Naomi25
Well-Known Member
- Aug 10, 2016
- 3,199
- 1,802
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
Just calling it as I see it. Feel free to provide biblical facts to the contrary...if you can.Call it "underwhelming evidence".
Now...it's interesting to me that you label this a FACT. Fact: you say, that the Bride of Christ is present in heaven preceding the second coming of Christ. Fact: this must be the Marriage of the Lamb.The FACT -- the biblical FACT -- that the Marriage of the Lamb (where the Bride of Christ is present in Heaven) precedes the Second Coming of Christ totally demolishes your position.
The problem is, its not FACT, it's supposition. And I'll tell you why. There is no biblical verse that teaches it outright. That makes proving it as a "fact" interesting. That means falling upon corroborating verses to build an understanding; which is fine, we do that with plenty of biblically solid teachings. But this? Let's just walk through it for a minute. You say that the bible teaches that at an "any moment" instant, Christ will snatch away his "Bride", for seven years in heaven...the Marriage supper of the Lamb. While things on earth are bad. God pours his judgement out on the earth and it's inhabitants, right?
You also say that during this time many people, and many Jews, will come to faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour. This is where your doctrine gets dicey. Because...who is the Bride? You obviously say it is the Church up until the point of Rapture. But that is unspecified by scripture, and I challenge you to prove otherwise. The bible says in 2 Cor 11 that we, as Christians are 'betrothed to Christ'. 1 Corinthians 12:12 says - "For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ."
You may want to make a distinction between those saved before the "Tribulation" and those after, but the bible does not.
So I ask you...how do you biblically justify those Christians being left out of the Marriage of the Lamb? How do you biblically justify some Christians not being subjected to God's wrath, but others having to endure it? Ultimately, what you are teaching is a form of classism. The Christians who go in the Rapture are a higher class of Christians that the ones who come later.
And friend, there is no way to support that from scripture. I absolutely challenge you to try.
Unless Christ first comes in the air for the Church at the Resurrection/Rapture, He cannot come with the saints to earth at His Second Coming. Technically that is the return of Christ to earth.
You know...I never understood this attempt at a defense from the Pre-trib crowd, I'm sorry. We know that those 'asleep in Christ'...all our loved ones, and all the biblical heroes of the past, are in heaven with Christ now. We're also told in scripture that they will receive their resurrection bodies before those who are 'left and alive' at the time of Christ's return.
So....why is it so hard to imagine a great horde of Christians at Christ's back while those on earth witness it?
Also, the whole "the first time he only comes to the clouds, the second time he touches the earth" is just semantics and fancy foot work. I mean..really? Unless he teleports, which Acts 1 says not, then of course he comes through the clouds on his way to earth.
Needless to say, I don't find these arguments at all persuasive, and...sorry...not biblically backed up. They're nit-picked in order to support a pre-held desire.
But it is NOT at the end of age, since there are many events between the Second Coming of Christ and the New Heavens and the New Earth.
I am so glad you bought up the 'end of the age'. Because it's such an important issue in the conversation of Christ's return.
Just as the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so will it be at the end of the age. The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers, and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear. -Matthew 13:40–43
So, what can we agree upon happening here? Clearly, the 'end of the age' sees the gathering and judgement of the wicked. Right? But we also see that the wicked are gathered out of 'the Kingdom of the Son of Man' and that it is at this time that the righteous shall 'shine like the sun' in the Kingdom of their Father. Indeed, in the parable, the good and bad seed are 'harvested together' at the end. Hmm. Interesting, no?
As he sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” -Matthew 24:3
“Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. -Matthew 24:29–31
In the Olivet Discourse Christ answers the Disciples direct answer about his coming and the end of the age, and his reply is that it will be AFTER the tribulation. He describes his return and the Rapture at this time quite clearly.
In fact, when we do an in-depth study of "this age" and "the age to come", and take care to track the events spoken of in regards to these ages and Christ's return, it becomes clear that not only can the Pre-trib Rapture not be found in scripture, but an earthly millennium cannot either. Again, I'm happy to go into how I see this, but I suppose one conversation at a time.