Trump is the worst President to hold this office

[Bobby Jo]

To All,
Apparently AOC was featured on SNL, and it's certainly worth a few minutes of your time:

Bobby Jo

 

[Phoneman777]

Trump is the worst President to hold this office;

for the first time I have a prayer that needs fulfilling

Please God, I pray that never again let anyone like trump hold the office of President of the USA

Amen

Anyone else agree?

Lowest unemployment in 50 years. Lowest female unemployment since the 1950's. But, he's the "worst", right?

 

[tooldtocare]

Lowest unemployment in 50 years. Lowest female unemployment since the 1950's. But, he's the "worst", right?

None of the above was a result of Trump's actions; but instead it was in spite of him.

 

[Phoneman777]

None of the above was a result of Trump's actions; but instead it was in spite of him.

You've got to be kidding! Pleaee explain.

 

[tooldtocare]

You've got to be kidding! Pleaee explain.

The Trump I see today is NOT the man he “said” he was during the election
Trump admires the “ruler” of Russia and North Korea because they will remain in power for life. He sees himself as a “ruler” & during his second term in office he will abolish the two-term limit and appoint himself as the prime master leader; for life, a power he believes he can pass on to his children,
Setting that aside for a moment I have this to refresh your memory about Trump-----------

----Donald Trump's greatest achievements---- (to date)

Trump revokes background checks to buy guns
NEWS FEB 28 2017, 8:39 PM ET
Trump Signs Bill Revoking Obama-Era Gun Checks for People With Mental Illnesses
President Donald Trump quietly signed a bill into law Tuesday rolling back an Obama-era regulation that made it harder for people with mental illnesses to purchase a gun.
Trump signs bill revoking Obama-era gun checks for mental illness

Tell me, do you agree with Trump's action? Please explain why?

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Monday rejected an Obama-era plan to make automobiles more fuel efficient, opening up a long process to weaken current standards and putting California and the federal government on a collision course over vehicle emissions.
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2018/04/02/world/asia/02reuters-usa-epa-autos.ht...

Tell me, do you agree with Trump's action? Please explain why?

Trump sons' hunting in focus as US lifts import ban on African elephant trophies
The Trump administration’s decision to loosen restrictions around the import of elephant trophies from Zimbabwe and Zambia has turned attention back to the president’s family’s own connection to the controversial sport.
Donald Trump Jr and Eric Trump are prolific big-game hunters and during the 2016 campaign, images re-emerged of the pair on a 2011 hunting trip posing with animals they had killed on safari, including an elephant, a buffalo and a leopard.
Jane on Twitter

Tell me, do you agree with Trump's action? Please explain why?

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump again called for an end to the filibuster and said there will be no deal with Democrats on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, also known as DACA.

NOW. NO MORE DACA DEAL," Trump tweeted Sunday morning.
Trump tweets: 'NO MORE DACA DEAL' - CNNPolitics

Tell me, do you agree with Trump's action? Please explain why?

The proposal by the U.S. Department of Energy would lower the status of some high-level radioactive waste in several places around the nation, including the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state — the most contaminated nuclear site in the country.

Reclassifying the material to low-level could save the agency billions of dollars and decades of work by essentially leaving the material in the ground, critics say.
https://www.christianforums.com/threads/trump-plans-to-reclassify-nuclear-waste-...

Tell me, do you agree with Trump's action? Please explain why?

 

[Phoneman777]

The Trump I see today is NOT the man he “said” he was during the election. Trump admires the “ruler” of Russia and North Korea because they will remain in power for life. He sees himself as a “ruler” & during his second term in office he will abolish the two-term limit and appoint himself as the prime master leader; for life, a power he believes he can pass on to his children

You obviously understand very little about the way things work. A change in the Constitution which prohibits more than two consecutive terms requires a 2/3 majority STATES (not Congressional) vote.

