". It basically allowed for more mystery than Talmudic Judaism where all the weird stuff we will talk about in scripture simply gets dismissed as idiom, hyperbole etc. And of course, I found it interesting learning that the term "monotheism" itself is more of a Post Reformation construct than something the ancients talked about.

OK hopefully that gives you a good overview. I will be hopefully laying out an introduction of why the 2nd Temple Rabbis began talking about "Two Powers in Heaven" hopefully sometime early Sunday, or later in that day. Tomorrow is Father's day, and my dad's birthday and he is in the hospital (been there the last 2.5 weeks so if I don't post early, I likely won't be posting until later. Thanks for reading!

Pavel
 
Last edited:

Randy Kluth

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2020
8,288
2,605
113
Pacific NW
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This thread is a continuation of another I did on Christian Forums dot come over 2 years ago (History of the Trinity) but I'm going to try for it to be more focused. One of the big break throughs that has come about in recent times is our understanding of Second Temple Judaism. So what I'm going to do is focus more on the areas of Judaism from that era that lend itself to what we understand as Nicene Theology of the bishops that eventually formulate the Nicene Creed. Lots of people incorrectly believe that the Trinitarianism is a pagan corruption, and it is such a touchy subject that it is officially banned here (so no Trinitarian debates allowed for folks that want to argue against it).


My basic thesis for this thread is that there was already a basic Trinitarian Phronema (mindset) coming out of 2nd Temple Judaism. This official theology is called "Two Powers In Heaven" in various books, lecturers written by scholars. In Recent times Biblical scholar Michael Heiser was one of the big people talking about this topic.


Besides the "Two Powers in Heaven" theology of 2nd Temple Judaism there is another bullet point coming from the Aramaic language. By the time of Jesus, the common had lost a lot of their knowledge of Hebrew. Hebrew by that time had largely become a dead language, and used as an official "Holy Language" in the same way that we have Churches use Latin, ancient Greek, Coptic, Armenian, Syriac and Slavonic today. What is however interesting in 2nd Temple Judaism are Aramaic translations of the Old Testament texts. In the Targums, we have a concept Memra that is very similar (seemingly identical to the Greek Logos), and has a lot of theological significance for describing things like Divine appearances and manifestations (Theophanies, Parousia's etc.).


I will end this basic setup, post by mentioning a basic point mentioned by Author Fr. Steven Deyoung in his book, "Religion of the Apostles". Much of our understanding of theology has been shaped by previous centuries and the development of "Monotheism". Unfortunately, much of the discussions on theology has been influenced by what Deyoung calls "Hard Monotheism". This the kind of monotheism that we have coming out Talmudic Judaism (a theology made purely for the purposes of rejecting Christian doctrine), as well as the rise of Islam. This is the kind of "monotheism" that rejects all forms of Scriptural nuance or complexity for the purposes of pure simply absolutism. That however is not the monotheism that existed in earlier Judaism. The Early Judaism believed God was One but began to recognize and take note that there was some really weird stuff going on in some of the scriptures and Old Testament events and begin to take notice of them and ponder the significance of them. Rather than thinking in terms of "Monotheism" vs. "Polytheism" the ancient Jews thought more in terms of "Their true Faith of Yahweh" vs. "the religions of the pagan heathens surrounding them". It basically allowed for more mystery than Talmudic Judaism where all the weird stuff we will talk about in scripture simply gets dismissed as idiom, hyperbole etc. And of course, I found it interesting learning that the term "monotheism" itself is more of a Post Reformation construct than something the ancients talked about.

OK hopefully that gives you a good overview. I will be hopefully laying out an introduction of why the 2nd Temple Rabbis began talking about "Two Powers in Heaven" hopefully sometime early Sunday, or later in that day. Tomorrow is Father's day, and my dad's birthday and he is in the hospital (been there the last 2.5 weeks so if I don't post early, I likely won't be posting until later. Thanks for reading!

Pavel
Found that interesting. It would seem weird if the Israelites were so settled on God's unity with a God who is utterly transcendent. They could neither claim to know everything about Him nor know what His "unity" consisted of.

The "word of God" itself suggests that God controls the revelations of who He is. So we are utterly dependent upon God Himself to reveal to us who He is and how His unity should be expressed.

The expression of a "hard monotheism," therefore, does sound a bit "defensive," as opposed to strictly interpreting the Bible. I wouldn't be surprised if ancient Judaism allowed for a greater display of liberty in matters pertaining to God's "unity."

