Strength and Honor: Triumphing over Feminism

[MA2444]

Says WHO?!

Again, sez WHO?! It's a shame that some of you guys think that you're "all THAT" and then some, that EVERY woman should be swooning at your feet!

Seriously MA, some men really don't get that a woman would rather live in a box...under the freeway...in the pouring rain...digging her meal out of a dumpster...than live in mansion with a man who has no love in his heart, and only contempt for her...believing that she's only good for cooking, cleaning, and ska-rooing.

I'll take my chances in that box ANY DAY.

Good luck with that.

Can you load ammo into magazines and make sandwiches? If not, you may want a poncho!

 

[Mink57]

Good luck with that.

Can you load ammo into magazines and make sandwiches? If not, you may want a poncho!

Good luck with WHAT??

And besides, can YOU load ammo into magazines AND make sandwiches?

I'd probably do the same thing YOU would. Load the magazine FIRST, THEN make the sandwich. Ohh, but I'd probably make a much better sandwich that YOU ever would.

Like I said, most of us would rather live under a bridge....

 

[MA2444]

Pastor Steve Ciocalanti said we are in Revelation 6. The 2nd Horse of the Apocolypse was released with the start of the Ukraine war. Each horse has 2.5 years, putting the 3rd Horse release to coincide closely with the mid term. World wide financial collapse.

I like that guy. I've watched quite a bit of his videos.

It's been a little while since they tried to assassinate Trump so they could be ready to try again by now. Trump needs our prayers for his safety & his family, and his administration.

 

[MA2444]

Good luck with WHAT??

And besides, can YOU load ammo into magazines AND make sandwiches?

I'd probably do the same thing YOU would. Load the magazine FIRST, THEN make the sandwich. Ohh, but I'd probably make a much better sandwich that YOU ever would.

Like I said, most of us would rather live under a bridge....

You would rather live under a bridge. Wow. You must have tons more faith then me!

But I would make sandwiches first before contaminating my hands with lead.
Unless we were under fire at the time. Having no spouse any more, I had to go with 67 extra mags which are already loaded! (sic).

 

[MA2444]

Well, it's not really 67 magazines, lol. I wish it was.

 

[MA2444]

If (when) something big happens in the US then there prolly will be lots of people under bridges. If the grid goes down then life will suddenly get much harder for most people. It would set America back 125 years or more.

What we would call that is a survival situation where if you aint prepared then you'll likely die. I would suggest that what we call a survival situation, 125 years ago they called day to day life. So you have to have some things. Sleeping bag and tent, cooking off grid supplies, percolator coffee pot, first aid kit, rifle, pistol.

Just like they lived in western days. Remember? They always had a bedroll behind their saddle. And...not much else except rifle and saddle bags, and I always thought it was so funny that anytime those Cartwrights are making their way to another destination and have to sleep out some night...those guys always suddenly had cast iron skillets and coffee pots and all sorts of stuff! You never get to see them pull all that stuff out of their saddlebags, but you will need more than saddle bags hold!

One canteen of water don't last very long, lol!

 

[Wrangler]

Seriously MA, some men really don't get that a woman would rather live in a box...under the freeway...in the pouring rain...digging her meal out of a dumpster...than live in mansion with a man who has no love in his heart, and only contempt for her...believing that she's only good for cooking, cleaning, and ska-rooing.

Remarkable adherence to indoctrination, totally void of rational thinking skills.

First, the appeal to exceptions. Societal rules are not based on exceptions. I’ve posted MANY vids where women polled consistently said they’d rather be with a rich man who doesn’t love them than a poor man who does love them.

This is hypergamy. This is a rational, time tested strategy for survival. It is a VERY successful survival strategy.

Second, men have dating and preferences for a partner, which is perfectly acceptable and reflects patriarchal strategy for survival. It is a VERY successful survival strategy.

Third, you are the one projecting hate onto men’s dating preferences and successful survival strategy. At a minimum, men know a good partner is good for cooking, cleaning, and ska-rooing (fertility). Feminism teaches women to NOT be a good partner to men.