Setting that aside for a moment I have this to refresh your memory about Trump---Donald Trump's greatest achievements---- (to date) Trump revokes background checks to buy guns

What part of "...shall not be infringed" do you not get? Right now, some states are now declaring anyone who has a script for Medical Mary Jane has forfeited their 2A right to own a gun. I'll bet the people being run over by govt armored personnel carriers wish they hadn't had their guns banned in 2012, right? Do you really America unarmed with Trump soon to be "Dictator in Chief"?

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Monday rejected an Obama-era plan to make automobiles more fuel efficient, opening up a long process to weaken current standards and putting California and the federal government on a collision course over vehicle emissions. Tell me, do you agree with Trump's action? Please explain why

Let's get something straight. One massive eruption of a single volcano spews more Ozone depleting elements in to the atmosphere than all the stupid cars that have ever been built - do you not get that? Obama and the rest of the Demoncrat leftists are just using the climate issue for political gain, not to "save the planet". The "Global Cooling Crisis" of the 70s, the "Global Warming Crisis" that followed, and the current "Climate Change Crisis" all had/have on thing in common: the Democrat solution of MASSIVE EXPANSION OF THE FED GOVT AND TOTAL GOVT TAKEOVER OF THE PRIVATE ENERGY SECTOR. Anyone who thinks the climate issue is about the climate and not about a giant money/power grab by control freak communists in the fed govt should check into rehap immediately.

Trump sons' hunting in focus as US lifts import ban on African elephant trophies. The Trump administration’s decision to loosen restrictions around the import of elephant trophies from Zimbabwe and Zambia has turned attention back to the president’s family’s own connection to the controversial sport. Donald Trump Jr and Eric Trump are prolific big-game hunters and during the 2016 campaign, images re-emerged of the pair on a 2011 hunting trip posing with animals they had killed on safari, including an elephant, a buffalo and a leopard.

So what? The undisputed heavyweight champion of Wildlife Conservation awareness and economic support are hunters, but you Fake News watching leftists don't have a clue about that, right? Not to mention the contribution to the local economy of African nations who sponsor and regulate Big Game hunting by these same hunters. If you don't like hunting, then don't go hunting, but stop telling everyone else how to live their lives!

Donald Trump again called for an end to the filibuster and said there will be no deal with Democrats on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, also known as DACA.

So what? He can call for whatever he wants. Pelosi and her leftists had the chance to make a deal for DACA: give Trump his 5-10 billion for a wall. Y'know, the same Pelosi who said "Trump won't get a single dollar for the wall"? How much did Barry O give Iran just before he left office? Oh, yeah, FIVE HUNNIT BILLION IN CASH, but we can't scrape together a measly TEN for a border wall? Blame Pelosi for no DACA deal.

The proposal by the U.S. Department of Energy would lower the status of some high-level radioactive waste in several places around the nation, including the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state — the most contaminated nuclear site in the country. Reclassifying the material to low-level could save the agency billions of dollars and decades of work by essentially leaving the material in the ground, critics say.

To be honest, I've not heard of this issue, but if a govt agency says we ought to do thus and such to save money, I immediately without looking know we ought to do the opposite of whatever they're recommending...call it experience...once bitten, twice shy...whatever.

 

[CoreIssue]

tooldtocare
is it far left liberal.

Probably supports Bernie Sanders.

 

[tooldtocare]

You obviously understand very little about the way things work. A change in the Constitution which prohibits more than two consecutive terms requires a 2/3 majority STATES (not Congressional) vote.

I didn't know that which exposes my ignorance.
Phoneman777, thanks for the info

 

[Phoneman777]

I didn't know that which exposes my ignorance.
Phoneman777, thanks for the info

No problem. Trust me, Trump ain't going past 2 terms.

 

[tooldtocare]

But, he's the "worst", right?

Right !!!
On a side note, Phoneman777, please visit this forum which is here in the Christianity Board--
Then give me you opinion of the topic-?
The Ice Ball-The Melt-The beginning of life---The Here & NOW
The Ice Ball-The Melt-The beginning of life---The Here & NOW

 

[Phoneman777]

Right !!!
On a side note, Phoneman777, please visit this forum which is here in the Christianity Board--
Then give me you opinion of the topic-?
The Ice Ball-The Melt-The beginning of life---The Here & NOW
The Ice Ball-The Melt-The beginning of life---The Here & NOW

The Bible says the Earth has only been around for about 6,000 years, and I hope you read some of the following excerpts of the vast body of evidence that exists to support the Bible, while the evidence for "millions of years" is extremely suspect.

