Search results

Of course, you disagree. The 62 weeks ended when Messiah the Prince was cut off. And at the same moment, He confirmed the final week when he shed his blood, just as Scripture I quoted said. It is finished, Christ said.

Everyone... Luk 22:19-20 (19) And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. (20) Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you...

Invading Prince?! That is not what God said. You add it to His Word. Who was his people at the time when he was put to death by them. Humm?

You are reading into it with two princes to fit your flawed doctrine. It is all about context. The prince of verse 26 is still talking about Messiah the prince PER context. The English rule does not allow you to insert a third-party prince in the same sentence. Daniel 9:24-27 is about God...

That is right, for once. No, the Messiah, referred to as the Prince in verse 26, is Jesus Christ. The people associated with this prince were the Jews, representing the congregation that embodied the Kingdom of God but opposed Christ, who is the true city and sanctuary. This is why Christ told...

Very good.

Your interpreation is deeply flawed! Dan 9:24-27 (24) Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and...

Incorrect. The covenant was confirmed by Jesus Christ with his blood when he died on the Cross. Please read Hebrew 9 carefully. Nope. I know MANY people believe that army of Gog and Magog is some Russians and/or Islamic nations will attack national Israel with physical war that will take 7...

You need to research more. The covenant is a testament... a will! A will that cannot become a force unless Christ (mediator of the new testament) dies first. Mat 26:28 "For this is my blood of the new testament (G1242), which is shed for many for the remission of sins." Heb 9:15-17 (15) And...

False. If the new covenant wasn't confirmed or made strength at the Cross, but instead in the "future", then we are not saved today.

(14) And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. The wings symbolize the protection of God. The Wilderness is typifying the world (a...

You do err. Rev 12:7-17 (7) And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, Michael is a signification for Jesus Christ. The Hebrew origin is [miykael], means "whom or he, is surely God." It's taken from three root words...

Wrong. Zechariah 14 was about the fall of Old Testament Congregation. And the Saints fled into the New Testament congregation where Christians has kept the Feast of the Tabernacles since the Cross. The chapter has NOTHING to do with national Israel in the end. If you have the wisdom of Christ...

Incorrect. Apollyon “IS” Satan. Revelation 9:11 "And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon." Actually, Satan is not an Angel, he is a SPIRIT, the "messenger" of evil...

Yes! hlo

LOL. You say things like this because you did not like the truth when you hear, so I am good. Like I said many times, the Lord judges and I am comfortable with it. :-)

Wanna some tissues?

So? You knew what post I was talking about. Look it up. Oh, I handled it very well; you don't receive the truth very well, obviously.

Have fun sitting on a heap of 70AD destruction and build your flawed doctrine over it. You got the wrong stones. Do your homework. Like I have said, I have dealt with many people who believe the same way you do. Many of them have admitted to see the Truth. So just as I thought, you have...

I am NOT embarrassed at all. My statement is still valid FOR YOU and WPM. I have handled many more people with your views elsewhere too, so...please.