but as we have already observed, those kinds of farmers lose their land, see. So i understand that that seems like a valid justification, but when we observe the fruit it doesn't work, obviously. What i read up there is "Monocroppers level their fields to a dead-level plain that can't hold water and then pump chemicals onto it that have nowhere to go but the water supply."
yes, no doubt they have a better idea than God too, and i'm sure God really appreciates their help ok. We have such a great record of land conservation and all
hmm, i would characterize my experience more as "hands-off" i guess, and i gotta say i like the fruit a whole lot better, but we live on two different planets, basically, your premise is--well, was, right, let's not forget that part--as large and as cheap a monocrop as you can cultivate sold for profit once right now, and mine is as adequate and variable as the landowner needs to sustain themselves forever, no $ in the equation.
And i mean no offense, ok, but we are still here and your farm is gone now