Radiometric Dating:
among the problems with such dating methods are that there are huge assumptions which have to be made, assumptions which we cannot in any way confirm:

• rates of decay of radioactive particles remained constant in the past
• no translocation of heavy metals in or out of rocks like the effect of acid rain today
• that at the time of birth of the rock there was only radioactive zircons and no lead present, etc.

- too many assumptions for such dating methods to even being to approach any degree of reliability. Newborn rocks belted out of volcanoes can vary by zillions of years with these dating methods, while the Helium Diffusion Dating Method (which measures the amount of Helium that remains in radioactive zircons) proves that it's impossible for these rocks to be that old, because Helium is a "noble gas" which means it's molecules do not like to bond with anything and are small enough to wiggle around atomic structures and escape into the atmosphere - the abundant presence of Helium that is still in these "millions of years old" zircons is a nightmare for the atheistic scientific community (ASC).

Also, Polonium Halos:
discovery by Seventh-day Adventist scientist Dr. Robert Gentry which turned the entire ASC upside down. When he first published his findings in the premiere, rock star science journal Nature, weeks and weeks of stunned silence from the community went by, until the silence became absolutely embarrassing. Today, weak theories are offered by the ASC to "disprove" Gentry but they're just nonsensical bulldookey (as claimed by creation scientists) but all that matters to the ASC fanboys is that the ASC give anything in response to the claim, and don't care if it makes sense or not.

Polonium has an extremely short half life: just a few moments relatively speaking. There's no way they should be present in the granites, which the ASC claims were formed by "slow cooling of magma over millions of years." To understand how the Halos disprove this, drop an Alka Seltzer into a glass of water and put it in the freezer to "slow cool into a solid (ice)" just as the magma is claimed to have "slow cooled into a solid". The bubbles in the glass represent Polonium. Question: How long before the bubbles disappear? Answer: That water will not even drop a single degree in temp before they are gone, so by the time the water turns solid, they've been long gone, right?

Likewise, Polonium should have long disappeared (by decaying into the next daughter isotope in its journey to becoming inert lead) long before the magma had a chance to "slow cool into a solid"...yet, it's there. Gentry's explanation is that the only way for Polonium to exist in the granites is that they were INSTANTLY FORMED - exactly what the Bible says in Psalm 33:6-9. There's simply no other explanation but the ASC will never admit that.

Inexplicable Geo formations:
A rock layer differs by "millions of years" from the ones above or below it. However, there are tons of examples of rock layers penetrating other rock layers, with perfect mixing of the two, some protruding horizontally up through several layers that lie above them, folding, twisting...things that can't possibly happen to solid rock which would shatter into a bazillion pieces under such immense geological forces. Again, the ASC claims "oh, they were dropped into the belly of the Earth by Depression, heated, twisted, folded, etc., then Uplift pushed them back to the surface". Problem: There is example after example of these formations with no sign of any heat whatsover. The only solution is that these layers were all laid down as soft mud layers turbidites during the Flood era and developed into these formations before completely hardening into solid rock.

Short Chronology of Petrified Forests:
ASC claims they took "hundreds of thousands of years" to form, sometimes 30-40 forests stacked one on top the other and that they are formed by volcanic eruptions burying a forest, another grows up in its place only to be buried by another eruption, and the process is repeated over thousands of years until - viola - your Petrified Forest. However, the evidence says otherwise: When an eruptive cycle takes place, the volcanic bowl fills up with various materials until the pressure is sufficient for an eruption. Scientist know that the chemical makeup of the magma that fills a volcanic bowl is like a fingerprint. They also know that after 3 months, the fingerprint changes. When they tested the Petrified Forest from top to bottom at Yellowstone, guess what the found? The entire forest from top to bottom is composed of the same exact volcanic material, which means the entire thing was laid down in just a few months, not "hundreds of thousands of years", as claimed.

