No one can do that until they 'get's real ones'.
Substitutes for a real answer is just another red herring; please tell me that your foundation is more than wishful thinking!
Once again, the statements are:
No passage in Scripture says that Jesus "paid for sins."
Some have said here that "He "paid our fine". Where in Scripture does it equate the Atonement to paying fines?
All I see are answers that
assume something to exist. Do we just base everything we read on an
assumption, and reconcile our beliefs to justify that
assumption? Is that a sound hermeneutic?
I have also stated that the Theory appeared in the 1500's, and it was invented to prop up a Philosophical System.
A payment made cannot be unpaid. If anyone goes to hell, then God does not really love the
whole world, but only a few. People are not saved by grace through faith, but by payment. Either you were paid for 2000 years ago, or you were not. Belief and Faith have no bearing on whether you were paid for. Even Calvin said that God deludes people who are not Elect to believe that they are Christians on the way to heaven, just to be used as His tools to achieve His will. He will then make them crash and burn in Hell "for His glory." No one knows if they are saved, or if they are hopelessly on their way to Hell; deluded and tricked by God, only to be kicked to the curb for God's glory!
Preaching, and praying do nothing in the way of reaching anyone for the Lord. God gives the illusion of conversion when He wills, or can just take them to heaven apart from any faith or belief since He loved and "paid for them."
If you believe in Penal Substitution, you do not do it because you read it in Scripture, but because were taught to believe it.
If you believe that "Whosoever Will" means
all people, and that God offers a
genuine offer of salvation to the lost (those that their "sins were paid for"
were never lost since
they were saved from all eternity), and you teach payment of sins, you entangle yourself in hopeless contradiction.