The royal "we" or "let us" may be indicative of more than a simple convenience of expression. It may indicate an actual plurality of divine personal expression. But I don't know--I have no language expertise.

So you have my interest!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Mosko

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Found that interesting. It would seem weird if the Israelites were so settled on God's unity with a God who is utterly transcendent. They could neither claim to know everything about Him nor know what His "unity" consisted of.

The "word of God" itself suggests that God controls the revelations of who He is. So we are utterly dependent upon God Himself to reveal to us who He is and how His unity should be expressed.

The expression of a "hard monotheism," therefore, does sound a bit "defensive," as opposed to strictly interpreting the Bible. I wouldn't be surprised if ancient Judaism allowed for a greater display of liberty in matters pertaining to God's "unity."

The royal "we" or "let us" may be indicative of more than a simple convenience of expression. It may indicate an actual plurality of divine personal expression. But I don't know--I have no language expertise.

So you have my interest!

The expression of hard monotheism is not really defensive when you see the activities of traditional Jews against Christian teaching. I would point especially to Tovia Singer especially on YouTube. Judaism in the aftermath of the Talmud has really gone out of it's way to be bury the theology of the older era, stigmatize it, deny it and more or less rationalize away all the strange stuff in the scriptures. If you can stomach a person getting intermittently rebuked and chided for a hour and half stretch of time, I would recommend this video, where Sam Shamoun more or less proves the Trinity from the Old Testament alone to a young Orthodox Jew (He is sharply taken to task for aiding and abetting the Muslim Evangelists at "Speakers Corner" website (A website for the Muslims that preach at "Speakers Corner" in London). That video is a little bit of a spoiler for future content of the thread for folks that want to watch it, but since most won't I'm probably pretty safe here. :)


 

RedFan

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2022
2,871
1,257
113
70
New Hampshire
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Good post! I see similar thought in Philo, whose Logos is laced with a kind of independence from God, separately personified, what he calls at one point a "second" God with attributes of creativity, Wisdom, revelation, etc. -- largely as a way to maintain the transcendence of God, through what we might call "mediation." (One can see something similar in the philosophy of Plotinus.) A lot of ink has been spilled on affinity between Philo and John's Prologue, but not much on affinity of the Memra of the Targums and John.

We should explore this further.
 

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I figured I should include this, something I blogged on Facebook a long time ago, maybe 2017-2019.


Elohim and the Trinity
The Genesis opening and first few verses of the chapter are the first "proof texts" or bullet point when it comes to what would become what we know as "the doctrine of the Trinity" in Nicene Christianity. I will get more into this in the next post. But something should be said about the word chosen for "God" in the Hebrew. The word for God in this text is Elohim, and that is a word that uses a plural form, and for any Christian we would see the obvious significance of this because we know God as being one in three persons as the Nicene formula speaks of.


Of course, if you take Hebrew in Seminary, there is a good chance you will be warned off from seeing that as sufficient proof in itself. Because you do have things like "plurals of majesty", in both the ancient and modern world. Probably the best example of a plural of majesty that we know of is the English monarch speaking of himself or herself as "We". This is done because the monarch speaks for more than just himself or herself, but for the entire United Kingdom. And so, this also can be said to potentially be some of the reason for the plural form of God in this passage. God is a King who is seated in the midst of "His heavenly court" the angels.

Now, certain unbelieving modern Biblical scholars like to give the explanation where they see this as being a kind of artifact of language, namely that the word was lifted from an earlier polytheistic culture, and they will even try to assert that monotheism evolved so to speak from one of these societies. But of course, believing scholars like Michael Heiser have a good response to this. Namely that God uses the language, tropes, figurers of speech, and iconography etc. of the ancient world, to communicate to his message and covenant to his ancient people in various ways they could comprehend (in some ways a little like Jesus using the parables, or Paul at Mars Hill relating his message to the Greeks and their altar of the "unknown god").
May be an image of ‎text that says '‎אלהים‎'‎
 

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"Two Powers in Heaven" theology


My synopsis

In Second Temple Judaism BC 500 to AD 70 many rabbis and other people who studied the scriptures began to notice weird things going on in the Old Testament, especially with "the Angel of the Lord". The Angel of the Lord does not act like a normal, generic messenger angel, but really acts or is depicted more like a god or God....

