After this comment I’m going to be to Judy to respond for a while. The links I shared dives into this subject in depth.Here is how its used in the KJV /NT only and the number of times
Hell G86 = hades KJV
hell 10, grave 1
Hell G1067 = geenna KJV
hell 9
I do get the words can mean either one or the other and we can look at those as each is used in any specific verse, but this one right here (from the above)
When Jesus says,
Luke 12:5 But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; (gehenna) G1067 yea, I say unto you, Fear him.
My question is how would you understand Jesus use of it here, since he references "after he hath killed" there. You do not believe Jesus is speaking of an actual city there (which after one is killed) can be cast into it do you?
What I am saying is that it’s only outdated masoretic texts that confuse hades and hell and merges hades with hell, a few times. That’s considered bad hermunetics among biblical scholars.
Hades means the grave.
Gehenna means hell.
Gehenna never means the grave.
Gehenna did not ever get confused for the grave until a few centuries ago.
The lake of fire is hell. It says death and the grave ( hades ) gets cast into the lake of fire which is the second death, which is what is used to describe hell.
Revelation is not written to be read literally. It’s written to be understood through symbolism.
As for the rest, another day I can add a few comments. But the best bet is the links. Or eventually I’ll do a thread on the three different views of hell. Starting with the two oldest views, that of conditional immortality and universalism followed by the newest develop, that of eternal conscious torment due to biblical literalism and modern readings of revelation. A book canonized shortly before 400ad.