Epigene Attack: The rate of erosion of the Earth's surface today is about 3" to 6' per year, depending on where you test. Every year, 75 billion tons of rock and sediment is washed into the oceans. If you calculate using the slowest rate of erosion, 3" per year, it would only take about 10 billion years for erosion to wash all the continents into the ocean...and yet, everything's still here after "hundreds of millions of years", right? The ASC says, "Hold on, although they're being wiped out from the top from Erosion, we have Continental Uplift keeping pace by pushing up from the bottom." Sounds legit. Question: If everything that was on the bottom has been moving up through the middle to the top and then swept away into the ocean, why is the fossil record still down there? It should have long since moved up to the top and disappeared into the ocean.

I have to stop here, but I encourage you to reconsider what the Bible says about origins of the cosmos, the Earth, and mankind :)

 

[CoreIssue]

The Bible says the Earth has only been around for about 6,000 years, and I hope you read some of the following excerpts of the vast body of evidence that exists to support the Bible, while the evidence for "millions of years" is extremely suspect.

Radiometric Dating:
among the problems with such dating methods are that there are huge assumptions which have to be made, assumptions which we cannot in any way confirm:

• rates of decay of radioactive particles remained constant in the past
• no translocation of heavy metals in or out of rocks like the effect of acid rain today
• that at the time of birth of the rock there was only radioactive zircons and no lead present, etc.

- too many assumptions for such dating methods to even being to approach any degree of reliability. Newborn rocks belted out of volcanoes can vary by zillions of years with these dating methods, while the Helium Diffusion Dating Method (which measures the amount of Helium that remains in radioactive zircons) proves that it's impossible for these rocks to be that old, because Helium is a "noble gas" which means it's molecules do not like to bond with anything and are small enough to wiggle around atomic structures and escape into the atmosphere - the abundant presence of Helium that is still in these "millions of years old" zircons is a nightmare for the atheistic scientific community (ASC).

Also, Polonium Halos:
discovery by Seventh-day Adventist scientist Dr. Robert Gentry which turned the entire ASC upside down. When he first published his findings in the premiere, rock star science journal Nature, weeks and weeks of stunned silence from the community went by, until the silence became absolutely embarrassing. Today, weak theories are offered by the ASC to "disprove" Gentry but they're just nonsensical bulldookey (as claimed by creation scientists) but all that matters to the ASC fanboys is that the ASC give anything in response to the claim, and don't care if it makes sense or not.

Polonium has an extremely short half life: just a few moments relatively speaking. There's no way they should be present in the granites, which the ASC claims were formed by "slow cooling of magma over millions of years." To understand how the Halos disprove this, drop an Alka Seltzer into a glass of water and put it in the freezer to "slow cool into a solid (ice)" just as the magma is claimed to have "slow cooled into a solid". The bubbles in the glass represent Polonium. Question: How long before the bubbles disappear? Answer: That water will not even drop a single degree in temp before they are gone, so by the time the water turns solid, they've been long gone, right?

Likewise, Polonium should have long disappeared (by decaying into the next daughter isotope in its journey to becoming inert lead) long before the magma had a chance to "slow cool into a solid"...yet, it's there. Gentry's explanation is that the only way for Polonium to exist in the granites is that they were INSTANTLY FORMED - exactly what the Bible says in Psalm 33:6-9. There's simply no other explanation but the ASC will never admit that.

Inexplicable Geo formations:
A rock layer differs by "millions of years" from the ones above or below it. However, there are tons of examples of rock layers penetrating other rock layers, with perfect mixing of the two, some protruding horizontally up through several layers that lie above them, folding, twisting...things that can't possibly happen to solid rock which would shatter into a bazillion pieces under such immense geological forces. Again, the ASC claims "oh, they were dropped into the belly of the Earth by Depression, heated, twisted, folded, etc., then Uplift pushed them back to the surface". Problem: There is example after example of these formations with no sign of any heat whatsover. The only solution is that these layers were all laid down as soft mud layers turbidites during the Flood era and developed into these formations before completely hardening into solid rock.