Fourth, feminists who are good at anything other than these things - beyond traditional values of fidelity, humility, caring for the house and the other Proverbs 31 women - are not preferred or valued by men. This reveals the evil of feminism, hating men for having preferences that feminism does not approve of.

Fifth, this explains the countless vids I’ve posted that shows feminists bringing nothing to the table in a relationship with a man besides ska-rooing. This reveals the evil of feminism, reducing relationships between the sexes to base, hormonally driven animals.

 

[Wrangler]

believing that she's only good for cooking, cleaning, and ska-rooing.

Said more succinctly. What’s wrong with cooking, cleaning, and ska-rooing; Aside from your vulgar categorization of love making due to your palpable hatred of male sexuality?

In the spirit of Equality, turn the tables around. Imagine that all men hate to do to make women happy was the easy work - cook and clean; And enjoy making love to the partner he chose? It’s inconceivable that men would have contempt for this easy path, complaining endlessly online!

 

[quietthinker]

Strength and Honor: Triumphing over Feminism​

agghhh...and I thought Russel Crowe was hoping to triumph over the Barbarians!

 

[Naomanos]

Trust is the goal but its earned by consistent action. Its not just a given.

Im glad you two are talking more because of this thread.

The best case scenario is that she values loyalty, supportiveness, and kindness in a man above all else. Maybe?

But if this is her type why didn't she marry that kind of man to begin with? He turned out to be a repeat cheater. If that was a mistake she acknowledges and now she wants a man who won't do that to her I can understand that. But she was initially attracted to the sort of man who would and could cheat multiple times.

She should value what you bring to her life and appreciate that, not just desire someone who is not like the ex husband in being disloyal.

My fiance decided not to respond. To her it’s not worth it. She believes people will continue to believe what they want regardless of what she says. She has seen it in this thread when I have shown her the posts.

I will tell you that she calls me her ex-husband’s name 2.0. She said that I have all his good qualities and none of his bad ones. She did state to me that she absolutely does value what I bring to her life and appreciates it more than I can ever know.

I made her cry yesterday because I said to her that I know what to get her for Christmas, but I don’t know what type of that thing that she wants. She asked me to elaborate. So, I did. She had mentioned wanting a tea bag organizer several weeks ago. I told her that I want to get her one. She started crying because she said that I actually listen to her when she speaks and pay attention. She said it’s these things, these little things and big things that I do that show her that I love her each and every day.

This thread has just solidified more that we want to have an egalitarian marriage. We thank you for your concern Wynona, but we fully believe that it is what will be best for our marriage.

Again, I am not saying that egalitarian will work for every marriage, just as I believe that a patriarchal marriage works for everyone. I will say it again that all marriages are different and there is no cookie cutter way of doing them.

 

[Mink57]

Said more succinctly. What’s wrong with cooking, cleaning, and ska-rooing; Aside from your vulgar categorization of love making due to your palpable hatred of male sexuality?

LOLOLOLOLOL!!! Hey, I'm just taking my cue from how I hear MOST men talk!!! They don't refer to it as "love-making" and I'm SURE already know that!! Don't pretend to be prudish, Wrangler.

In the spirit of Equality, turn the tables around. Imagine that all men hate to do to make women happy was the easy work - cook and clean;

You think cooking, cleaning...AND childcare is EASY??? If that's what you believe, then you really ARE out of touch with reality!

And enjoy making love to the partner he chose? It’s inconceivable that men would have contempt for this easy path, complaining endlessly online!

Really? If it's so easy, then why don't more men contribute to housework...IF it's so easy?

 

[Naomanos]

You think cooking, cleaning...AND childcare is EASY???

Having been a stay-at-home dad to five kids when I lived in Upstate, NY, I can absolutely tell you that it is not an easy job to do. I loved doing it and would do it again, but it is not at all easy.

I want to explain the above just a little.

