Without unconditional Election,no one would be saved.

[Anthony D'Arienzo]

It is still there in post 488 waiting for your response.
Do not worry about my "tongue" rising up in judgment against you....your posts have already given you away.

 

[justbyfaith]

justbyfaith,


[Wasn't being lazy; looked for it and couldn't find it. You are being obtusive. You are saying that you gave an answer when you didn't. ]

I did answer it....stop being a loser, man up
Post 488, answer it

If it is too difficult, scroll back 8 pages...there it is...quit stalling

It is still there in post 488 waiting for your response.
Do not worry about my "tongue" rising up in judgment against you....your posts have already given you away.

There is nothing in post #488 that addresses what I posted. If there is, go back and post what I posted, and then post the words in post #488 that answer it. It's kind of like "yvette nicole brown" be right back to make it more evident what I am saying by this.

What you are asking me to find is either non-existent or else it is hidden as a needle in a haystack...practically unfindable.

 

[Anthony D'Arienzo]

There is nothing in post #488 that anddresses what I posted. If there is, go back and post what I posted, and then post the words in post #488 that answer it. It's kind of like "nicole yvette brown" be right back to make it more evident what I am saying by this.

In the first sentence I pointed out that nothing that you wrote if he is in Romans 5-1 into nothing about a mansion nothing about it key and nothing about all the other stories your telling. So I want you to know answer 488 as I went through the passes and showed what it teaches. If you think I'm in error show it

 

[justbyfaith]

In the first sentence I pointed out that nothing that you wrote if he is in Romans 5-1 into nothing about a mansion nothing about it key and nothing about all the other stories your telling. So I want you to know answer 488 as I went through the passes and showed what it teaches. If you think I'm in error show it

Already have...blind eyes are incapable of seeing.

 

[Anthony D'Arienzo]

Already have...blind eyes are incapable of seeing.

Clearly you are.not up to the task. I knew you could.not because you have no theological base.
You have confirmed it now.

 

[Preacher4Truth]

Clearly you are.not up to the task. I knew you could.not because you have no theological base.
You have confirmed it now.

You've offered him some biblical posts, yet he's refused them all as if doing so is a personal attack on him. It is not, if he'd finally listen to what is posted he'd see that the things offered are sound, and that he needs to own up to his Romans 5 debacle he'd gain some ground. Looks like he'd rather spin his wheels. I'm betting this will continue for years, over, and over, and over, and over.

Not sure what to do though, he's already stated that reading a verse in context is just too much work. It's easier to just take God's name and word and distort it like 2 Peter 3:16. That's plain lazy, especially with one who argues on here all day long. Obviously he has no time to read Scripture in context, so it's doubtful he even reads responses. But if you want to be called Satan, lost, and get hit with some Benny Hinn take on Isaiah, well, it's all the rage for this guy.

 

[Preacher4Truth]

@SovereignGrace,

You're slipping bro, heretics are gaining ground. Surely thou canst post a response and plagiarize me a bit to help out.

 

[Preacher4Truth]

...and where in the world is @Mjh29?

 

[Preacher4Truth]

Already have...blind eyes are incapable of seeing.

This is untrue, you've done nothing of the sort. Ever ask yourself why you don't tell the truth (too often) and reject Biblical truth that shows you to be in error? Pertinent questions for you. There is some concern for you, that is for certain.

 

[justbyfaith]

Clearly you are.not up to the task. I knew you could.not because you have no theological base.
You have confirmed it now.

That's true...I've never been the kind to have the perseverance to be able to find a needle in a haystack; maybe I would if it were a life or death situation: but this is not one of those.

But what isn't true is that I have no theological base...

I'm not the kind to boast, but I will say in my own defense that I have an extensive period of Bible reading every day since 1989.

 

[justbyfaith]

Gal 5:14, For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Gal 5:15, But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.

 

[Anthony D'Arienzo]

That's true...I've never been the kind to have the perseverance to be able to find a needle in a haystack; maybe I would if it were a life or death situation: but this is not one of those.

But what isn't true is that I have no theological base...

I'm not the kind to boast, but I will say in my own defense that I have an extensive period of Bible reading every day since 1989.

Romans 5 is near to the heart of the gospel.
It is hardly a needle in a haystack.
You have been exposed along with the other two.
I cannot take you serious until you respond to Romans 5....staying in the first eleven verses.

 

[Anthony D'Arienzo]

Gal 5:14, For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Gal 5:15, But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.

Good verses but they do not apply. You have to respond to post488...you can even phone a friend.

 

[justbyfaith]

Good verses but they do not apply. You have to respond to post488...you can even phone a friend.

There is nothing to respond to. Your point is obscure and I have no idea what it is; so if you want me to respond to your point, make it again.

 

[justbyfaith]

Romans 5 is near to the heart of the gospel.
It is hardly a needle in a haystack.
You have been exposed along with the other two.
I cannot take you serious until you respond to Romans 5....staying in the first eleven verses.

The teaching on Romans 5 is not what I was referring to as being a needle in a haystack.

Give me some time to meditate on the passage and to give my teaching on it.

In the meantime, perhaps you could give your commentary on what you think the passage means.

 

[justbyfaith]

btw, I have responded to post #488 with all of the following:

Without unconditional Election,no one would be saved.

Without unconditional Election,no one would be saved.

Without unconditional Election,no one would be saved.

 

[Preacher4Truth]

Good verses but they do not apply. You have to respond to post488...you can even phone a friend.

Maybe he can get on Cash Cab and do a shout out.

 

[justbyfaith]

Without unconditional Election,no one would be saved.

 

[Preacher4Truth]

Romans 5 is near to the heart of the gospel.
It is hardly a needle in a haystack.
You have been exposed along with the other two.
I cannot take you serious until you respond to Romans 5....staying in the first eleven verses.

As we've discussed, the solemn issue here is they have the Gospel wrong and that they don't understand the Gospel. They've missed the most important message of our day, the Gospel of Christ, which declares all the glory of his Person, shows how the truth of His Gospel works within a man, to submitting him under the Lordship of Christ, to humility, to obedience, under the authority of his word, to it's profitability and correction, and to the acknowledgment that salvation is all of him, 1 Corinthians 1:26-31. It is noted in this passage not all are called.

 

[Preacher4Truth]

@justbyfaith feel free to answer Romans 5. Thus far all you've done is distort its truth. Why not swallow your foolish pride and man up? And bow to Scripture? And end your misusage of God's word? Romans 5 is clear as to its audience, you've not bowed to God and are still rebelling against him.

The real answer in this is that you're wrong, the text is only to believers. Why not grow tonight and accept this?