easy; by believing that God is the head of Christ, and Jesus was a man, just like the Bible says
Was Jesus just a man?
Was He the Messiah?
Was He the Son of God?
Was He God?
You're allowed to believe what you will. You can't force your brain to believe something you don't.
What I'm saying is that there are standards to being called a Christian.
They were already made up just after Jesus died. It's not up to us to change what the requirements are. The might be right, they might be wrong (that could be discussed) but they can't just be dismissed and everyone allowed to call themselves a Christian when they do not adhere to Christian doctrine.
See?
It's not a matter of my belief or your belief.
As far as THIS is concerned there can only be ONE belief.
We could argue doctrine, but we cannot argue what makes one be a Christian.
You're saying this to the resurrection and to the Trinity.
If you don't believe in the resurrection and the Trinity, you really are not a Christian. These are fundamentals.
you will know them by their fruit
No, bb, this is not the bottom line of Christianity.
It's the bottom line of knowing a Christian. Or how we're supposed to know one.
By YOUR definition, a Buddhist could be a Christian because they also produce good fruit...
well, you could believe that He is the Son of Man, like He said, or really what you believe now is fine, i mean, notice how this "belief" you have is different from some "belief" that i have, but really none of these beliefs amount to much more than a way to divide us, right, when really all i care about where my neighbor (you) is concerned in the now is his fruit.
Beliefs are a pimple on the forehead of understanding :)
the fruit of beliefs is division, near as i can tell.
This belief would not separate me from you.
I'm just saying that we could serve the same God and be at peace but you could not be a Christian and I could be a Christian.
There is only ONE God.