Search results

I acknowledge the validity of that statement. Paul's argument primarily emphasizes that the death of Jesus Christ on the cross serves as the foundation for the New Covenant. Since the prophet Jeremiah foretold the establishment of this New Covenant, it implies that the old covenant is no longer...

The complete thought is conveyed by two words: παρεπιδήμοις διασπορᾶς As you rightly point out, the Greek word "παρεπιδήμοις" indicates foreigners who are living abroad. Putting this idea together with the Greek word "διασπορᾶς" which means "Israelites dispersed among foreign nations," we...

It seems there has been a misunderstanding regarding the context of Peter's statement. Peter referenced David to support his assertion that David's son would not experience decay, emphasizing that this was a prophecy about the resurrection necessary for him to occupy the throne of David. It is...

We are discussing Revelation 20:4, where John says the martyrs were given life. I assume you have a handle on most of the common interpretations of the passage. You hold that ἔζησαν (ezēsan) indicates that the souls lived with Christ for a thousand years, whereas the Greek word means "came to...

In 1 Peter 2:5-6, Peter employs a vivid metaphorical framework rooted in tangible realities. He draws from the imagery of a physical temple built from stones, the sacred role of the Levite priesthood, and the tradition of animal sacrifices. Within this metaphor, he conveys that all...

So you agree? The text does not speak for itself.

Yes. I very much appreciate your thoughtful answers. This is how I learn. I wouldn’t take that as a given. The disciples' unease stemmed from Jesus' alarming proclamation about the imminent destruction of the temple. Their distress was rooted in an unspoken belief that Jesus was destined to...

If the text speaks for itself, why did you write an entire page explanation filled with colors and bold lettering?

Is predestination not found in the Bible?

It seems like your conclusion doesn't quite align with what I expressed, taking my statements further than I intended. Peter is writing specifically to a community of Christians who are also the descendants of Jacob, and who find themselves living in exile away from their homeland. This dual...

Yes, isn't it obvious? You speak of Christ ruling over his spiritual subjects and so you should. But don't ignore Paul's word that Christ will rule over the nations after he returns, defeating his enemies. The disciples approached Jesus burdened with a series of misconceptions regarding what...

I see no Biblical evidence to support your contention that a soul can be killed. Jesus encourages both the public and his disciples when he remarked, "I say to you, My friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that have no more that they can do."

You are blending two distinct yet interconnected concepts. God made a profound promise to David, assuring him that his son would not remain in the grave to endure the decay that follows death. This promise held significant implications, as it also meant that Jesus would ultimately take his place...

Good question. Paul teaches us that at the Last Trumpet, those in Christ will be taken up into the air to be with him forever. Since they are forgiven, they don't experience judgment. God has already decided to give them eternal life.

If I understand your position, I agree with it. Christians need to remember that Salvation is a gift that can be refused but those whom God has sanctified with his spirit will never refuse it or reject it.

That is an error. Peter's letter is addressed to churches in Asia, whose congregations are comprised of Jacob's descendants living outside the country. Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who reside as aliens, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, who...

Of course, why repeat a point that I conceded? Why not look at the Jeremiah passage objectively? The text in bold below has not been fulfilled. Jeremiah 31:33-34 “But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the Lord, “I will put My law within...

Some of it has come to pass. I reminded you about 1948, when God brought Israel back to the land to reestablish the nation of Israel. But Israel remains as the dead body surrounded by vultures, waiting for the fulfillment of Ezekiel 37:1-14.

This isn't true. Jesus said that their houses would be left desolate as a judgment against them (Matthew 23). The promise God made to their houses is a future hope for Israel.

I didn't ignore your post. I simply recognized it as a repeat of the same post from other discussions on the same subject that I already answered and rejected.