That may depend on how we define "mysticism." If you knew me better, you might call me a mystic. I have been skeptical about my own mystical experiences. Many people are not; but then again many Christians are not skeptical about their religion. Just think about it. Protestants and Catholics killing each other by the millions. Both sides were convinced they were right and being led by God.
I would define mysticism as man's attempts to experience what mystics call a "mystical union" or "ecstatic union" with God using some form of "spiritual disciplines" or practices NOT taught in the Bible. If these practices were a way to experience union with God, the apostles would have practiced and taught these spiritual disciplines to the early church, but we see no evidence of this in the Bible. What IS taught in the Bible is the gifts of the Holy Spirit. I'll address this in a minute.
Paul uses the term "mystery" to describe the union of Christ and the Church, but this is seen as a "mystical" experience by mystics. I see these as being very different. Our union with Jesus Christ is a mystery just as a husband and wife becoming one flesh is a mystery, but we do not enter a mystical union with Him whereby we are melded into Him and lose our distinction as humans. IOW, we don't become Jesus Christ or God.
The "disciplines" used by mystics include practices such as contemplative prayer (also called breath prayers or centering prayer) in which the person chants a word or short phrase over and over, which is similar to chanting in Eastern meditation. Sadly, breath prayers are taught by Rick Warren in
A Purpose-Driven Life. In this book Warren also extensively quotes from the so-called Christian mystics.
As I shared in my other post above yours, every major religion has a mystical sect. How can it be that Christianity is lumped in with other religions, sharing a common "mystical" experience, which mystics will tell you is the best way to get close to God.
I've been in churches too that gave me the creeps at times. The people in them thought the Holy Spirit was moving. In one church (I'd rather not name the denomination), I saw a demon hovering in the air. No one else saw it, of course. I prayed, and it went away. Then it came back. I did it again; and when it returned again, I realized people wanted it there.
Like you, I've gotten the creeps in some churches. The devil is always trying to counterfeit the move of the Holy Spirit! So, not all that you see in churches is a genuine move of the HOLY Spirit. It could be a move of another kind of spirit. This is why we need spiritual discernment.
Having said this, it's important not to throw out the baby with bathwater. I do believe that the Holy Spirit still moves in powerful ways in the Church (meaning believers) through the spiritual gifts, which I strongly believe did NOT cease with the apostles as cessationism teaches. That's a whole other can of worms for a different thread. But I believe that cessationism has left a vacuum in the Church which has been filled with mystical beliefs and practices because the power of Holy Spirit has been quenched. So, people are desiring to see God's power, so they seek it through mystical experiences, but I believe that what they find is counterfeit power.
You're interested in the LDS, so let me discuss Joseph Smith's alleged "first" vision when two figures appeared to him. (This is the usual story, there were different versions.) They identified themselves as God the Father and Jesus. Would you believe such a vision if you had it? I would not. Smith did however. That by itself could be deemed harmless perhaps; but we see how he set himself up as a prophet. Then things took a bad turn. I don't think I need to tell you about the violence Smith advocated or about the dishonest bank he set up. The "tree" was bearing "bad" fruit. Yet he persisted, and his followers remained loyal.
I certainly would NOT believe such a vision if the "Father" and "Jesus" are saying anything contrary to what They said in the Bible! Which is exactly what happened to Joseph Smith. I'm curious as to why you didn't explain in the "Mormonism" thread what you're saying in this post. It would be a valuable contribution to that thread. Instead, you criticized me for quoting a former Mormon. ;)
I don't see much difference between mysticism and what so many think is the Holy Spirit. People can go astray either way. I look to see if pride or greed is at work. To be sure, my "best" mystical experiences were those where I learned I was wrong about something or where I had a flaw pointed out to me gently for my own good.
Remember too that Jesus said he had sheep in other folds; and some of those sheep may not call themselves Christians but they still obey his commandments. Paul also said the Gospel had been preached already to every creature. God can work in hidden ways.
As I've said before, there's a HUGE difference between the practices used by mystics and the gifts of the Holy Spirit taught in the Bible and used by believers. These mystical practices are NOT promoted anywhere in the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible are we instructed to chant in order to experience an "ecstatic union" with God like the Eastern mystics do.
And what is the basis for this "mystical union"? It's not Jesus Christ! He is essentially bypassed in the mystical process, and yet, He says in His word that He IS the way to the Father--to experience God Himself. We cannot go any other way--not through some "spiritual disciplines" that are not taught in the Bible. Our very real union with God is through His Holy Spirit indwelling us.
As you can see, I feel very strongly about this issue because I see mysticism as a major tool the devil is using to bring about the great falling away from biblical truth. THIS is the apostasy talked about in the Bible, not what Joseph Smith alleged.
I urge you and anyone else dabbling in mysticism to seriously consider what I'm saying. I believe that mystical practices are very dangerous and lead a person the wrong direction into the enemy's camp, not into a closer relationship with God!
.