Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If memory serves, I think the ancient Hebrew origin of the word meant to examine, long before the practice of scourging. It was adopted to mean scourging after that practice began. In quoting the Proverbs, the writer of Hebrews may have had that meaning in mind. Not that the Father whips His children until they are broken and bloody.of a judge ordering one to be scourged
Exactly! He was teaching concerning what you say compared to what you do. The one son said he wouldn't go (we presume he meant it) and then repented - changed his mind - and went. Because he went, even though his words were otherwise, this one did what was desired.I don't believe the Lord Jesus Christ was teaching about repentance here. So formulating doctrines of repentance, or even drawing strong conclusions for that matter, from a text that wasn't really addressing the topic at hand... Well, let's just say its probably not helpful.
I think Pilate examined Jesus even, before he was ordered to be scourgedIf memory serves, I think the ancient Hebrew origin of the word meant to examine, long before the practice of scourging. It was adopted to mean scourging after that practice began. In quoting the Proverbs, the writer of Hebrews may have had that meaning in mind. Not that the Father whips His children until they are broken and bloody.
Not to say His chastening can be an easy process to endure, and I speak from experience!
Much love!
John 19:1 Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged him. |
I can't find it @marks-If memory serves, I think the ancient Hebrew origin of the word meant to examine, long before the practice of scourging. It was adopted to mean scourging after that practice began. In quoting the Proverbs, the writer of Hebrews may have had that meaning in mind. Not that the Father whips His children until they are broken and bloody.
Not to say His chastening can be an easy process to endure, and I speak from experience!
Much love!
Hi Titus- A man had two sons and he came to the first and said son go work today in the vineyard
He answered and said I will not but afterward he repented and went
Then he came to the second son and said likewise
And he answered and said I go Sir, but he did not go
Which of the two did the will of the Father
They said to him the first...
God gives us examples of Biblical repentance.
Repentance is not changing ones mind without changing ones actions as we learn the true definition of repentance in this story.
If a thief quits stealing because he does not want to get caught, he has changed his mind.
But he has not repented.
The thief did not quit stealing because he feels sorrow for his sin. The thief only quit for his own selfish interests.
Biblical repentance is more than changing ones mind.
The thief had worldly sorrow if he had been caught but in repentance one changes their mind because they are sorry for doing wrong against God,
2Corinthians 7:10,
- for godly sorrow that is accordance to the will of God worketh repentance without regret, leading to salvation but the sorrow of the world produces death
Repentance is a change of mind brought about by godly sorrow that results in a reformation of ones life.
Repentance does include stopping sin against God. Without cessation of sin one has not truly repented.
Acts 26:20,
- but declared first to those in Damascus and in Jerusalem and throughout all the region of Judea and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent turn to God and do works consistent with repentance
Repentance , you turn from a path of sin to following in Christ's footsteps. Turned your path to God.
I'm having a hard time remembering where I sourced this. It looks like I may be wrong.I can't find it @marks-
No standard Hebrew lexicon explicitly connects the concept of "examination" with the Hebrew terms for "scourging." Lexicons generally treat words like שׁוֹט (shōṭ) or נָכָה (nakah) as terms for physical punishment, while words like חָקַר (ḥāqar) and בָּחַן (bāḥan) are used for mental, moral, or spiritual "examination."
1. Brown-Driver-Briggs (BDB) Lexicon
שׁוֹט (shōṭ):
Defined as "whip" or "scourge."
No mention of "examination."
Used in contexts of physical discipline (e.g., Proverbs 26:3).
נָכָה (nakah):
Defined as "to strike," "smite," or "beat."
Used broadly for physical acts, including judicial punishment (e.g., Deuteronomy 25:2-3).
No connotation of mental or moral "examination."
חָקַר (ḥāqar) and בָּחַן (bāḥan):
Defined as "to search," "examine," or "prove."
Always used in contexts of investigation, inquiry, or testing, but not physical punishment.
2. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT)
שׁוֹט (shōṭ):
Describes a literal whip or instrument of punishment.
No association with examination.
נָכָה (nakah):
Focuses on physical striking or affliction.
Includes contexts of judicial flogging but does not imply testing or examining.
חָקַר (ḥāqar):
Describes searching or examining, particularly by God (e.g., Psalm 139:23).
Completely separate from scourging or punishment.
3. Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon
שׁוֹט (shōṭ):
Defined as "a scourge or whip."
Refers to physical punishment; no connotation of examination.
חָקַר (ḥāqar) and בָּחַן (bāḥan):
Defined as "to search," "examine," or "test."
Always tied to intellectual or moral examination, not physical acts.
4. HALOT (Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament)
שׁוֹט (shōṭ):
Refers to a whip or scourge, used literally.
No connection to testing or examination.
חָקַר (ḥāqar):
Refers to searching or investigating, especially in a divine or legal sense.
Does not overlap with physical punishment.
Conclusion
Lexicons uniformly differentiate between "scourging" and "examination," treating them as separate concepts. While ancient cultural practices might have connected physical punishment with a form of testing or proving, there is no direct lexical evidence to suggest that the Hebrew term for scourging (shōṭ or similar terms) originally meant "to examine."
J.
You are absolutely correct-many desire a long, comfortable life while overlooking what Scripture teaches about suffering. Yet, every believer in Christ who seeks to live a godly life will inevitably face suffering and persecution.but also the entire range of trials and tribulations which He providentially ordains and which work to mortify sin and nurture faith.
Blue Letter Bible Proverbs 3:11 LXXDo you have access to the Septuagint Johann? I do not. I am curious as to how the passage is translated there, as Paul was likely quoting from the Greek OT and not the Hebrew.
Yes I do-on my e sword-which passage are you referring to @Simonides.?Do you have access to the Septuagint Johann? I do not. I am curious as to how the passage is translated there, as Paul was likely quoting from the Greek OT and not the Hebrew.
I was just looking at that, so far as I can see it supports whipping or the like as the meaning.Do you have access to the Septuagint Johann? I do not. I am curious as to how the passage is translated there, as Paul was likely quoting from the Greek OT and not the Hebrew.
Can you show me where I quoted from Spiro's Zhodiates @Simonides?Thanks, but you were quoting
Spiro's Zhodiates expanded definition, as much as I would love to take credit for his work. :-)