I was with the mother of my five oldest children for 10 years. I had walked away from God and the Catholic Church in my teens. So, I got into a relationship with this girl. She never wanted to get married as it was just a piece of paper to her. No, she’s not a feminist. She just didn’t want to get married, back then. We moved to Upstate, NY. I was working as an EMT. I would have only been paid $7.12 an hour and that was before union dues would be taken out.

We decided that I would stay home with the kids because she would make more money than I would. We also only had one vehicle and mass transit wasn’t a huge thing up there.

Just felt that needed an explanation.

 

[Wrangler]

I'm just taking my cue from how I hear MOST men talk!!!

No accountability. Funny how OTOH, you scream for equality when it comes to perks. OTOH, when it comes to responsibility, you claim to be just a response creature with no moral agency whatsoever.

You think cooking, cleaning...AND childcare is EASY???

Relative to the other work of building and maintaining civilization and the structure of a house, yes.

 

[Mink57]

Having been a stay-at-home dad to five kids when I lived in Upstate, NY, I can absolutely tell you that it is not an easy job to do. I loved doing it and would do it again, but it is not at all easy.

Problem is, too many men think like Wrangler. That homemaking and childcare is "easy." That attitude sets (mostly)men up to take advantage of and not appreciate all the work the (usually) wife/mother does.

There is something that's getting more and more attention these days, and that's called the "Mental Load." When it comes to housekeeping and childcare, it's the invisible mental work of keeping track of the details that goes into running a home with children.

I want to explain the above just a little.

I was with the mother of my five oldest children for 10 years. I had walked away from God and the Catholic Church in my teens. So, I got into a relationship with this girl. She never wanted to get married as it was just a piece of paper to her. No, she’s not a feminist. She just didn’t want to get married, back then. We moved to Upstate, NY. I was working as an EMT. I would have only been paid $7.12 an hour and that was before union dues would be taken out.

We decided that I would stay home with the kids because she would make more money than I would. We also only had one vehicle and mass transit wasn’t a huge thing up there.

Just felt that needed an explanation.

No prob! Thanks for sharing!

 

[Naomanos]

There is something that's getting more and more attention these days, and that's called the "Mental Load." When it comes to housekeeping and childcare, it's the invisible mental work of keeping track of the details that goes into running a home with children.

I can definitely understand this!

 

[Mink57]

No accountability. Funny how OTOH, you scream for equality when it comes to perks. OTOH, when it comes to responsibility, you claim to be just a response creature with no moral agency whatsoever.

What I wrote has nothing to do with MY accountability; it has to do with MEN'S accountability.

Relative to the other work of building and maintaining civilization and the structure of a house, yes.

Oh, please...YOU had NOTHING to do with building and maintaining civilization and the structure of the house. To take credit for that YOURSELF, just shows your hubris.

 

[Naomanos]

Oh, please...YOU had NOTHING to do with building and maintaining civilization and the structure of the house. To take credit for that YOURSELF, just shows your hubris.

My fiance has said something similar.

She has said that these days, there isn’t a whole lot of maintaining the structure of a house anymore for the husband. He will likely hire someone to come and say put on a new roof and if he does do it himself, that roof is likely a 30 year roof. It’s not like he is doing it everyday.

 

[Wrangler]

What I wrote has nothing to do with MY accountability; it has to do with MEN'S accountability.

Such as it always is.

 

[Wrangler]

Oh, please...YOU had NOTHING to do with building and maintaining civilization and the structure of the house. To take credit for that YOURSELF, just shows your hubris.

Be that as it may, the point is in the division of labor, there is relatively difficult and relatively easy work. Good men don’t want their woman to do the relatively hard work.

For some reason, feminists resent what is traditionally called women’s work AS IF it is beneath them. All work is needed and all work has the dignity of labor.

 

[Mink57]

My fiance has said something similar.

She has said that these days, there isn’t a whole lot of maintaining the structure of a house anymore for the husband. He will likely hire someone to come and say put on a new roof and if he does do it himself, that roof is likely a 30 year roof. It’s not like he is doing it everyday.

Exactly! Plus, in THIS day and age, plenty of women would be right up there on that roof WITH him! I know, *I* would