What do I mean by this? Well you find the angel of the Lord doing things like receiving prayer, worship, having the name of the Lord "in Him", "being referred to as a God" by God. He has the power to forgive or not forgive transgressions and so on.


Anyway, the basic idea of Two Powers in Heaven is that heaven is ruled much like an Ancient kingdom. It was common to have a ruler/regent with a vice regent. This is basically the same as the ruler and their chancellor that we see in later times like medieval ages. In the Bible, the best example is Pharaoh in Genesis making Joseph governor of Egypt.

This idea also in general fits into another big idea, namely the Divine Counsel, The notion of God as an enthroned King surrounded by his heavenly court (the angels).



Two Powers In Heaven.jpg
 

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
(Responding to another poster on another board, who thought "The angel of the Lord was just an arch angel of special anger)

From what I can tell, Angel of the Lord in general describes a theophany. The only passage I sort of had some doubts on was this passage.

The Fall of Jericho
13 Now when Joshua was near Jericho, he looked up and saw a man standing in front of him with a drawn sword in his hand. Joshua went up to him and asked, “Are you for us or for our enemies?”

14 “Neither,” he replied, “but as commander of the army of the Lord I have now come.” Then Joshua fell facedown to the ground in reverence, and asked him, “What message does my Lord have for his servant?”

15 The commander of the Lord’s army replied, “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy.” And Joshua did so.


I think I assumed for a long time this was arch angel Michael who was unnamed for some reason. But after reading up on this stuff, and looking at the context etc. I think this is probably a theophany, but this is one passage not usually spoken of as far as theophany's. But this passage kind was my best attempt to find an exception to the rule of thumb that the angel of the Lord term is something else like just an idiom of an angel that is working for the Lord.


I will make a summary and analysis of some notable accounts from Genesis and Exodus in future posts on (most likely Monday Morning).

scratch that I found a Vintage Michael Heiser video. He looks 10-20 years younger than in the YouTube videos of his lecturers that I usually watch and looks geared towards newcomers.

 
Last edited:

Nancy

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Apr 30, 2018
17,425
26,714
113
Buffalo, Ny
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This thread is a continuation of another I did on Christian Forums dot come over 2 years ago (History of the Trinity) but I'm going to try for it to be more focused. One of the big break throughs that has come about in recent times is our understanding of Second Temple Judaism. So what I'm going to do is focus more on the areas of Judaism from that era that lend itself to what we understand as Nicene Theology of the bishops that eventually formulate the Nicene Creed. Lots of people incorrectly believe that the Trinitarianism is a pagan corruption, and it is such a touchy subject that it is officially banned here (so no Trinitarian debates allowed for folks that want to argue against it).


My basic thesis for this thread is that there was already a basic Trinitarian Phronema (mindset) coming out of 2nd Temple Judaism. This official theology is called "Two Powers In Heaven" in various books, lecturers written by scholars. In Recent times Biblical scholar Michael Heiser was one of the big people talking about this topic.


Besides the "Two Powers in Heaven" theology of 2nd Temple Judaism there is another bullet point coming from the Aramaic language. By the time of Jesus, the common people had lost a lot of their knowledge of Hebrew. Hebrew by that time had largely become a dead language, and used as an official "Holy Language" in the same way that we have Churches use Latin, ancient Greek, Coptic, Armenian, Syriac and Slavonic today. What is however interesting in 2nd Temple Judaism are Aramaic translations of the Old Testament texts. In the Targums, we have a concept Memra that is very similar (seemingly identical to the Greek Logos), and has a lot of theological significance for describing things like Divine appearances and manifestations (Theophanies, Parousia's etc.).


I will end this basic setup, post by mentioning a basic point mentioned by Author Fr. Steven Deyoung in his book, "Religion of the Apostles". Much of our understanding of theology has been shaped by previous centuries and the development of "Monotheism". Unfortunately, much of the discussions on theology has been influenced by what Deyoung calls "Hard Monotheism". This the kind of monotheism that we have coming out Talmudic Judaism (a theology made purely for the purposes of rejecting Christian doctrine), as well as the rise of Islam. This is the kind of "monotheism" that rejects all forms of Scriptural nuance or complexity for the purposes of pure simply absolutism. That however is not the monotheism that existed in earlier Judaism. The Early Judaism believed God was One but began to recognize and take note that there was some really weird stuff going on in some of the scriptures and Old Testament events and begin to take notice of them and ponder the significance of them. Rather than thinking in terms of "Monotheism" vs. "Polytheism" the ancient Jews thought more in terms of "Their true Faith of Yahweh" vs. "the religions of the pagan heathens surrounding them". It basically allowed for more mystery than Talmudic Judaism where all the weird stuff we will talk about in scripture simply gets dismissed as idiom, hyperbole etc. And of course, I found it interesting learning that the term "monotheism" itself is more of a Post Reformation construct than something the ancients talked about.

