RLT63
Well-Known Member
You really have to make a stretch there. He goes on to say he created all thingsJohn isn't talking about the beginning of creation here. He is talking about the Beginning of Jesus' ministry.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You really have to make a stretch there. He goes on to say he created all thingsJohn isn't talking about the beginning of creation here. He is talking about the Beginning of Jesus' ministry.
Evidently, you did not understand what I wrote about authoritative references.Yesterday you sounded like you are against the apocrypha. Today you sound like you are for it!
yes he does ............dont he . it is in quite a few placesYou really have to make a stretch there. He goes on to say he created all things
Are you the authority on authoritative references? - LOLEvidently, you did not understand what I wrote about authoritative references.
The fun you are having is being obtuse.He's not dissuading me, I'm having some fun with this one.
Another post where you reveal a rejection of embracing authoritative references. Perhaps this will help. https://www.montana.edu/rmaher/ee417/Authoritative References.pdfI don't think he has thought it through and it sounds like he read something or saw a video which said Enoch is no good, and I want to know if his opinion was dissuaded because of that article or video or because of what the book says? How did he draw this conclusion about Enoch?
Reader and all beware for the father of lies cometh in his own nameAre you the authority on authoritative references? - LOL
[
I don't know about THE authority. LOLAre you the authority on authoritative references? - LOL
LOL You got that right! My paycheck is coming up soon but not soon enough to keep up with your "interfaith" references.And what i write next will have wrangler going to the phone lines to call up some donations .
INTERFAITH IS HIS GLUE
I just had a very lovely thought . Why not rather flee interfaithLOL You got that right! My paycheck is coming up soon but not soon enough to keep up with your "interfaith" references.
No. The word is best translated "through." This means Jesus was the means or purpose by which the Creator created. Sons are created beings, not the creator.But Christ was the one by whom all things were created
Remember what JESUS the CHRIST of GOD , was telling even the phariseesWise men still worship Him
People forget Christ came and emptied Himself to be born as a man.
But Christ was the one by whom all things were created, in Him all things consist and all things are for Him and through Him.
Of course as a man, Christ tells people to worship the one true God, and frequently points them to God. He is humble. In His earthly estate HE fully relied on God the Father.
But not to all people has Christ been revealed as God, they do not recognize Him, but when they see Him enthroned in glory, then they will understand..
Good Morning,John isn't talking about the beginning of creation here. He is talking about the Beginning of Jesus' ministry.
Technically Speaking GOD never had a beginning , cause HE sure did not create himself . He always was and always hasGood Morning,
Now serving fresh ground & brewed coffee.
Yes, when the Word became flesh and dwelt among us.
this is the Apostle John = same Apostle of the Gospel of John
John 1:1 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:14 - The Word became flesh
1John1:1 - That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our own eyes, which we have gazed upon and touched with our own hands—this is the Word of life.
1 John1:2 - And this is the life that was revealed;
the Apostle John always places the Lord Jesus Christ as Eternal with the FATHER.
This Creation of the ELOHIM = FATHER/WORD/HOLY SPIRIT = has a Beginning and so did the Ministry of Immanuel on earth
As usual-wrangling the plain Scripture.No. The word is best translated "through." This means Jesus was the means or purpose by which the Creator created. Sons are created beings, not the creator.
He sure do wrangle dont he .As usual-wrangling the plain Scripture.
John 1:3 (Textus Receptus)
"Πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο, καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν."
"All things were made by Him; and without Him was not anything made that was made."
The Greek phrase "δι' αὐτοῦ" (translated as "by Him" or "through Him") does not imply that Jesus is merely the means or purpose of creation.
Rather, the word "δι'" can mean "by" or "through," but it emphasizes the personal agency of the Logos (the Word, Jesus) in creation. It highlights that creation is not just an indirect act of Jesus; He is the active agent through whom everything came into being. The verse shows the idea that nothing was made without Him, pointing to His divine role in creation.
This indicates Jesus is not merely a "created being" in the sense of being part of creation, but that He is actively involved in creation itself. His identity is further clarified in verse 1, where the Word (Logos) is declared to be God: "and the Word was God" (John 1:1).
