Search results

I have already explained my view. If you don't understand what I've said, then I can't help that. Instead of just asking endless questions, how about you tell me your understanding of these passages... Colossians 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of...

I have already done that. Jesus will come at the end of the age (Matt 24:3) and Jesus Himself said at the end of the age is when the righteous will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father (Matthew 13:40-43).

We don't, of course. Look at what she was willing to resort to in order to support her doctrine and make it fit Revelation 20:6. Trying to say that those who are alive when Christ comes will be resurrected? No. They will be alive. No resurrection is necessary for them since only the dead are...

So, you think we should just ignore the original text that was written in Greek?

Peter said that David prophesied that God told him that He will RAISE UP Christ to sit on his (David's) throne and said he was prophesying about Jesus being RAISED UP from the dead.

No, it says they live (zao) and reign with Christ. Their souls live and reign with Christ in heaven. The word "zao" is not one that is used to describe being resurrected. That word is "anazao" which is used in verse 5 to describe the rest of the dead. Scripture teaches that Christ's resurrection...

Don't try to speak for me. I explained my view in a way that everone but you can understand. I don't need to waste my time just explaining something to someone like you who has terrible reading comprehension skills. I can't miraculously give you good reading comprehension skills. Ask God for...

Says the guy making a "juvenile stupidity attack".

There is no rapture to heaven, but there is a rapture to meet Jesus "in the air", so there is nothing wrong with showing that it is post-trib.

Uh huh. That's called the church. So, that is who Peter was addressing. Very simple. You make simple things very convoluted for no reason. He is speaking to and about the same people in verse 9 as he does in verses 5 and 6.

Because that's the New Testament and he doesn't care much for that. He gets his understanding entirely from the Old Testament without allowing the New Testament to shed light on it.

Are you just trying to stir up trouble? It speaks for itself to those with discernment who can see that it speaks plainly and straightforwardly. We take the time to explain that to those lacking in discernment.

This is hopeless. Our views are very far apart. I don't feel like discussing this with you anymore. Have a nice day.

It's the same kingdom but takes on different forms. Scripture itself refers to the kingdom of the Son and also the kingdom of the Father. Is there something you don't understand about that? Colossians 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance...

When do you believe the end of the age will occur in relation to Christ's second coming?

Yes, that verse also shows that the Father begins to reign when Jesus comes again, showing that is when Jesus hands over the kingdom to the Father.

Right. I was obviously speaking in a different sense than what is written about here. Right. Not all Premills believe Jesus will reign for a new physical temple at that time, but that verse definitely refutes that belief. Why some ignore this is beyond me.

It would appear that you have misrepresented my view yet again. It would appear that you have poor reading comprehension skills.

His kingdom exists spiritually now, as scripture makes abundantly clear. Tell me, is He your King right now? But, at His future second coming Jesus will hand the kingdom over to the Father and then the Father will reign over the kingdom for eternity in the new heavens and new earth with even...

To those with spiritual discernment, the text speaks for itself and is very straightforward. There was a prophecy David made about God RAISING UP Christ to sit on David's throne and in that prophecy he spoke of God RAISING UP Christ from the dead. That is what Peter plainly said. But, those...