OK hopefully that gives you a good overview. I will be hopefully laying out an introduction of why the 2nd Temple Rabbis began talking about "Two Powers in Heaven" hopefully sometime early Sunday, or later in that day. Tomorrow is Father's day, and my dad's birthday and he is in the hospital (been there the last 2.5 weeks so if I don't post early, I likely won't be posting until later. Thanks for reading!

Pavel
@Pavel Mosko
Good morning and just to warn you, we still are not allowed to speak on the "Trinity". When the Admins decide to allow it again, we will let everyone know so, this is just a verbal warning.
Have a great day.
 

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
OK @Nancey


I guess folks who are interested in this topic may need to email me, or maybe follow me on another platform like Facebook, Youtube etc. Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy

AW Bowman

Active Member
Jun 7, 2022
179
146
43
86
East Texas
hatalmidim.boards.net
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Forum Observations

I have been a member of this forum for two years, but not very active. Yet, I have perused through many threats and have made several observations. The following is a list of what I have found in my time in this community, Now, please do not take anything I've posted here personally. I have not pointed any fingers! Perhaps it is because I am guilty, myself.

1. We seem to seek answers to who/what God is, i.e., trying to figure out God. This approach is common to most Western thinking people, our worldview. However, the worldview of the biblical authors is slightly different. The Hebraic worldview of 2000 plus years ago was as follows: what must we do to please God, not to figure him out, but to accept that He exists, and we are to worship Him. Both approaches have extremely good positional points of view as well as significant errors. The results of these errors are man's attempt to help God out. That is, to scriptural instructions we add our own rules, instructions, commandments, statutes, and laws, even to adding our own interpretations of what we think the scripters should be saying. The results: According to a PEW report made during the late 1990's that there were over 40,000 different Christian claiming denominations in the world. This number does not include nondenominational churches, home churches, or individual Christians that do not attend church (for whatever reason). Conclusion: there is no real unity within the body of Christ.

2. As a group we often play right/wrong games. That is, my opinions/understandings I'm right and your positions are wrong. This is a result of number one, above. Unfortunately, we do not have a living Moses or an individual by the name of Jesus Christ physically walking among us today, in the flesh where we can get all our questions and differences resolved. Yet, we have both the written word and the Spirit of Almighty God with us individually and collectivity. The problem: we have few individuals who hear, understand, and do what the Spirit says. The failing is that when God speaks, most of us do not hear the Voice, or we filter what he says through our own personal worldview, and/or we take our own thinking and good ideas as being from God. And we stumble. One result is that even management of this forum has had to list subjects that are forbidden to be discussed – simply to keep the peace. A possible solution: State what you believe and why – a biblical foundation. Then carefully examine the replies to your posts. Where there are differing understandings, evaluate them against the word and the Spirit (not your position). Be willing to take correction when an error in your position is exposed. If arguments against your position are not found to be valid, simply explain why you reject the opposing argument(s) and move on.

3. There is a lack of formal Bible Study. Many read the Bible as if it were a newspaper or a magazine and likewise apply what they read in like manner. This approach is evidenced by the picking and choosing, and taking out of context, Scriptures that appear to support a personal point of view. This does great damage to the word of God. However, I also noticed a good many here who are most excellent in their presentations. Thank you.

The best Bible Study material I have found was compiled by Dr. Bub Utley. His material is free, and most importantly he does not tell, request, or demand that anyone accept everything he presents. Rather, if you find "anything" to be of value to you, take and use that, and leave the rest.

Free Bible Commentaries and Bible Study Tools (recommended) or go directly to the free Biblical Interpretation Seminar, Written Textbook http://www.freebiblecommentary.org/pdf/seminar_textbook.pdf I also recommend watching the seminar videos.

Bible study requires dedication (commitment), time, effort, energy and a willingness to change one's mind concerning elements of their belief system (grow spiritually). It is not a trivial exercise! In fact, it is dangerous, epically to hard egos.

My Solutions: None! I have a few ideas, but nothing I consider as "God given instructions to the church"!

May your studies be fruitful.