2. Colossians 1:16-17 (Textus Receptus)
"ὅτι ἐν αὐτῷ ἐκτίσθη τὰ πάντα, τὰ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, τὰ ὁρατὰ καὶ τὰ ἀόρατα, εἴτε θρόνοι εἴτε κυριότητες εἴτε ἀρχαὶ εἴτε ἐξουσίαι· τὰ πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ καὶ εἰς αὐτόν ἐκτίσθη."
"For by Him were all things created, that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by Him, and for Him."
In Colossians 1:16, Paul reinforces that all things were created through Him (δι' αὐτοῦ), but also for Him (εἰς αὐτόν).
This not only stresses His role in creation but also affirms His pre-existence and eternal purpose in creating everything. Jesus is not part of creation; rather, all creation was made for Him and through Him.
The verse points to Jesus’ divine nature as the Creator, clearly distinguishing Him from created beings. The “sons” (or created beings) mentioned in the refutation are distinct from the Logos (Jesus), who is the Creator and sustainer of all things.
3. Theological Clarification: The Logos and Creation
The Logos in both John 1:3 and Colossians 1:16 is portrayed as actively involved in creation. The theological implication of this is that Jesus, as the eternal Logos (Word), is not a created being but is the Creator.
Your statement "Sons are created beings, not the Creator" reflects a misunderstanding of Jesus' divine nature as revealed in Scripture.
According to Christian orthodoxy, especially as articulated in the Nicene Creed, Jesus (the Logos) is fully divine, eternally begotten of the Father, and uncreated. As the Creator, Jesus transcends the created order and is not Himself part of it.
4. Refutation of the "Through" Translation Argument
While it is true that the preposition "δι'" can be translated as "through," this does not reduce the agency of the Logos in creation to a mere passive role.
In both John 1:3 and Colossians 1:16, the context of creation implies active participation rather than mere instrumentality.
The Logos (Jesus) is presented as the agent through whom the Father created all things, not as a passive bystander or a created being who merely facilitates creation.
Additionally, the distinction between the Creator and the created is crucial. The Bible consistently presents the Logos (Jesus) as distinct from creation, not as part of it. John 1:1-3 and Colossians 1:16-17 both reinforce the theological understanding that Jesus is the uncreated Creator, not a created being.
Your claim that "the word is best translated 'through'" is true in one sense, but it overlooks the active role of Jesus (the Logos) in creation. Both John 1:3 and Colossians 1:16 emphasize that Jesus, the Logos, is the Creator and not a created being. The Logos is both fully divine and the eternal agent of creation, not a "son" in the created sense.
Therefore, the idea that Jesus is merely the "means" or "purpose" of creation does not align with the scriptural teaching that He is the Creator Himself.
J.
Lacking coffeee and i see what i have to changeTechnically Speaking GOD never had a beginning , cause HE sure did not create himself . He always was and always has
been . Its just no man can relate to this time that has no beginning and no end .
Many also make the mistake of thinking GOD created JESUS the CHRIST . No sir and no mams
HIS WORD be HE what clearly occured was THE TIME for the WORD to become flesh came and was manifested
for a short time in OUR TIME to be declared the CHRIST of GOD so that all who do beleive in HIM shall not perish
but have everlasting life .
That Spirit is specifically stated to be the Spirit of Christ. So the entire Old testament scriptures were all inspired by Christ HimselfRemember what JESUS the CHRIST of GOD , was telling even the pharisees
as His own judgment .
What did they say to HIM . IF YE be the CHRIST tell us plainly .
Jesus PROVED HIMSELF CHRIST by HIS WORDS and HIS ACTIONS . but they could not see this .
OFten if we read the bible, while we might THINK JESUS never identifies Himself as GOD
i can assure us IF WE READ HIS OWN WORDS , THEY SHOW US WHO HE IS .
As well as HIS words in revelation . HIS OWN words and the TESTIMONY of the prophets
as well as the testimony of apostels , CLEARLY show us what many desire NOT TO SEE .
That indeed GOD IS THE WORD , HE IS ALPHA and OMEGA , FIRST and the LAST .
JESUS testified all right . But HIS own words are often abused and twisted by men unto their own destruction
as are the words the VERY SPIRIT had inspired unto the prophets of old
and unto even the apostels who left us letters in that bible . Just a friendly reminder to all .