Short Chronology of Petrified Forests:
ASC claims they took "hundreds of thousands of years" to form, sometimes 30-40 forests stacked one on top the other and that they are formed by volcanic eruptions burying a forest, another grows up in its place only to be buried by another eruption, and the process is repeated over thousands of years until - viola - your Petrified Forest. However, the evidence says otherwise: When an eruptive cycle takes place, the volcanic bowl fills up with various materials until the pressure is sufficient for an eruption. Scientist know that the chemical makeup of the magma that fills a volcanic bowl is like a fingerprint. They also know that after 3 months, the fingerprint changes. When they tested the Petrified Forest from top to bottom at Yellowstone, guess what the found? The entire forest from top to bottom is composed of the same exact volcanic material, which means the entire thing was laid down in just a few months, not "hundreds of thousands of years", as claimed.

Epigene Attack: The rate of erosion of the Earth's surface today is about 3" to 6' per year, depending on where you test. Every year, 75 billion tons of rock and sediment is washed into the oceans. If you calculate using the slowest rate of erosion, 3" per year, it would only take about 10 billion years for erosion to wash all the continents into the ocean...and yet, everything's still here after "hundreds of millions of years", right? The ASC says, "Hold on, although they're being wiped out from the top from Erosion, we have Continental Uplift keeping pace by pushing up from the bottom." Sounds legit. Question: If everything that was on the bottom has been moving up through the middle to the top and then swept away into the ocean, why is the fossil record still down there? It should have long since moved up to the top and disappeared into the ocean.

I have to stop here, but I encourage you to reconsider what the Bible says about origins of the cosmos, the Earth, and mankind :)

The Bible is clear man has the only been on this earth for 6000. But there is no clear statement of how old the earth is.

I have presented evidence for an old Earth and a pre-adamic Company of beings from the Bible.

The problem with young Earth is we try to attach the age of man to the age of the earth. That is a false argument.

 

[CoreIssue]

Commentaries by CoreIssue

 

[Dave L]

Commentaries by CoreIssue

Great website CI. Glad you are thinking and sharing your thoughts.

 

[CoreIssue]

Great website CI. Glad you are thinking and sharing your thoughts.

Thank you.

As you can tell by the dates that is years of work.

 

[Marymog]

Trump is the worst President to hold this office;

for the first time I have a prayer that needs fulfilling

Please God, I pray that never again let anyone like trump hold the office of President of the USA

Amen

Anyone else agree?

Woodrow Wilson was anti-Semitic and racist soooooo is that worse than Trump?

 

[Phoneman777]

The Bible is clear man has the only been on this earth for 6000. But there is no clear statement of how old the earth is.

I have presented evidence for an old Earth and a pre-adamic Company of beings from the Bible.

The problem with young Earth is we try to attach the age of man to the age of the earth. That is a false argument.

I know EXACTLY how old the Earth is. It's just a few days older than Adam - according the the crystal clear statements in Genesis 1. There are no "pre-Adamic" beings, only post-Adamic skeptics who doubt the testimony of Scripture.

 

[Phoneman777]

Woodrow Wilson was anti-Semitic and racist soooooo is that worse than Trump?

Don't forget racist Democrat LBJ said, "I'll have them niggers voting Democrat for the next hundred years." What a disgusting, racist, Kennedy-murdering pig.

But, Trump is the worst? Who fought to open an all-race inclusive country club against a racist city council in FLA? Not seeing it.

 

[Bobby Jo]

I know EXACTLY how old the Earth is. It's just a few days older than Adam - according the the crystal clear statements in Genesis 1. ...

Ummmmm, yeah, some things are depictive, -- not absolute. It's a little like where Humpty Dumpty weren't an egg. And where the forbidden fruit weren't an apple. And without a sun there weren't no 24 hour "day".

Bobby Jo

 

[Bobby Jo]

... LBJ ... Kennedy-murdering pig. ...

Maybe you could explain the how's, why's, and wherefore's. But please leave your imagination aside.



Can anyone say: Military Industrial Complex?!?
Bobby Jo