Search results

Your interpretation would require that it is infallible and that God has given you the authority to teach your interpretation. God would reveal to the Church you are appointed so that kind of claim is worthy of belief.

The error in that is that It obligatesn me to believe that Jesus gave Himself in part. That He is a husband who holds back part of Himself. That I can no longer believe He gives His whole self to His bride. That He didn't give Himself fully.

This is what happens. A Christian is persecuted for believing and communicating Christ or for responding to situations as Jesus would. persecution behind. That s is usually very confusing. Persecution is an opportunity to forgive. That forgiveness is the key. That is what conforms our suffering...

From where does the blood of Christ flow? His soul? His divinity? If what you believe is true Paul wouldn't have taught that we are members of His Body. He would teach what you do and not even include us. But he did. He even taught that he is suffering to make up for Christ's Paul never said...

The teaching of the cross in your view is an understanding of Jesus' Sacrifice and the salvific meaning of Jesus suffering. The Cross Paul taught us includes our sacrifice and the salvific meaning of our suffering. Paul was very clear that his suffering had salvific meaning and necessary for the...

S Scripture is subject to human interpretation. The Ethiopian Eunuch demonstrated that. The bible alone couldn't save him. The bible alone is gnostic in it's insistence that God reveals and guides internally alone. Addiction to alonism. Lol

You reject the Cross. That's the work you reject. Paul taught the Cross not by eloquent words. Jesus said that Paul had much to suffer. That's what reveals the Cross. Even though Paul taught His suffering did what Jesus suffering did but for the people and in the way the people in his sphere...

Wait, you claim that we(Catholics) ignorantly seek salvation in works of the Law. How are we destroying it too? Oh ok. Because you want to cling to Law that you think the Catholic Church destroyed and reject what ever the Catholic Church put in It's place.

You agree then. It's true. That's the power of the cross. Guess what .... our suffering doesn't have to match Paul's. Paul taught us to offer our members as an acceptable offering ... Right? If we die with Him we will rise too. That's redemptive suffering in the here and now. The cross is...

You can't accept a Church that has divine power. Forgives sin. A teaching authority protected by Divine power. Has the promise of enduring till the end. Why do you deny the promises and gifts Jesus gave His Church? Can't admit that thos exist. Jesus couldn't follow through with whatever he...

24 Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church, 25 of which I became a minister What good is it to

I believe the written form of the Word is true. But it can't teach infallibly. You're confusing the two

You share in Christ's suffering and offer up your Sacrifice to the Father with Jesus? Do you believe that like Jesus Sacrifice, our suffering has power to redeem people around us ? That's the cross as Paul taught.

From the guy that doesn't understand what a tradition is so isn't able to grasp what Jesus taught about it either

Whether or not the Scriptures are Holy is not relevant to a discussion about infallible teaching. If you believe the bible is inerrant why would there not be a way to benefit from it? If it was taught before why would there not be a way to benefit from that?

My question should be easy for you then. I know I would be afraid of sinning against truth if I'm going to claim what somebody holds true is wrong without understanding what it is.

You've been fed a lie about tradition to groom you to believe Jesus had condemned tradition. Do you even know what a tradition of men is ?Sorry I butted in

Which Catholic beliefs are corrupting protestant Churches? They carried over by Luther or Calvin?

There are many you add to scripture habitually. Most protestants consider them just as sacred. One that attached to the end of sentence s "" the finished work of Christ." That is not necessary for us or you.That was an accusation of " crucifying The st over and over. So .... another is " not by...

Is it infallible teaching? Answer, Christ Crucified, Paul taught. That is a logical fallacy. It's called 'Appeal to authority' because you can't declare your teaching infallible. So if that is a definitive infallible interpretation of scripture Infallible as the Word you say. Meaning what the...